Guest guest Posted June 22, 2001 Report Share Posted June 22, 2001 Green: < Did not the Soviets and East Germans recommend 80-150 meters for speed-endurance of 100 meter athletes?> Carlo: Speed-endurance for a 100m specialized athlete is mainly trained with those distances, yet you don't use just those year-round. <While we are on the topic of training to enhance sprinting speed, it might be useful to compare the different approaches used by various speed coaches? > Carlo: has a classical approach to periodization, Pfaff, too, as far as annual plan, but more " Bondarchuk-like " when it comes to the periodization of biomotor abilities (i.e. starts to work on power from day one). Francis has that very specialized approach which starts with shorter sprints and then " stretches " them to overdistance which I would be curious to know if anybody of the list had success using with low or mid level sprinters. <Did Poliquin successfully train explosive athletes like these?> Carlo: As far as I know Poliquin is the strength coach of Nanceen (part of the 4x200 World Record holder US " Blue " team). Kim Goss: < But is running 400 meters improving the speed-endurance in the fibers you want to train? It seems it would be better to run repeat 20-50 meter sprints. This is what Charlie Francis did with his athletes..> Carlo: I think this approach would be valid only for an advanced sprinter specialized in the 100m, although it seems quite restricting as far as training tools; i.e. if we use 20-50m to train speed- endurance, what do we use to train maximal speed and starts? We end up doing the same things 6 times a week, just changing the rest periods and may be the intensity. In fact, for what I know, Francis begins to work on speed-endurance after the indoor season and does it with 80-150m repeats. Also the dynamics of lactic acid build-up are different between short reps and longer ones (there is a difference between running a 40m dash with high lactate and feeling it shooting up in a 150+m run), furthermore, if it's true that you can get high levels of lactate from shorter reps, the number of reps and the intensity required would make it a very taxing session for the CNS. I think it's hard to transfer the very same training philosophies we use for strength training to short sprints: there are technical, physiological and psycological components that make this not so fruitful. Francis' approach is a system that, in my opinion, we can't just take in parts, without the enphasis he puts on regenerative methods, it brings rapidly to CNS burnouts. Hope this helps. Best, Carlo Buzzichelli Siena, Italy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.