Re: Iggy : More good news, I have lost over thirty pounds...

[Guest guest]

It is sooooooo hard to sue a doctor. I would think about that twice, then

think again.

Lynda

At 08:18 AM 9/24/2004, you wrote:

>You could probably claim malpractice if the doctor knew the valves

>were defective and put them in anyway, also if they caused physical

>harm during the procedure. Your attorney will probably pull all

>your medical records and have a medical expert review them. Based

>on that, then they'll most likely decide which way to tackle it. If

>your valves were defective and you have proof of that, then most

>likely you will have a product liability case. Check on the statues

>for your state and make sure you file before they run out. Your

>statue begins when you knew or should have known it was the implants.

>

>Hugs,

>Beth

>

>

>

>--- In , " iggyangel7 " <iggyangel@c...>

>wrote:

> > --- I think you're right, it does sound kind of strange to me to

>go

> > for malpractice, cuz that would just be the doc right? Or unless

>you

> > could go after the manufacterers for the liability of the

>product...

> > I have not heard anything from this guy yet, so who knows... I

>agree

> > w/you, thanks to this site for all the support and help, I would

>of

> > not of made it.... thanks Beth, Iggy

> > In , " bethlakey " <bethlakey@y...>

>wrote:

> > > Iggy,

> > >

> > > Good luck with that. I would think you would have a good

>product

> > > liability case based on the valve issues. I think medical

> > > malpractice would be harder to prove, unless that doctor did

> > > something wrong such as fail to detect bad valves, things like

> > that.

> > >

> > > Right now, I'm wondering how effective Blais's reports will be

>in a

> > > court of law. I'm praying they will be taken seriously.

> > >

> > > Also, thanks to Patty and all the women who have suffered so and

> > > started this site. It was their research and postings which led

>me

> > > to document every doctor visit and every lab test, early on. If

>my

> > > own case works out, it will be in part to everything they did to

> > > make it easier for us to get help. Eventually I do believe we

>will

> > > see class action suits with the salines.

> > >

> > >

> > > hugs,

> > > Beth L.

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

--- Thanks for the info,

It is hard to sue a doc, cuz I think I probably signed a paper to not

make him liable for any problems,,, most do this to cover their

a####. But I know I do have a suit against the manufacturers... this

attorney has not gotten back w/me yet... Im not surprised, I dont

have much faith in the Legal system,,,, but I will not give up,,, cuz

If I can get a suit, it will go on public record cuz its public

information from what I hear... so that would be a great hurdle just

to publicize the horror of these implants, and what can happen....

Blessings, Iggy

So if nothing happens, at least one voice was heard and made public...

In , Lynda <coss@p...> wrote:

> It is sooooooo hard to sue a doctor. I would think about that

twice, then

> think again.

>

> Lynda

>

>

> At 08:18 AM 9/24/2004, you wrote:

> >You could probably claim malpractice if the doctor knew the valves

> >were defective and put them in anyway, also if they caused physical

> >harm during the procedure. Your attorney will probably pull all

> >your medical records and have a medical expert review them. Based

> >on that, then they'll most likely decide which way to tackle it.

If

> >your valves were defective and you have proof of that, then most

> >likely you will have a product liability case. Check on the

statues

> >for your state and make sure you file before they run out. Your

> >statue begins when you knew or should have known it was the

implants.

> >

> >Hugs,

> >Beth

> >

> >

> >

> >--- In , " iggyangel7 " <iggyangel@c...>

> >wrote:

> > > --- I think you're right, it does sound kind of strange to me to

> >go

> > > for malpractice, cuz that would just be the doc right? Or

unless

> >you

> > > could go after the manufacterers for the liability of the

> >product...

> > > I have not heard anything from this guy yet, so who knows... I

> >agree

> > > w/you, thanks to this site for all the support and help, I would

> >of

> > > not of made it.... thanks Beth, Iggy

> > > In , " bethlakey " <bethlakey@y...>

> >wrote:

> > > > Iggy,

> > > >

> > > > Good luck with that. I would think you would have a good

> >product

> > > > liability case based on the valve issues. I think medical

> > > > malpractice would be harder to prove, unless that doctor did

> > > > something wrong such as fail to detect bad valves, things like

> > > that.

> > > >

> > > > Right now, I'm wondering how effective Blais's reports will be

> >in a

> > > > court of law. I'm praying they will be taken seriously.

> > > >

> > > > Also, thanks to Patty and all the women who have suffered so

and

> > > > started this site. It was their research and postings which

led

> >me

> > > > to document every doctor visit and every lab test, early on.

If

> >my

> > > > own case works out, it will be in part to everything they did

to

> > > > make it easier for us to get help. Eventually I do believe we

> >will

> > > > see class action suits with the salines.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > hugs,

> > > > Beth L.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >