Guest guest Posted January 8, 2012 Report Share Posted January 8, 2012 Dear allI am contributing to a response to the NMC, who are currently collecting evidence to inform their forthcoming review of the 3rd part/SCPHN part of the register. There are asking four questions, and I would be interested in hearing views and (prefereably) any evidence that anyone can identify to pass on. 1. Do we need separate regulation for health visiting in terms of public protection, what is not provided by the nursing or midwifery register? 2. Should health visiting be treated as a separate entity, that is a distinct profession within the NMC? (evidence/views from the profession) 3. How do health visitors (and others) feel about the SCPHN title and training? Is it meeting their needs as it is? If not, why not? 4. What evidence would you suggest for maintaining the title Health Visitor, rather than as some are apparently suggesting, referring to health visitors as public health nurses.best wishes Cowleysarahcowley183@...http://myprofile.cos.com/S124021COn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.