Re: Cell phone radiation and cancer

[Guest guest]

Anything contrary to to the way things are done suffers from the pressure of

economic interests.

Western culture is committed to radio and radar and other applications of

electromagnetic radiation be that communication with a cell phone or cooking

with microwaves.

 

To get people to examine what they do - almost impossible. Even with studies

showing microwave ovens destroy lipids

we see no reaction from the populace. Studies showing yeast adversely responding

to radio waves at 1/10,000 the level from your phone are ignored. The Federal

government only considers thermal effects. As long as it doesn't cook you on the

spot

you are considered safe. As a safety standard this is irrational.

....  How beautiful it is to do nothing, then rest afterwards

    

________________________________

From: stardora <stardora@...>

Undisclosed-Recipient@...

Cc: Longevity

Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 12:29 PM

Subject: Cell phone radiation and cancer

Cell phone radiation and cancer: Just how much more proof do you need?

Wednesday, April 18, 2012 by: Lloyd Burrell

http://www.naturalnews.com/035602_cell_phones_radiation_cancer.html#ixzz1sQCcwMf\

k

(NaturalNews) Cell phones emit a dangerous non-ionizing form of

electromagnetic radiation; radiation which can be absorbed by the tissues

and cells which come into close contact with the phone, e.g., the head and

neck. Scientific studies in the past have produced conflicting results;

however, more recent studies working with long term exposure, (ten years or

more), have clearly established that a link between cell phone use and

certain forms of cancer exists.

Scientific proof

Drs. Lai and Singh (University of Washington) were the first to use the

comet assay in rats to show DNA damage, double strand breaks, after being

exposed to cell phone radiation. The comet assay is one of the most

conclusive tests available to measure the fragmentation of DNA.

Their work coincides with the findings of Dr. Goldsworthy, MSc PhD,

in The Biological Effects of Weak Electromagnetic Fields, from March 2012.

Dr. Goldsworthy concludes that, " If similar DNA fragmentation were to occur

in the whole organism, we would expect an increased risk of cancer, since

essential genes that control cell division may be either damaged or lost. "

Current studies looking at the incidence of brain cancer are backing this

up. Using the cell phone on a regular basis almost doubles the chance of

adult brain cancers on the side of the head used for talking on the phone.

Cancers are not just confined to the brain. Cancers of the parotid salivary

gland and the thyroid gland, located in the neck, are on the rise too.

Capitol Hill

In 2009 on Capitol Hill, several well respected experts testified on the

potential health effects for cell phone users (270 million), in front of the

Senate Appropriations Subcommittee.

.. Dr. Bucher, Associate Director of the National Institutes of Health,

National toxicology program, testified, " As of now, with only 10-12 years

exposure, and use increasing dramatically, there is a concern of increase in

brain cancer, related to use. Children have a configuration of the skull

which allows deeper penetration of cell phone radiation with a potentially

greater risk. "

.. Dr. Siegal Sadetzki, Cancer and radiation epidemiology director of the

Chaim Sheba Medical Center, (Israel) conducted 10 years of research in this

area and published findings in 2008 on the findings of salivary gland tumors

with heavy usage. Dr. Sadetski saw consistent positive results and observed

the tumors always appeared on the same side of the head where the phone was

held.

.. Dr. Devra Lee , University of Pittsburgh, epidemiology professor,

cited Dr. Leonard Hardell's work in Sweden on heavy cell phone use before

age 20. " As adults these subjects had 4-6 times more brain tumors by the

time they reached their 30s. For younger people, the risk increases to five

times more. " Dr. goes on to testify, " If we tie in Dr. Lai and Dr.

Singh's work with the human studies of Dr. Sadetski and others that have

looked at people who have ten years of exposure or more, we have strong

evidence. "

.. Dr. also recommends holding a cell phone no closer than one inch to

your body. Her suggestion comes straight out of the manual for the

Blackberry and iPhone. " I am calling for warning labels. I am simply calling

to codify what the industry is currently telling us about cell phones. "

A final consideration: Dr. Lai came to the conclusion that certain findings

coincided with who was backing the study financially. Almost seventy percent

of the studies sponsored outside the industry showed a connection between

cell phone use and health complications while less than 30% of the studies

sponsored by the cell phone industry reported similar findings.

Sources for this article include:

http://www.magdahavas.com/wireless-concerns-at-lakehead-university/

http://inthesenewtimes.com

[Guest guest]

Yes, well this is not going to be a slow awakening as with cigarettes for

example. There will be a huge 'storm' of cancers including brain cancers and the

ones whom are left admittedly will not be dead - just greatly lowered in

intelligence because of all the dead neurons caused by the frequencies.

Already in the last 7 months more people whom I know have died from cancer then

I have come across in my whole life. Most of them died within only 3 months of

learning that they had cancer. Even one of my neighbors has brain cancer plus is

now blind from cataracts on both eyes. Her husband is an electrician and used

to work for the hydro company -- I remember back last September when he told me

that he had been told that the smart meters were not harmful...........In my

perception it is him that should have the brain cancer and cataracts, not her.

The lawds save me from those people whom seem to have traded thinking

brains for a fantasy world.

blessings

Shan

>

> Anything contrary to to the way things are done suffers from the pressure of

economic interests.

> Western culture is committed to radio and radar and other applications of

electromagnetic radiation be that communication with a cell phone or cooking

with microwaves.

>  

> To get people to examine what they do - almost impossible. Even with studies

showing microwave ovens destroy lipids

> we see no reaction from the populace. Studies showing yeast adversely

responding to radio waves at 1/10,000 the level from your phone are ignored. The

Federal government only considers thermal effects. As long as it doesn't cook

you on the spot

> you are considered safe. As a safety standard this is irrational.

>

> ...  How beautiful it is to do nothing, then rest afterwards

>     

>

>

> ________________________________

> From: stardora <stardora@...>

> Undisclosed-Recipient@...

> Cc: Longevity

> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 12:29 PM

> Subject: Cell phone radiation and cancer

>

> Cell phone radiation and cancer: Just how much more proof do you need?

> Wednesday, April 18, 2012 by: Lloyd Burrell

>

>

http://www.naturalnews.com/035602_cell_phones_radiation_cancer.html#ixzz1sQCcwMf\

k

>

> (NaturalNews) Cell phones emit a dangerous non-ionizing form of

> electromagnetic radiation; radiation which can be absorbed by the tissues

> and cells which come into close contact with the phone, e.g., the head and

> neck. Scientific studies in the past have produced conflicting results;

> however, more recent studies working with long term exposure, (ten years or

> more), have clearly established that a link between cell phone use and

> certain forms of cancer exists.

>

>

>

> Scientific proof

> Drs. Lai and Singh (University of Washington) were the first to use the

> comet assay in rats to show DNA damage, double strand breaks, after being

> exposed to cell phone radiation. The comet assay is one of the most

> conclusive tests available to measure the fragmentation of DNA.

>

> Their work coincides with the findings of Dr. Goldsworthy, MSc PhD,

> in The Biological Effects of Weak Electromagnetic Fields, from March 2012.

> Dr. Goldsworthy concludes that, " If similar DNA fragmentation were to occur

> in the whole organism, we would expect an increased risk of cancer, since

> essential genes that control cell division may be either damaged or lost. "

>

> Current studies looking at the incidence of brain cancer are backing this

> up. Using the cell phone on a regular basis almost doubles the chance of

> adult brain cancers on the side of the head used for talking on the phone.

> Cancers are not just confined to the brain. Cancers of the parotid salivary

> gland and the thyroid gland, located in the neck, are on the rise too.

>

>

>

> Capitol Hill

> In 2009 on Capitol Hill, several well respected experts testified on the

> potential health effects for cell phone users (270 million), in front of the

> Senate Appropriations Subcommittee.

>

> . Dr. Bucher, Associate Director of the National Institutes of Health,

> National toxicology program, testified, " As of now, with only 10-12 years

> exposure, and use increasing dramatically, there is a concern of increase in

> brain cancer, related to use. Children have a configuration of the skull

> which allows deeper penetration of cell phone radiation with a potentially

> greater risk. "

> . Dr. Siegal Sadetzki, Cancer and radiation epidemiology director of the

> Chaim Sheba Medical Center, (Israel) conducted 10 years of research in this

> area and published findings in 2008 on the findings of salivary gland tumors

> with heavy usage. Dr. Sadetski saw consistent positive results and observed

> the tumors always appeared on the same side of the head where the phone was

> held.

> . Dr. Devra Lee , University of Pittsburgh, epidemiology professor,

> cited Dr. Leonard Hardell's work in Sweden on heavy cell phone use before

> age 20. " As adults these subjects had 4-6 times more brain tumors by the

> time they reached their 30s. For younger people, the risk increases to five

> times more. " Dr. goes on to testify, " If we tie in Dr. Lai and Dr.

> Singh's work with the human studies of Dr. Sadetski and others that have

> looked at people who have ten years of exposure or more, we have strong

> evidence. "

> . Dr. also recommends holding a cell phone no closer than one inch to

> your body. Her suggestion comes straight out of the manual for the

> Blackberry and iPhone. " I am calling for warning labels. I am simply calling

> to codify what the industry is currently telling us about cell phones. "

>

> A final consideration: Dr. Lai came to the conclusion that certain findings

> coincided with who was backing the study financially. Almost seventy percent

> of the studies sponsored outside the industry showed a connection between

> cell phone use and health complications while less than 30% of the studies

> sponsored by the cell phone industry reported similar findings.

>

> Sources for this article include:

>

> http://www.magdahavas.com/wireless-concerns-at-lakehead-university/

>

> http://inthesenewtimes.com

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>