Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Interesting US paper with long term follow up?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Many thanks for this Woody, it is an interesting paper, although I found it difficult to contextualise because US services and child protection regulations are so different from ours (must remember this when reviewers remind me of the 'international audience' in submitted papers!!)SafeCare is described as a structured behavioural skills training program that focuses on concrete caregiving, household management and parenting skills - I haven't come across it before and feel I should check it out, as it has apparently been in use in university settings (does that mean in research or for students, I wonder?) since 1979 and resulted in over 60 publications. I note that, for this trial, it was being used with families whose children were aged up to 12 years old, in conjunction with home visiting, although I didn't find any information about the intensity of that home visiting. I found it distracting that they used the acronym HV to refer to 'paraprofessional home visitors,' who were characterised in a table as 'HV licensed' (between 15 and 20%, depending on arm of trial) and graduate (between 23% and 42%). I would like to know more about these people, who are clearly not health visitors as we know them, but seem to be doing a very good job, since trials that show a reduction in 'recidivism' for child maltreatment are very few and far between, particularly with a focus on neglect and follow-up as long as six yearsThank you for drawing this to our attention.best wishes On 7 Jun 2012, at 09:47, Caan, Woody wrote: Chaffin M, Hecht D, Bard D, et al. A statewide trial of the SafeCare home-based services model with parents in Child Protective Services. Pediatrics. 2012 Mar;129(3):509-15. Epub 2012 Feb 20. (Original) PMID: 22351883 Abstract OBJECTIVES: In this trial, we compared Child Protective Services (CPS) recidivism outcomes between the home-based SafeCare (SC) model for child neglect and comparable home-based services, but without SC modules, for parents in the CPS system across 2 quality control strategies: coached © and uncoached implementation. SC is a home-based behavioral skills training model designed for neglecting or maltreating parents. The study was conducted in a scaled-up, statewide implementation setting. METHODS: Two thousand one hundred seventy-five maltreating parents, treated by 219 home visitors, were enrolled and treated in a 2 x 2 (SC versus services as usual x C versus uncoached implementation strategy) randomized cluster experiment. Cases were followed for an average of 6 years for CPS recidivism events. Subpopulation analyses were conducted for parents meeting customary SC inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Consistently significant main effects in favor of SC were found across simple and more complex modeling approaches (hazard ratios = 0.74-0.83). Larger effects were found among the subpopulation meeting customary SC inclusion criteria. C implementation yielded smaller and occasionally significant effects in analyses that included more diverse cases falling outside customary SC inclusion criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the adoption and use of SC within CPS home-based services systems. C implementation may be especially valuable for cases where the client-model fit is less strong. From: [ ] on behalf of Cheryll [cheryllma@...] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 3:44 PM Subject: FW: Fantastic opportunity to build a new Parent Infant Psychotherapy service in Northamptonshire! Great opportunity for the right person, please pass onto anyone who may be interested. Cheryll The information contained in this email message and any attachments is confidential and is intended for the named recipient only. If you have received this message in error, please destroy it and notify the sender immediately. The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying, or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden, as is passing it to a third party without the prior permission of the sender. From: Sally Pike <spike@...> Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 14:15:48 +0100 WAVE Trust Office <office@...> Subject: Fantastic opportunity to build a new Parent Infant Psychotherapy service in Northamptonshire! Good afternoon Please find below a role you or someone you know might be interested in. Kind regards Sally <image001.jpg> Clinical Director - Job Description Job Title: Clinical Director Salary: £40,000 (pro rata) – negotiable Hours: 3 days per week Accountable to: Executive Director and the Board of Trustees Direct Line management of the Clinical team. S/he will report to the Board of Trustees on clinical issues. Location: House, Watling St East, Towcester, Northamptonshire (With a view to moving to a Children’s Centre in Northampton) Essential qualifications and experienceThe successful candidate will need to have a professional qualification in adult/child or parent/infant psychotherapy/clinical psychologist or equivalent together with a minimum of 5 years post qualification experience, including substantial experience of parent-infantpsychotherapy. Job Summary:This post offers an exceptional opportunity to develop and manage the clinical work of the Northamptonshire Parent Infant Project,(NORPIP) to reach more families in Northamptonshire. We are a newly registered Charity (established in September 2011). We offer up to date and best evidenced techniques to deliver Psychological therapies, interventions, group programmes and training. Research and evaluation skills are also essential. We are looking for a Clinical Director who has significant experience and credibility in this field together with excellent organisational skills and the ability to share in high-level advocacy with the Executive Director. This person will need to be passionate about promoting infant mental health and will be determined to lead NORPIP into the next phase of its development. S/he will need to collaborate and work very closely with the Executive Director. Main Responsibilities as Clinical Director: Manage, develop and support the Clinical Team – including supporting the therapists in the development of new initiatives and innovative ways of working. Maintain relationships with statutory partners in local authorities and provide the link with managers of Children’s’ Centres where NORPIP is working to ensure that NORPIP is delivering to its contracts. Work with the Executive Director on commissioning to secure contracts with the NHS, Local Authorities and other commissioning bodies. Provide Case management and (some) professional clinical supervision to the team of therapists Work with the Clinical Team to match the demands of new funding opportunities with the capacity and resources within the team so that planning is coherent and integrated. Lead the strategy to deliver consultation and training in attachment and infant mental health. Determine casework priorities, manage clinical services and allocate work to clinicians. Manage referrals and monitor the waiting list. Ensure that procedures for safeguarding children are followed, as well as being reviewed and updated at least annually. Manage systems for clinical audit and lead research and evaluation projects to demonstrate the clinical effectiveness of NORPIP’s work in order to provide a sound evidence base. Manage the recruitment of new team members as and when this is necessary. Provide clinical input into the negotiation of statutory contracts, monitor, maintain oversight and accountability, and write reports. Provide clinical expertise in the reporting of clinical work to statutory clients. Work closely with Executive Director on preparation of bids to Trusts and other potential funders and on project monitoring reports. In conjunction with clinicians write evaluation reports for Commissioners to be signed off by Executive Director. Advocacy and Development Develop and promote the profile of NORPIP to key organizations working in the field of infant mental health and other linked services both locally and nationally. Inform the professional content for the website for use by the team, other professionals and to explain NORPIP’s approach. Work with the Executive Director, clinicians and trustees to ensure that NORPIP’s work is explained effectively to external audiences, supporters, fundraising events etc. Support the Executive Director in promoting NORPIP’s work at national level. Develop and maintain strong links with statutory agencies and relevant voluntary sector agencies. Develop the vision of and implement NORPIP’s strategy and services as agreed with the Trustees Person specification· As Clinical Director of NORPIP you will be passionate about promoting parent and infant mental health, and demonstrating its effectiveness. · You will need to have several years demonstrable working experience as a fully qualified parent infant psychotherapist/clinical psychologist or equivalent.· You will need to collaborate very closely with colleagues, both Clinicians and the Executive Director. · You will be highly organised, able to manage and lead a team of therapists, both in NORPIP’s current service delivery in Northamptonshire but also as NORPIP develops its work locally and nationally. · You will need to be able to think strategically about how to deliver our clinical objectives most effectively, including issues such as training, evaluation and research. · You will also need to be able to work strategically with the Executive Director on a variety of funding opportunities as part of the management team. How to applyNORPIP is an organisation which follows rigorous safeguarding procedures, and the successful applicant will need to have an enhanced CRB check. Please list your job history with starting and leaving dates for each job and reasons for leaving. Please also state relevant qualifications with precise dates. Original certificates, picture ID and a utility bill with your current address received within the last 3 months will also be required at interview stage. Please send your CV, a letter of application and the aboveinformation to our Office Manager, Bird on email address: info@.... <image001.jpg> Bird Office ManagerTel: 01604 924735Email: info@...Web: www.norpip.org.ukAddress: House, 138 Watling Street East, Towcester. Northants NN12 6BTRegistered charity no.:1144189 -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Mrs Sally Pike PA to Hosking WAVE Trust Cameron House, 61 Friends Road Croydon Surrey, CR0 1ED tel: +44 (0) 20 8688 3773 fax: +44 (0) 20 8688 6135 www.wavetrust.org, office@... WAVE Trust Ltd (Worldwide Alternatives to ViolencE), a company limited by guarantee. Registered charity number 1080189 in England and Wales. Please be aware that I work part-time and that I am not in the office on Monday or Thursday mornings. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Email has been scanned for viruses by Altman Technologies' email management service EMERGING EXCELLENCE: In the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) 2008, more than 30% of our submissions were rated as 'Internationally Excellent' or 'World-leading'.Among the academic disciplines now rated 'World-leading' are Allied Health Professions Studies; Art Design; English Language Literature; Geography Environmental Studies; History; Music; Psychology; and Social Work Social Policy Administration. Visit www.anglia.ac.uk/rae for more information. This e-mail and any attachments are intended for the above named recipient(s) only and may be privileged. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone: please reply to this e-mail to highlight the error and then immediately delete the e-mail from your system. Any opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Anglia Ruskin University. Although measures have been taken to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus we advise that, in keeping with good computing practice, the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. Please note that this message has been sent over public networks which may not be a 100% secure communications Email has been scanned for viruses by Altman Technologies' email management service Cowleysarahcowley183@...http://myprofile.cos.com/S124021COn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

That's funny. I couldn't find much on the SafCare thing either. It's new to me. The thing that leaves me gasping is the sheer size of the US studies and the detailed data they can access. It makes our Millenium Cohort work look really small, but however do they manage if their DPA legislation is akin to the UK Act?

Must chase it up, but my PC is currently having a rebuild so I'm working on an elderly laptop & have to keep loading more coal into it...

PS Apropos US stuff on safeguarding/child protection, there's a couple of interesting keynote speakers at that Ulster conference on risk assessment that I'm attending. Aron Shlonsky and Will are both speaking (pause for frisson of nerdy excitement!). There's also a kind of pre-

conference mini symposium on systematic reviews. http://www.socsci.ulster.ac.uk/irss/dare2012/programme.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Just a quick note, .

The US does not often use small scale studies and their tendency is to fund very large quantitative studies.

The UK weakness, of course, is that we have little research that is generalizable because the input funding is so small and qualitative research is actually more expensive than quantitative studies yet receives less money. The consequence is, generally speaking, too many descriptive and small #s/small scale research projects in the UK.

We're not comparing "like with like" between the UK and the USA whether we're talking about practice in the field or about approaches to research.

All v best,

Diane

Re: Interesting US paper with long term follow up?

That's funny. I couldn't find much on the SafCare thing either. It's new to me. The thing that leaves me gasping is the sheer size of the US studies and the detailed data they can access. It makes our Millenium Cohort work look really small, but however do they manage if their DPA legislation is akin to the UK Act?

Must chase it up, but my PC is currently having a rebuild so I'm working on an elderly laptop & have to keep loading more coal into it...

PS Apropos US stuff on safeguarding/child protection, there's a couple of interesting keynote speakers at that Ulster conference on risk assessment that I'm attending. Aron Shlonsky and Will are both speaking (pause for frisson of nerdy excitement!). There's also a kind of pre- conference mini symposium on systematic reviews. http://www.socsci.ulster.ac.uk/irss/dare2012/programme.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Thanks Diane! Your insights are really important here.

Sounds like there are strengths and weaknesses on both sides, doesn't

it? That funding policy would certainly explain some of the greater

investment in some areas in the US since the 1990s. I am looking

forward to that Ulster symposium because we rarely hear both sides of

the argument. 'Messages from Research' in 1995 thought all the US

research was simply too different to mention, but I wouldn't go that

far.

I tried my library access to get the full paper to read, but sadly

all my Uni subs for this journal have a one year embargo, so my

efforts are frustrated for now. Might some kind colleague be able to

share their copy with me?

< >

From: " Diane DeBell " <ddebell@...>

Date sent: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 14:41:05 +0100

Subject: Re: Interesting US paper with long term follow up?

Send reply to:

Just a quick note, .

The US does not often use small scale studies and their tendency is

to fund very large quantitative studies.

The UK weakness, of course, is that we have little research that is

generalizable because the input funding is so small and qualitative

research is actually more expensive than quantitative studies yet

receives less money. The consequence is, generally speaking, too many

descriptive and small #s/small scale research projects in the UK.

We're not comparing " like with like " between the UK and the USA

whether we're talking about practice in the field or about approaches

to research.

All v best,

Diane

Re: Interesting US paper with long term follow

up?

That's funny. I couldn't find much on the SafCare thing either. It's

new to me. The thing that leaves me gasping is the sheer size of the

US studies and the detailed data they can access. It makes our

Millenium Cohort work look really small, but however do they manage

if their DPA legislation is akin to the UK Act?

Must chase it up, but my PC is currently having a rebuild so I'm

working on an elderly laptop & have to keep loading more coal into

it...

PS Apropos US stuff on safeguarding/child protection, there's a

couple of interesting keynote speakers at that Ulster conference on

risk assessment that I'm attending. Aron Shlonsky and Will

are both speaking (pause for frisson of nerdy excitement!). There's

also a kind of pre- conference mini symposium on systematic reviews.

http://www.socsci.ulster.ac.uk/irss/dare2012/programme.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hello ,

I don't know exactly which journal article you're referring to but, if you can let me know, I'll try to find it for you.

A last thing to say about US research is that it is very, very professional in design and in execution.

It's also the case that, in the USA the work of school nurses is virtually entirely medical; there is little or no health visiting style work; and social workers are, on the whole, employed in the private sector. We also forget that school counsellors (trained as child counsellors in undergraduate degrees) are the mainstay of support in schools.

As you imply, the fact that both countries use the English language does not mean that they function with anything like the same services. But we have much to learn from each other.

Ulster sounds like a v good conference.

All good wishes,

Diane

Re: Interesting US paper with long term follow up?That's funny. I couldn't find much on the SafCare thing either. It's new to me. The thing that leaves me gasping is the sheer size of the US studies and the detailed data they can access. It makes our Millenium Cohort work look really small, but however do they manage if their DPA legislation is akin to the UK Act?Must chase it up, but my PC is currently having a rebuild so I'm working on an elderly laptop & have to keep loading more coal into it...PS Apropos US stuff on safeguarding/child protection, there's a couple of interesting keynote speakers at that Ulster conference on risk assessment that I'm attending. Aron Shlonsky and Will are both speaking (pause for frisson of nerdy excitement!). There's also a kind of pre- conference mini symposium on systematic reviews. http://www.socsci.ulster.ac.uk/irss/dare2012/programme.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Thanks so much, Diane - I have now been able to get access to that

paper on the SafeCare work. My University library access gets

terminated altogether this month, so these things feel a bit awkward.

It's daft to expect evidence based practice from professionals who

don't have access to the evidence!

The US system points are crucial and important for us when we read US

research publications. I never read or thought much about school

counsellors, but they sound really important. There's a bit of a

problem for children and young people seeking to access health care

except through a parent or guardian. Once you're 16, it becomes

legally clearer, but before then you've only got to look at the

tabloid press awfulling about contraceptive & sexual health services

for <16s to realise that negotiating confidential access can be

tricky.

School nursing here is also a variable range of services, with some

absolutely amazing practice ... and some rather medically constrained

work too. In much of Wales, where I used to work, there weren't any

school nurses at all and the HVs were expected to cover the work with

older children & their families. Given the case loads of young

families, you can imagine how that worked out! I also saw some

excellent practice supporting children with long term health problems

in schools, both mainstream and specialist.

I did a formal search in 2007-8 for some material on risk assessment

in child protection practice and found a remarkable difference

between approaches in the UK and Europe and north America. It's

still an area which interests me very much. We do need to learn from

each other's findings, even though the practice & funding systems are

so different. I wish we could replicate some of the large scale

work, but we don't have the same anonymous datasets. The work by the

Children's Research Center is pretty amazing.

< >

From: " Diane DeBell " <ddebell@...>

Date sent: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 08:06:32 +0100

Subject: Re: Interesting US paper with long term follow up?

Send reply to:

Hello ,

I don't know exactly which journal article you're referring to but,

if you can let me know, I'll try to find it for you.

A last thing to say about US research is that it is very, very

professional in design and in execution.

It's also the case that, in the USA the work of school nurses is

virtually entirely medical; there is little or no health visiting

style work; and social workers are, on the whole, employed in the

private sector. We also forget that school counsellors (trained as

child counsellors in undergraduate degrees) are the mainstay of

support in schools.

As you imply, the fact that both countries use the English language

does not mean that they function with anything like the same

services. But we have much to learn from each other.

Ulster sounds like a v good conference.

All good wishes,

Diane

Re: Interesting US paper with long term follow

up?

That's funny. I couldn't find much on the SafCare thing either. It's

new to me. The thing that leaves me gasping is the sheer size of the

US studies and the detailed data they can access. It makes our

Millenium Cohort work look really small, but however do they manage

if their DPA legislation is akin to the UK Act?

Must chase it up, but my PC is currently having a rebuild so I'm

working on an elderly laptop & have to keep loading more coal into

it...

PS Apropos US stuff on safeguarding/child protection, there's a

couple of interesting keynote speakers at that Ulster conference on

risk assessment that I'm attending. Aron Shlonsky and Will

are both speaking (pause for frisson of nerdy excitement!). There's

also a kind of pre- conference mini symposium on systematic reviews.

http://www.socsci.ulster.ac.uk/irss/dare2012/programme.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...