Re: Re: Studies on Cell Antenna [attachment]

[Guest guest]

You are surprised I don't realise that? ohhh man. I am surprised you

haven't been banned from the list, and your inability to fix the problem,

such as by cutting and pasting into notepad in plain ascii text, then

cleaning the document if necessary, then pasting.

On Jul 23, 2012 10:00 PM, " bestsurprise2 " <surpriseshan2@...> wrote:

> **

>

>

> I have Internet Explorer 9 on my computer.

> I use a program called email stripper to clean the articles, and then I

> copy the cleaned article onto an email --- sometimes I copy the article to

> a Word document first and then copy the article to the email. I have no

> idea where this stuff about Microsoft explorer 4 comes from. In any case I

> posted this to 6 different groups and it got that stuff on it in 2 groups

> only. Part of how an email comes out is due to how the group is set

> up...........I am surprised that you don't realize that.

> Shan

>

>

> >

> > > **

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Studies on Cell

> > > Antenna

> > >

> > >

>

http://mybronte.ca/wp/commercial-cell-tower-issue/studies-on-cell-phone-antenna/

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Professor Magda Havas has created a report for us that isspecific to

> our

> > > situation. The towers over the firehall have never hadcommercial towers

> > > placed on it because the International Association ofFire-fighters had

> not

> > > allowed it. Thischange is most unusual and goes against firehall

> policy.

> > > Please read relatedmaterials – Click Here.

> > > The Dangers of Cell Antenna in Residential Neighbourhoods

> > >

> http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Firefighter_sendout.pdf

> > >

> > >

> > > Since the IARC designated cell phone Base Stations (BS) as apossible

> cause

> > > of cancer, (click here to view video from the press conference Normal 0

> > > false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4E2i5XFX9M & feature=youtu.be )

> > > recentstudies have started to appear concerning the negative effects

> from

> > > living inclose proximity to the towers. Just likedamaging cell phone

> > > research was suppressed and took a long time to reach thepublic, (

> Click

> > > here for a Canadian studyon cell phones

> > >

>

http://oem.bmj.com/content/68/9/631.full.pdf+html?sid=ca3ce25f-a8c2-446a-9395-98\

f6b13cfbae

> )

> > > the same is now happening with cell phone towers. Finally, governments

> > > areacting to warn their citizens. Here are a few of the most notable

> well

> > > researched studies that have become available.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Mortality by neoplasia and cellular telephone base stations in the Belo

> > > Horizonte municipality, Minas Gerais state, Brazil

> > > Published Sept 2011.

> > > This well funded study was done by the Municipal Governmentof Belo

> > > Horizonte, Municipal Health Department, Belo Horizonte City, Minas

> Gerais

> > > State, Brazil. It showed that in personsthat live within 500 meters of

> a

> > > cell antenna base station (BS) there was amuch higher death rate from

> > > neoplasia which is the abnormal proliferation ofbenign or malignant

> cells

> > > which cause tumours.

> > >

> > > Abstract

> > > Pollution caused by the electromagnetic fields (EMFs) ofradio

> frequencies

> > > (RF) generated by the telecommunication system is one of thegreatest

> > > environmental problems of the twentieth century. The purpose of

> > > thisresearch was to verify the existence of a spatial correlation

> between

> > > basestation (BS) clusters and cases of deaths by neoplasia in the Belo

> > > Horizonte municipality, Minas Gerais state, Brazil, from1996 to 2006

> and to

> > > measure the human exposure levels to EMF where there is amajor

> > > concentration of cellular telephone transmitter antennas. A

> > > descriptivespatial analysis of the BSs and the cases of death by

> neoplasia

> > > identified inthe municipality was performed through an

> > > ecological–epidemiological approach,using georeferencing. The database

> > > employed in the survey was composed of threedata banks: 1. death by

> > > neoplasia documented by the Health MunicipalDepartment; 2. BSs

> documented

> > > in ANATEL ( " Agência Nacional deTelecomunicações " : `Telecommunications

> > > National Agency'); and 3. census anddemographic city population data

> > > obtained from official archives provided byIBGE ( " Instituto Brasileiro

> de

> > > Geografia e Estatística " : `Brazilian Instituteof Geography and

> > > Statistics'). The results show that approximately 856 BSs wereinstalled

> > > through December 2006. Most (39.60%) of the BSs were located in

> > > the " Centro-Sul " (`Central-Southern') region of the municipality.

> Between

> > > 1996 and2006, 7191 deaths by neoplasia occurred and within an area of

> 500 m

> > > from theBS, the mortality rate was 34.76 per 10,000 inhabitants.

> Outside of

> > > this area, adecrease in the number of deaths by neoplasia occurred. The

> > > greatestaccumulated incidence was 5.83 per 1000 in the Central-Southern

> > > region and thelowest incidence was 2.05 per 1000 in the Barreiroregion.

> > > During the environmental monitoring, the largest accumulated

> electricfield

> > > measured was 12.4 V/m and the smallest was 0.4 V/m. The largest

> > > densitypower was 40.78 ?W/cm2, and the smallest was 0.04 ?W/cm2.

> > >

> > > Conclusions

> > > This research showed the existence of a spatial correlationbetween

> cases

> > > of death by neoplasia and the locations of the BSs, in the Belo

> > > Horizontemunicipality from 1996 to 2006. The mortality rates and the

> > > relative risk werehigher for the residents inside a radius of 500 m

> from

> > > the BS, compared to theaverage mortality rate of the entire city, and a

> > > decreased dose–responsegradient was observed for residents who lived

> > > farther away from the BS. Themajor antenna concentration was located

> in the

> > > Central-Southern SD of the city,which also had the largest accumulated

> > > incidence.

> > > Click here to view

> > > http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969711005754

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Epidemiological Evidence for a Health Risk from Mobile Phone

> BaseStations.

> > > Int J Occup Env Health:16- 3, JUL/SEP 2010, p 263-267.

> > > Khurana V Hardell L Everaert J Bortkiewicz A Carlberg MAhonen M.

> > > Click here for a PDF

> > > http://www.brain-surgery.us/Khurana_et_al_IJOEH-Base_Station_RV.pdf

> > >

> > > Vini Khurana (Australia,neurosurgeon)and Lennart Hardell

> > > (Sweden,oncologist) have published a summary of ten studies that

> reported

> > > healtheffects of populations living near cell towers. They found risks

> for

> > > cancer andneurological disease in eight out of ten studies – within 500

> > > meters of thecell antennas. It is important to remember that not all

> cell

> > > tower antennas arethe same, and the RF exposures around them can vary

> > > widely. Major macrocellsites can emit 6000 watts or more, and smaller

> sites

> > > can be less than 2000 watts.The distance outward from a cell tower that

> > > creates the `zone of RF impact'needs to be assessed on a site-specific

> > > basis.

> > >

> > > Abstract

> > > Human populations are increasingly exposed tomicrowave/radiofrequency

> (RF)

> > > emissions from wireless communication technology,including mobile

> phones

> > > and their base stations. By searching PubMed, weidentified a total of

> 10

> > > epidemiological studies that assessed for putativehealth effects of

> mobile

> > > phone base stations. Seven of these studies exploredthe association

> between

> > > base station proximity and neurobehavioral effects andthree

> investigated

> > > cancer. We found that eight of the 10 studies reportedincreased

> prevalence

> > > of adverse neurobehavioral symptoms or cancer inpopulations living at

> > > distances & lt; 500 meters from base stations. None of thestudies

> reported

> > > exposure above accepted international guidelines, suggestingthat

> current

> > > guidelines may be inadequate in protecting the health of

> humanpopulations.

> > > We believe that comprehensive epidemiological studies of longtermmobile

> > > phone base station exposure are urgently required to more

> > > definitivelyunderstand its health impact.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Specific Health Symptoms and Cell Phone Radiation in Selbitz (Bavaria,

> > > Germany)—Evidenceof a Dose-Response Relationship

> > > In January 2009, 251 Bavarian residents were tested tobefore and after

> a

> > > cell tower was erected in their town. This study shows the changes that

> > > are experiencedby the citizens.

> > > Click here to read thestudy.

> > >

> > >

>

http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Radiation_Germany_2010s-copy.pd\

f

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > How does long term exposure to base stations and mobile phones

> affecthuman

> > > hormone profiles?

> > > This present study revealed that high RFR emitted fromeither mobile

> phone

> > > or base station has tangible effects on pituitary–adrenalaxis

> represented

> > > in the reduction of ACTH and consequently cortisol levels.Also,

> exposure to

> > > RFR is associated with decrease in the release of thyroidhormones.

> > > Click here to read thestudy

> > >

> > >

> http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Hormones_cell_towers-copy.pdf

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > The Influence of Being Physically Near to a Cell Phone

> TransmissionMast on

> > > the Incidence of Cancer

> > > Summary

> > > Following the call by Wolfram König, President of theBundesamt für

> > > Strahlenschutz (Federal Agency for radiation protection), to

> alldoctors of

> > > medicine to collaborate actively in the assessment of the risk posedby

> > > cellular radiation, the aim of our study was to examine whether

> > > peopleliving close to cellular transmitter antennas were exposed to a

> > > heightened riskof taking ill with malignant tumors.

> > >

> > > The basis of the data used for the survey were PC files ofthe case

> > > histories of patients between the years 1994 and 2004. While adheringto

> > > data protection, the personal data of almost 1,000 patients were

> > > evaluatedfor this study, which was completed without any external

> financial

> > > support. Itis intended to continue the project in the form of a

> register.

> > >

> > > The result of the study shows that the proportion of newlydeveloping

> > > cancer cases wassignificantly higher among those patients who had lived

> > > during the past tenyears at a distance of up to 400 metres from the

> > > cellular transmitter site,which has been in operation since 1993,

> compared

> > > to those patients livingfurther away, and that the patients fell ill on

> > > average 8 years earlier.

> > >

> > > In the years 1999-2004, ie after five years' operation ofthe

> transmitting

> > > installation, the relative risk of getting cancer had trebledfor the

> > > residents of the area in the proximity of the installation compared

> tothe

> > > inhabitants of Naila outside the area.

> > > Click Here to readthis study.

> > >

> > >

> http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Cell-towers-cancer-copy.pdf

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Biological effects from exposure to electromagnetic radiation emittedby

> > > cell tower base stations and other antenna arrays. Blake Levitt and

> Henry

> > > Lai

> > > This paper is published by the well respected NationalResearch Council

> of

> > > Canada. The authors of this document are world renownUSscientists and

> > > writers. It's a great over view of the problem that we all face.We just

> > > need to get politicians to act on the research.

> > > Click here to read thestudy

> > > http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/A10-018

> > >

> > >

> > >

[Guest guest]

No, I am saying you should use notepad. You clearly don't understand what I

am saying, or much about word processing.

On Jul 24, 2012 9:24 AM, " bestsurprise2 " <surpriseshan2@...> wrote:

> **

>

>

> Do you always have this difficulty with comprehension? Well that certainly

> explains a lot.

> I did not say anything about notebook etc ......

>

>

> > > >

> > > > > **

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Studies on

> Cell

> > > > > Antenna

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > >

>

http://mybronte.ca/wp/commercial-cell-tower-issue/studies-on-cell-phone-antenna/

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Professor Magda Havas has created a report for us that isspecific

> to

> > > our

> > > > > situation. The towers over the firehall have never hadcommercial

> towers

> > > > > placed on it because the International Association ofFire-fighters

> had

> > > not

> > > > > allowed it. Thischange is most unusual and goes against firehall

> > > policy.

> > > > > Please read relatedmaterials – Click Here.

> > > > > The Dangers of Cell Antenna in Residential Neighbourhoods

> > > > >

> > >

> http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Firefighter_sendout.pdf

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Since the IARC designated cell phone Base Stations (BS) as

> apossible

> > > cause

> > > > > of cancer, (click here to view video from the press conference

> Normal 0

> > > > > false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

> > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4E2i5XFX9M & feature=youtu.be )

> > > > > recentstudies have started to appear concerning the negative

> effects

> > > from

> > > > > living inclose proximity to the towers. Just likedamaging cell

> phone

> > > > > research was suppressed and took a long time to reach thepublic, (

> > > Click

> > > > > here for a Canadian studyon cell phones

> > > > >

> > >

>

http://oem.bmj.com/content/68/9/631.full.pdf+html?sid=ca3ce25f-a8c2-446a-9395-98\

f6b13cfbae

> > > )

> > > > > the same is now happening with cell phone towers. Finally,

> governments

> > > > > areacting to warn their citizens. Here are a few of the most

> notable

> > > well

> > > > > researched studies that have become available.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Mortality by neoplasia and cellular telephone base stations in the

> Belo

> > > > > Horizonte municipality, Minas Gerais state, Brazil

> > > > > Published Sept 2011.

> > > > > This well funded study was done by the Municipal Governmentof Belo

> > > > > Horizonte, Municipal Health Department, Belo Horizonte City, Minas

> > > Gerais

> > > > > State, Brazil. It showed that in personsthat live within 500

> meters of

> > > a

> > > > > cell antenna base station (BS) there was amuch higher death rate

> from

> > > > > neoplasia which is the abnormal proliferation ofbenign or malignant

> > > cells

> > > > > which cause tumours.

> > > > >

> > > > > Abstract

> > > > > Pollution caused by the electromagnetic fields (EMFs) ofradio

> > > frequencies

> > > > > (RF) generated by the telecommunication system is one of

> thegreatest

> > > > > environmental problems of the twentieth century. The purpose of

> > > > > thisresearch was to verify the existence of a spatial correlation

> > > between

> > > > > basestation (BS) clusters and cases of deaths by neoplasia in the

> Belo

> > > > > Horizonte municipality, Minas Gerais state, Brazil, from1996 to

> 2006

> > > and to

> > > > > measure the human exposure levels to EMF where there is amajor

> > > > > concentration of cellular telephone transmitter antennas. A

> > > > > descriptivespatial analysis of the BSs and the cases of death by

> > > neoplasia

> > > > > identified inthe municipality was performed through an

> > > > > ecological–epidemiological approach,using georeferencing. The

> database

> > > > > employed in the survey was composed of threedata banks: 1. death by

> > > > > neoplasia documented by the Health MunicipalDepartment; 2. BSs

> > > documented

> > > > > in ANATEL ( " Agência Nacional deTelecomunicações " :

> `Telecommunications

> > > > > National Agency'); and 3. census anddemographic city population

> data

> > > > > obtained from official archives provided byIBGE ( " Instituto

> Brasileiro

> > > de

> > > > > Geografia e Estatística " : `Brazilian Instituteof Geography and

> > > > > Statistics'). The results show that approximately 856 BSs

> wereinstalled

> > > > > through December 2006. Most (39.60%) of the BSs were located in

> > > > > the " Centro-Sul " (`Central-Southern') region of the municipality.

> > > Between

> > > > > 1996 and2006, 7191 deaths by neoplasia occurred and within an area

> of

> > > 500 m

> > > > > from theBS, the mortality rate was 34.76 per 10,000 inhabitants.

> > > Outside of

> > > > > this area, adecrease in the number of deaths by neoplasia

> occurred. The

> > > > > greatestaccumulated incidence was 5.83 per 1000 in the

> Central-Southern

> > > > > region and thelowest incidence was 2.05 per 1000 in the

> Barreiroregion.

> > > > > During the environmental monitoring, the largest accumulated

> > > electricfield

> > > > > measured was 12.4 V/m and the smallest was 0.4 V/m. The largest

> > > > > densitypower was 40.78 ?W/cm2, and the smallest was 0.04 ?W/cm2.

> > > > >

> > > > > Conclusions

> > > > > This research showed the existence of a spatial correlationbetween

> > > cases

> > > > > of death by neoplasia and the locations of the BSs, in the Belo

> > > > > Horizontemunicipality from 1996 to 2006. The mortality rates and

> the

> > > > > relative risk werehigher for the residents inside a radius of 500 m

> > > from

> > > > > the BS, compared to theaverage mortality rate of the entire city,

> and a

> > > > > decreased dose–responsegradient was observed for residents who

> lived

> > > > > farther away from the BS. Themajor antenna concentration was

> located

> > > in the

> > > > > Central-Southern SD of the city,which also had the largest

> accumulated

> > > > > incidence.

> > > > > Click here to view

> > > > > http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969711005754

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Epidemiological Evidence for a Health Risk from Mobile Phone

> > > BaseStations.

> > > > > Int J Occup Env Health:16- 3, JUL/SEP 2010, p 263-267.

> > > > > Khurana V Hardell L Everaert J Bortkiewicz A Carlberg MAhonen M.

> > > > > Click here for a PDF

> > > > >

> http://www.brain-surgery.us/Khurana_et_al_IJOEH-Base_Station_RV.pdf

> > > > >

> > > > > Vini Khurana (Australia,neurosurgeon)and Lennart Hardell

> > > > > (Sweden,oncologist) have published a summary of ten studies that

> > > reported

> > > > > healtheffects of populations living near cell towers. They found

> risks

> > > for

> > > > > cancer andneurological disease in eight out of ten studies –

> within 500

> > > > > meters of thecell antennas. It is important to remember that not

> all

> > > cell

> > > > > tower antennas arethe same, and the RF exposures around them can

> vary

> > > > > widely. Major macrocellsites can emit 6000 watts or more, and

> smaller

> > > sites

> > > > > can be less than 2000 watts.The distance outward from a cell tower

> that

> > > > > creates the `zone of RF impact'needs to be assessed on a

> site-specific

> > > > > basis.

> > > > >

> > > > > Abstract

> > > > > Human populations are increasingly exposed

> tomicrowave/radiofrequency

> > > (RF)

> > > > > emissions from wireless communication technology,including mobile

> > > phones

> > > > > and their base stations. By searching PubMed, weidentified a total

> of

> > > 10

> > > > > epidemiological studies that assessed for putativehealth effects of

> > > mobile

> > > > > phone base stations. Seven of these studies exploredthe association

> > > between

> > > > > base station proximity and neurobehavioral effects andthree

> > > investigated

> > > > > cancer. We found that eight of the 10 studies reportedincreased

> > > prevalence

> > > > > of adverse neurobehavioral symptoms or cancer inpopulations living

> at

> > > > > distances & lt; 500 meters from base stations. None of thestudies

> > > reported

> > > > > exposure above accepted international guidelines, suggestingthat

> > > current

> > > > > guidelines may be inadequate in protecting the health of

> > > humanpopulations.

> > > > > We believe that comprehensive epidemiological studies of

> longtermmobile

> > > > > phone base station exposure are urgently required to more

> > > > > definitivelyunderstand its health impact.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Specific Health Symptoms and Cell Phone Radiation in Selbitz

> (Bavaria,

> > > > > Germany)—Evidenceof a Dose-Response Relationship

> > > > > In January 2009, 251 Bavarian residents were tested tobefore and

> after

> > > a

> > > > > cell tower was erected in their town. This study shows the changes

> that

> > > > > are experiencedby the citizens.

> > > > > Click here to read thestudy.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > >

>

http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Radiation_Germany_2010s-copy.pd\

f

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > How does long term exposure to base stations and mobile phones

> > > affecthuman

> > > > > hormone profiles?

> > > > > This present study revealed that high RFR emitted fromeither mobile

> > > phone

> > > > > or base station has tangible effects on pituitary–adrenalaxis

> > > represented

> > > > > in the reduction of ACTH and consequently cortisol levels.Also,

> > > exposure to

> > > > > RFR is associated with decrease in the release of thyroidhormones.

> > > > > Click here to read thestudy

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > >

> http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Hormones_cell_towers-copy.pdf

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > The Influence of Being Physically Near to a Cell Phone

> > > TransmissionMast on

> > > > > the Incidence of Cancer

> > > > > Summary

> > > > > Following the call by Wolfram König, President of theBundesamt für

> > > > > Strahlenschutz (Federal Agency for radiation protection), to

> > > alldoctors of

> > > > > medicine to collaborate actively in the assessment of the risk

> posedby

> > > > > cellular radiation, the aim of our study was to examine whether

> > > > > peopleliving close to cellular transmitter antennas were exposed

> to a

> > > > > heightened riskof taking ill with malignant tumors.

> > > > >

> > > > > The basis of the data used for the survey were PC files ofthe case

> > > > > histories of patients between the years 1994 and 2004. While

> adheringto

> > > > > data protection, the personal data of almost 1,000 patients were

> > > > > evaluatedfor this study, which was completed without any external

> > > financial

> > > > > support. Itis intended to continue the project in the form of a

> > > register.

> > > > >

> > > > > The result of the study shows that the proportion of

> newlydeveloping

> > > > > cancer cases wassignificantly higher among those patients who had

> lived

> > > > > during the past tenyears at a distance of up to 400 metres from the

> > > > > cellular transmitter site,which has been in operation since 1993,

> > > compared

> > > > > to those patients livingfurther away, and that the patients fell

> ill on

> > > > > average 8 years earlier.

> > > > >

> > > > > In the years 1999-2004, ie after five years' operation ofthe

> > > transmitting

> > > > > installation, the relative risk of getting cancer had trebledfor

> the

> > > > > residents of the area in the proximity of the installation compared

> > > tothe

> > > > > inhabitants of Naila outside the area.

> > > > > Click Here to readthis study.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > >

> http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Cell-towers-cancer-copy.pdf

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Biological effects from exposure to electromagnetic radiation

> emittedby

> > > > > cell tower base stations and other antenna arrays. Blake Levitt and

> > > Henry

> > > > > Lai

> > > > > This paper is published by the well respected NationalResearch

> Council

> > > of

> > > > > Canada. The authors of this document are world renownUSscientists

> and

> > > > > writers. It's a great over view of the problem that we all face.We

> just

> > > > > need to get politicians to act on the research.

> > > > > Click here to read thestudy

> > > > > http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/A10-018

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

[Guest guest]

Or let me put it another way: show everyone on this list the common

courtesy of not posting ill formatted garbage, regardless of whether or not

the properly formatted text which is intermingled with this garbage is in

itself garbage, which I think is more often the case than not.

On Jul 24, 2012 9:59 AM, " Hamish " <hjooste@...> wrote:

> No, I am saying you should use notepad. You clearly don't understand what

> I am saying, or much about word processing.

> On Jul 24, 2012 9:24 AM, " bestsurprise2 " <surpriseshan2@...> wrote:

>

>> **

>>

>>

>> Do you always have this difficulty with comprehension? Well that

>> certainly explains a lot.

>> I did not say anything about notebook etc ......

>>

>>

>> > > >

>> > > > > **

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > > > > Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Studies on

>> Cell

>> > > > > Antenna

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > >

>>

http://mybronte.ca/wp/commercial-cell-tower-issue/studies-on-cell-phone-antenna/

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > > > > Professor Magda Havas has created a report for us that isspecific

>> to

>> > > our

>> > > > > situation. The towers over the firehall have never hadcommercial

>> towers

>> > > > > placed on it because the International Association

>> ofFire-fighters had

>> > > not

>> > > > > allowed it. Thischange is most unusual and goes against firehall

>> > > policy.

>> > > > > Please read relatedmaterials – Click Here.

>> > > > > The Dangers of Cell Antenna in Residential Neighbourhoods

>> > > > >

>> > >

>> http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Firefighter_sendout.pdf

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > > > > Since the IARC designated cell phone Base Stations (BS) as

>> apossible

>> > > cause

>> > > > > of cancer, (click here to view video from the press conference

>> Normal 0

>> > > > > false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

>> > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4E2i5XFX9M & feature=youtu.be )

>> > > > > recentstudies have started to appear concerning the negative

>> effects

>> > > from

>> > > > > living inclose proximity to the towers. Just likedamaging cell

>> phone

>> > > > > research was suppressed and took a long time to reach thepublic, (

>> > > Click

>> > > > > here for a Canadian studyon cell phones

>> > > > >

>> > >

>>

http://oem.bmj.com/content/68/9/631.full.pdf+html?sid=ca3ce25f-a8c2-446a-9395-98\

f6b13cfbae

>> > > )

>> > > > > the same is now happening with cell phone towers. Finally,

>> governments

>> > > > > areacting to warn their citizens. Here are a few of the most

>> notable

>> > > well

>> > > > > researched studies that have become available.

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > > > > Mortality by neoplasia and cellular telephone base stations in

>> the Belo

>> > > > > Horizonte municipality, Minas Gerais state, Brazil

>> > > > > Published Sept 2011.

>> > > > > This well funded study was done by the Municipal Governmentof Belo

>> > > > > Horizonte, Municipal Health Department, Belo Horizonte City, Minas

>> > > Gerais

>> > > > > State, Brazil. It showed that in personsthat live within 500

>> meters of

>> > > a

>> > > > > cell antenna base station (BS) there was amuch higher death rate

>> from

>> > > > > neoplasia which is the abnormal proliferation ofbenign or

>> malignant

>> > > cells

>> > > > > which cause tumours.

>> > > > >

>> > > > > Abstract

>> > > > > Pollution caused by the electromagnetic fields (EMFs) ofradio

>> > > frequencies

>> > > > > (RF) generated by the telecommunication system is one of

>> thegreatest

>> > > > > environmental problems of the twentieth century. The purpose of

>> > > > > thisresearch was to verify the existence of a spatial correlation

>> > > between

>> > > > > basestation (BS) clusters and cases of deaths by neoplasia in the

>> Belo

>> > > > > Horizonte municipality, Minas Gerais state, Brazil, from1996 to

>> 2006

>> > > and to

>> > > > > measure the human exposure levels to EMF where there is amajor

>> > > > > concentration of cellular telephone transmitter antennas. A

>> > > > > descriptivespatial analysis of the BSs and the cases of death by

>> > > neoplasia

>> > > > > identified inthe municipality was performed through an

>> > > > > ecological–epidemiological approach,using georeferencing. The

>> database

>> > > > > employed in the survey was composed of threedata banks: 1. death

>> by

>> > > > > neoplasia documented by the Health MunicipalDepartment; 2. BSs

>> > > documented

>> > > > > in ANATEL ( " Agência Nacional deTelecomunicações " :

>> `Telecommunications

>> > > > > National Agency'); and 3. census anddemographic city population

>> data

>> > > > > obtained from official archives provided byIBGE ( " Instituto

>> Brasileiro

>> > > de

>> > > > > Geografia e Estatística " : `Brazilian Instituteof Geography and

>> > > > > Statistics'). The results show that approximately 856 BSs

>> wereinstalled

>> > > > > through December 2006. Most (39.60%) of the BSs were located in

>> > > > > the " Centro-Sul " (`Central-Southern') region of the municipality.

>> > > Between

>> > > > > 1996 and2006, 7191 deaths by neoplasia occurred and within an

>> area of

>> > > 500 m

>> > > > > from theBS, the mortality rate was 34.76 per 10,000 inhabitants.

>> > > Outside of

>> > > > > this area, adecrease in the number of deaths by neoplasia

>> occurred. The

>> > > > > greatestaccumulated incidence was 5.83 per 1000 in the

>> Central-Southern

>> > > > > region and thelowest incidence was 2.05 per 1000 in the

>> Barreiroregion.

>> > > > > During the environmental monitoring, the largest accumulated

>> > > electricfield

>> > > > > measured was 12.4 V/m and the smallest was 0.4 V/m. The largest

>> > > > > densitypower was 40.78 ?W/cm2, and the smallest was 0.04 ?W/cm2.

>> > > > >

>> > > > > Conclusions

>> > > > > This research showed the existence of a spatial correlationbetween

>> > > cases

>> > > > > of death by neoplasia and the locations of the BSs, in the Belo

>> > > > > Horizontemunicipality from 1996 to 2006. The mortality rates and

>> the

>> > > > > relative risk werehigher for the residents inside a radius of 500

>> m

>> > > from

>> > > > > the BS, compared to theaverage mortality rate of the entire city,

>> and a

>> > > > > decreased dose–responsegradient was observed for residents who

>> lived

>> > > > > farther away from the BS. Themajor antenna concentration was

>> located

>> > > in the

>> > > > > Central-Southern SD of the city,which also had the largest

>> accumulated

>> > > > > incidence.

>> > > > > Click here to view

>> > > > >

>> http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969711005754

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > > > > Epidemiological Evidence for a Health Risk from Mobile Phone

>> > > BaseStations.

>> > > > > Int J Occup Env Health:16- 3, JUL/SEP 2010, p 263-267.

>> > > > > Khurana V Hardell L Everaert J Bortkiewicz A Carlberg MAhonen M.

>> > > > > Click here for a PDF

>> > > > >

>> http://www.brain-surgery.us/Khurana_et_al_IJOEH-Base_Station_RV.pdf

>> > > > >

>> > > > > Vini Khurana (Australia,neurosurgeon)and Lennart Hardell

>> > > > > (Sweden,oncologist) have published a summary of ten studies that

>> > > reported

>> > > > > healtheffects of populations living near cell towers. They found

>> risks

>> > > for

>> > > > > cancer andneurological disease in eight out of ten studies –

>> within 500

>> > > > > meters of thecell antennas. It is important to remember that not

>> all

>> > > cell

>> > > > > tower antennas arethe same, and the RF exposures around them can

>> vary

>> > > > > widely. Major macrocellsites can emit 6000 watts or more, and

>> smaller

>> > > sites

>> > > > > can be less than 2000 watts.The distance outward from a cell

>> tower that

>> > > > > creates the `zone of RF impact'needs to be assessed on a

>> site-specific

>> > > > > basis.

>> > > > >

>> > > > > Abstract

>> > > > > Human populations are increasingly exposed

>> tomicrowave/radiofrequency

>> > > (RF)

>> > > > > emissions from wireless communication technology,including mobile

>> > > phones

>> > > > > and their base stations. By searching PubMed, weidentified a

>> total of

>> > > 10

>> > > > > epidemiological studies that assessed for putativehealth effects

>> of

>> > > mobile

>> > > > > phone base stations. Seven of these studies exploredthe

>> association

>> > > between

>> > > > > base station proximity and neurobehavioral effects andthree

>> > > investigated

>> > > > > cancer. We found that eight of the 10 studies reportedincreased

>> > > prevalence

>> > > > > of adverse neurobehavioral symptoms or cancer inpopulations

>> living at

>> > > > > distances & lt; 500 meters from base stations. None of thestudies

>> > > reported

>> > > > > exposure above accepted international guidelines, suggestingthat

>> > > current

>> > > > > guidelines may be inadequate in protecting the health of

>> > > humanpopulations.

>> > > > > We believe that comprehensive epidemiological studies of

>> longtermmobile

>> > > > > phone base station exposure are urgently required to more

>> > > > > definitivelyunderstand its health impact.

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > > > > Specific Health Symptoms and Cell Phone Radiation in Selbitz

>> (Bavaria,

>> > > > > Germany)—Evidenceof a Dose-Response Relationship

>> > > > > In January 2009, 251 Bavarian residents were tested tobefore and

>> after

>> > > a

>> > > > > cell tower was erected in their town. This study shows the

>> changes that

>> > > > > are experiencedby the citizens.

>> > > > > Click here to read thestudy.

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > >

>>

http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Radiation_Germany_2010s-copy.pd\

f

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > > > > How does long term exposure to base stations and mobile phones

>> > > affecthuman

>> > > > > hormone profiles?

>> > > > > This present study revealed that high RFR emitted fromeither

>> mobile

>> > > phone

>> > > > > or base station has tangible effects on pituitary–adrenalaxis

>> > > represented

>> > > > > in the reduction of ACTH and consequently cortisol levels.Also,

>> > > exposure to

>> > > > > RFR is associated with decrease in the release of thyroidhormones.

>> > > > > Click here to read thestudy

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > >

>>

http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Hormones_cell_towers-copy.pdf

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > > > > The Influence of Being Physically Near to a Cell Phone

>> > > TransmissionMast on

>> > > > > the Incidence of Cancer

>> > > > > Summary

>> > > > > Following the call by Wolfram König, President of theBundesamt für

>> > > > > Strahlenschutz (Federal Agency for radiation protection), to

>> > > alldoctors of

>> > > > > medicine to collaborate actively in the assessment of the risk

>> posedby

>> > > > > cellular radiation, the aim of our study was to examine whether

>> > > > > peopleliving close to cellular transmitter antennas were exposed

>> to a

>> > > > > heightened riskof taking ill with malignant tumors.

>> > > > >

>> > > > > The basis of the data used for the survey were PC files ofthe case

>> > > > > histories of patients between the years 1994 and 2004. While

>> adheringto

>> > > > > data protection, the personal data of almost 1,000 patients were

>> > > > > evaluatedfor this study, which was completed without any external

>> > > financial

>> > > > > support. Itis intended to continue the project in the form of a

>> > > register.

>> > > > >

>> > > > > The result of the study shows that the proportion of

>> newlydeveloping

>> > > > > cancer cases wassignificantly higher among those patients who had

>> lived

>> > > > > during the past tenyears at a distance of up to 400 metres from

>> the

>> > > > > cellular transmitter site,which has been in operation since 1993,

>> > > compared

>> > > > > to those patients livingfurther away, and that the patients fell

>> ill on

>> > > > > average 8 years earlier.

>> > > > >

>> > > > > In the years 1999-2004, ie after five years' operation ofthe

>> > > transmitting

>> > > > > installation, the relative risk of getting cancer had trebledfor

>> the

>> > > > > residents of the area in the proximity of the installation

>> compared

>> > > tothe

>> > > > > inhabitants of Naila outside the area.

>> > > > > Click Here to readthis study.

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > >

>> http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Cell-towers-cancer-copy.pdf

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > > > > Biological effects from exposure to electromagnetic radiation

>> emittedby

>> > > > > cell tower base stations and other antenna arrays. Blake Levitt

>> and

>> > > Henry

>> > > > > Lai

>> > > > > This paper is published by the well respected NationalResearch

>> Council

>> > > of

>> > > > > Canada. The authors of this document are world renownUSscientists

>> and

>> > > > > writers. It's a great over view of the problem that we all

>> face.We just

>> > > > > need to get politicians to act on the research.

>> > > > > Click here to read thestudy

>> > > > > http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/A10-018

>> > > > >

>> > > > >

>> > > > >