Guest guest Posted July 1, 2012 Report Share Posted July 1, 2012 If the pictures did not get accepted by , go to the url underneath the title of the article.   I have also put this on a Word document -- email me if you would like it                     blessings                        Shan Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Low-level lighttherapy aids traumatic brain injury http://spie.org/x47857.xml Hamblin, Ying-Ying Huang, Quihe Wu, Weijun Xuan,Takahiro Ando, Tao Xu, Sulbha Sharma and Gitika Kharkwal  One exposure toa near-IR laser four hours after a head trauma significantly improvesneurological performance and reduces lesion size.  5 May 2011, SPIE Newsroom. Traumaticbrain injury (TBI) caused by falls, motor vehicle accidents, and violence leadsto skull fractures, intracranial hemorrhages, elevated intracranial pressure,and cerebral contusion. Severe and moderate TBI, accidental or inflicted, is amajor health and socio-economic problem throughout the world, especially inchildren and young adults. Despite promisingpreclinical data, most therapeutic trials for TBI performed in recent yearshave not demonstrated any significant improvement in outcomes.1 Because of thisdisappointing state of affairs, a plethora of experimental therapies that arenot based on standard pharmaceutical agents have been investigated,2 including severalphysical treatments.3 Low-level lasertherapy (LLLT), also known as photobiomodulation,is an emerging therapeutic approach in which cells or tissues are exposed to low-levels of red and near-IR light. Itsexperimental applications have broadenedto include serious diseases such as heartattack,4stroke,5 and spinal cord injury.6 LLLT may havebeneficial effects in the acute treatmentof TBI by increasing mitochondrial respiration, activating transcriptionfactors, reducing key inflammatory mediators, inhibiting apoptosis (programmedcell death), stimulating angiogenesis, and increasing neurogenesis7 (see Figure 1). Figure 1. Possible mechanisms of transcraniallow-level laser therapy (LLLT) for traumatic brain injury (TBI). Mitochondrialsignaling causes increased neuronal survival; lowered edema, inflammation andexcitotoxicity; and increased angiogenesis, neurotrophins, and neuralprogenitor cells. ROS: Reactive oxygen species. NO: Nitric oxide. NGF: Nervegrowth factor. BDNF: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor. NT-3: Neurotrophin-3.  We studied the effect of an 810nm laser on several cellular processes in primary corticalneurons cultured from mouse embryonic brains. We found that at low fluences(0.3–3Jcm2) mitochondrial respiration was stimulated, as shown bythe increase in adenosine triphosphate (ATP), Ca2+, andmitochondrial membrane potential. This, in turn, generated low amounts ofreactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO) that activated signalingpathways and gene transcription without causing cytotoxicity (see Figure 2). At 10J/cm2, thestimulation of these parameters was reduced because instead of activatingmitochondrial respiration, they damaged enzymes. At 30J/cm2, severemitochondrial damage occurred, leading to a second large release of ROS and NOand presumably apoptosis and cytotoxicity (although this study did not makethose measurements).8   Figure 2. Effectof 810nm laser on levels of reactive oxygen species (A-C), nitric oxiderelease (D-F), intracellular calcium (G-I), mitochondrial membrane potential(J-L), and adenosine triphosphate (M) in primary cultured mouse corticalneurons.   We also tested LLLT in two mouse models of TBI. In a closedhead-impact model, the scalp is opened surgically and a weight dropped onto theexposed skull followed by scalp closure. We tested four different laserwavelengths using exactly the same laser parameters in each case (spot-size,fluence, and irradiance). The data in Figure 3 show that beginning on day 5 forthe 810nm laser and day 9 for 665nm one, there was a significantdifference in the neurological severity score (NSS) of the LLLT group comparedto the control. The improvement became relatively larger and more significantas time progressed. Although there was a trend towards improvement at middletime points, with the 980nm laser itnever became significant and in the case of the 730nm laser there was no improvement at all.9 The controlled corticalimpact model involves opening the scalp and using a trephine to create acraniotomy and expose the dura. A hydraulic piston was then used to form acontrolled lesion in the cortex. Figure 4 shows LLLT may reduce the braindamage area (stained withtriphenyltetrazolium chloride) at three days.  Figure 3. Neurological severity scores (NSS) over four weeks of mousegroups with closed head TBI treated with a single exposure to lasers ofdifferent wavelengths (36J/cm2at 150mW/cm2) four hoursafter TBI.    Figure 4. Triphenyltetrazolium chloride (viabilitystaining) of controlled cortical impact TBI model treated with LLLT.   The remarkable effects of LLLT in remedying central nervous system (CNS) damage in a non-invasive mannerwith little evidence of any adverse side effects suggest that its applicationwill only increase. Advances in understanding the molecular and cellular basisfor red and near-IR light on cellsand tissues will only serve to increase the acceptance of LLLT by the medicalprofession at large. If LLLT can make even a small contribution to mitigatingthe loss of life, suffering, disability, and financial burden caused by CNSdisorders, the research efforts will be worthwhile.   Hamblin, Ying-Ying Huang, QuiheWu, Weijun Xuan, Takahiro Ando, Tao Xu, SulbhaSharma, Gitika Kharkwal Massachusetts General Hospital(MGH) Boston, MA Hamblin is a principal investigator at the WellmanCenter for Photomedicine at MGH and anassociate professor of dermatology at Harvard Medical School. His researchprogram in photodynamic therapy and low-level laser therapy is supported by theNational Institutes of Health, Congressionally Directed Medical ResearchPrograms, and Center for Integration of Medicine and Innovative Technology. Hehas published more than 125 peer-reviewed articles.  References:  1. R. K. Narayan, Clinical trials in head injury, JNeurotrauma 19, no. 5, pp. 503-557, 2002.  2. J. S. Jennings, A. M. Gerber, M. L. Vallano,Pharmacological strategies for neuroprotection in traumatic brain injury, MiniRev. Med. Chem. 8, no. 7, pp. 689-701, 2008.  3. K. R. Diller, L. Zhu, Hypothermia therapy for braininjury, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 11, pp. 135-62, 2009.  4. U. Oron, Low-energy laser irradiation reduces formation ofscar tissue after myocardial infarction in rats and dogs, Circulation103, no. 2, pp. 296-301, 2001.  5. Y. Lampl, Laser treatment for stroke, Expert Rev.Neurother. 7, no. 8, pp. 961-5, 2007.  6. X. Wu, 810nm Wavelength light: an effective therapy fortransected or contused rat spinal cord, Lasers Surg. Med. 41, no. 1, pp.36-41, 2009.  7. J. T. Hashmi, Role of Low-Level Laser Therapy inNeurorehabilitation, Phys. Med. & Rehab. 2, pp. S292-S305, 2010.  8. G. B. Kharkwal, Effects of 810nm laser on mouse primarycortical neurons, Proc. SPIE 7887, pp. 788707, 2011. doi:10.1117/12.876664  9. Q. Wu, Low level laser therapy for traumatic brain injury,Proc. SPIE 7552, pp. 755206-1, 2010. doi:10.1117/2.1200906.1669  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.