Guest guest Posted April 24, 2006 Report Share Posted April 24, 2006 THE FACTS U.S. Chamber CEO Donohue, 5/10/01: " Lawsuit abuse has created a climate of fear with a chilling effect on new product creation and business expansion. " _21_ (http://www.peopleoverprofits.org/chamber_footnotes.htm) " Lawsuit abuse is a serious problem. " _22_ (http://www.peopleoverprofits.org/chamber_footnotes.htm) A Recent Survey from the National Association of Manufacturers Suggests that " Lawsuit Abuse " is Not a Top Concern for American Manufacturing Companies. The National Association of Manufacturers recently released_23_ (http://www.peopleoverprofits.org/chamber_footnotes.htm) a survey of manufacturers in the United States showing that the " fear of litigation " ranked at the bottom of their list of concerns: " Please rate the following factors in terms of their negative impact on your company's operations (with 1 representing the greatest negative impact and 10 the least). " _24_ (http://www.peopleoverprofits.org/chamber_footnotes.htm) * 2.9 Cost of non-wage compensation * 3.5 Cost of materials used in production * 4.0 Inability to raise prices * 4.1 Energy prices * 5.0 Foreign competition * 6.1 Taxes * 6.3 Cost of wages * 6.4 Shortage of qualified workers * 7.4 Regulations/corporate governance rules (Sarbanes-Oxley) * 7.8 Fear of litigation A Survey from Business Week Magazine Suggests that " Lawsuit Abuse " is not a Major Concern for Small Business Owners. According to a recent survey published_25_ (http://www.peopleoverprofits.org/chamber_footnotes.htm) in Business Week magazine, owners of small and medium-sized businesses are generally not concerned about the threat of lawsuits: " One of the survey's more surprising results revealed that tort reform -- particularly limiting class-action lawsuits -- is not a major priority. " The survey found that the biggest threats to their businesses are: (1) Rising inflation, 44 percent; (2) The trade deficit and a weak dollar, 40 percent; (3) Energy shortages, 40 percent; (4) Excessive household and/or corporate debt, 29 percent; (5) The growing federal deficit, 28 percent; (6) Poorly prepared labor force/Shortage of skilled labor, 27 percent. A Survey of Federal Judges Found that an " Overwhelming Majority " Don't See " Frivolous Lawsuits " as Major Problem. According to survey by the Federal Judicial Center - the research and education agency of the federal court system - most Federal judges do not view " frivolous lawsuits " as a problem: " Frivolous litigation is not a major problem in the federal court system, according to an overwhelming majority of federal judges who participated in a recent survey. The survey, conducted by the Federal Judicial Center, was based on the responses of 278 federal district court judges. Seventy percent of the respondents called groundless litigation either a 'small problem' or a 'very small problem,' and 15% said it was no problem at all. Only 1% called it a 'very large problem,' 2% called it a 'large problem' and the rest rated it as a 'moderate problem' in their courts. ... In addition, 91% of the judges surveyed opposed provisions in the Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act, which won House approval in the last Congress. " _26_ (http://www.peopleoverprofits.org/chamber_footnotes.htm) Bush Administration Statistics Show that the Number of Federal Tort Trials is Down Nearly 80 Percent Since 1985. Last year, the Bush Justice Department reported that the number of tort (personal injury) cases resolved in U.S. District Courts fell by 79 percent between 1985 and 2003. In 1985, 3,600 tort trials were decided by a judge or jury in U.S. District Courts. By 2003, that number had dropped to less than 800._27_ (http://w ww.peopleoverprofits.org/chamber_footnotes.htm) The Number of State Tort Trials is Decreasing. According to the most recent statistics from the Bush administration's Bureau of Justice Statistics, the number of tort trials at the state level has decreased. These statistics were compiled as part of the Bureau's survey of state civil justice systems in the nation's largest 75 counties. Among these counties, the number of tort trials decreased 31.8% between 1992 and 2001._28_ (http://www.peopleoverprofits.org/chamber_footnotes.htm) _Warn Friends About This Bogus Study_ (http://action.peopleoverprofits.org/tellafriend/) IV. THE U.S. CHAMBER'S RHETORIC: " EXCESSIVE LITIGATION " RESULTS IN A " TORT TAX " ON ALL AMERICANS CHAMBER ATTACK THE FACTS U.S. Chamber CEO Donohue, 9/14/05: " Our society is now coming to understand what the business community has known for many years - that the litigation explosion in the United States represents a punishing tax on all citizens. It stifles innovation and job creation. And it has unfairly enriched a handful of lawyers while slowing the wheels of justice for those who truly deserve relief and compensation. " _29_ (http://www.peopleoverprofits.org/chamber_footnotes.htm) U.S. Chamber Used a Widely Discredited " Study " to Support Their Claims Regarding the Costs of the Legal System; Business Week Called It a " Wild Exaggeration. " To support their claims about the " cost " of the American legal system, the U.S. Chamber cites a study by the insurance industry-consulting firm_30_ (http://www.peopleoverprofits.org/chamber_footnotes.htm) , Tillinghast-Towers Perrin (TTP). However, this study, which is updated annually, has been widely discredited because it includes the cost of the insurance industry - multimillion dollar salaries for insurance CEOs, rent on office buildings, and administration overhead - in the " cost " of lawsuits. Business Week magazine editorialized that the study " includes everything from payouts for fender-benders to the salaries of insurance industry CEOs. It's a wild exaggeration. " _31_ (http://www.peopleoverprofits.org/chamber_footnotes.htm) * Congressional Quarterly Called Conclusions of TTP Study " sketchy at best. " Congressional Quarterly Weekly magazine did an entire story describing the evidence behind the figures cited by President Bush in his call for legal restrictions " sketchy at best. " They examined the " tort tax " figure and found, " Nearly all the assertions about the growing cost of the tort system are based on the figures from just one actuarial and management consulting firm, Tillinghast Towers-Perrin, that works for the insurance industry, which has a stake in limiting lawsuits. ... The company's estimates of tort costs include the insurance industry's administrative expenses and payments on claims that never involve courts or lawyers, such as auto collisions. " _32_ (http://www.peopleoverprofits.org/chamber_footnotes.htm) * TTP Admitted that Past Study Not a Reflection of the Tort System. After being criticized for the methodology, TTP was forced to admit in their 2005 edition that " the costs tabulated in this study are not a reflection of litigated claims or of the legal system. " _33_ (http://www.peopleoverprofits.org/chamber_footnotes.htm) * The Study's Primary Author Said Study Used in a Misleading Way. Russ Sutter, primary researcher for the study, admitted in 2005 that tort-reform advocates use the data " in a way that's probably misleading. " _34_ (http://www.peopleoverprofits.org/chamber_footnotes.htm) * Analysis of Past Studies Revealed Flawed Data. A May 2005 report_35_ (http://www.peopleoverprofits.org/chamber_footnotes.htm) from the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), a nonprofit, nonpartisan think tank in Washington D.C. revealed that TTP's reports are one-sided, exaggerating the impact of the tort system and ignoring its benefits, and that evidence supporting them is shaky or nonexistent. Claims that the tort system harms the U.S. economy do not square with the data. In fact, there is a good deal of evidence to the contrary. EPI's careful examination concludes that nearly half of the " costs " of the tort system described in the Tillinghast study are actually payments made to from wrongdoers to injured people for lost wages, property damage, or medical care - costs that are the result of injuries caused by the defendants and would be borne by society one way or another, whether by government programs or charities, or absorbed by the victims and their families. * Wall Street Journal: New Version of TTP Study " Includes Payments that Don't Involve the Legal System at All. " The Wall Street Journal previewed the new version of the TTP report, and noted that it includes costs that are not part of the legal system: " ...critics of past years' studies -- and there are many -- say the number and the projections that come with it are deeply flawed. For instance, they include payments that don't involve the legal system at all. Say somebody smashes his car into the back of your new SUV and his insurance company sends you a $5,000 check to fix the damage. That gets counted as a tort cost in Tillinghast's number. Critics say it's just a transfer payment from somebody who wasn't driving carefully to somebody who has been legitimately wronged. How is that evidence of a system run amok? " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.