Studies on Cell Antenna [attachment]

[Guest guest]

Normal 0 false false false

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Studies on Cell Antenna

http://mybronte.ca/wp/commercial-cell-tower-issue/studies-on-cell-phone-antenna/

 

 

Professor Magda Havas has created a report for us that isspecific to our

situation. The towers over the firehall have never hadcommercial towers placed

on it because the International Association ofFire-fighters had not allowed

it.  Thischange is most unusual and goes against firehall policy.

Please read relatedmaterials – Click Here.

The Dangers of Cell Antenna in Residential Neighbourhoods

http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Firefighter_sendout.pdf

 

Since the IARC designated cell phone Base Stations (BS) as apossible cause of

cancer, (click here to view video from the press conference  Normal 0

false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4E2i5XFX9M & feature=youtu.be  ) recentstudies

have started to appear concerning the negative effects from living inclose

proximity to the towers.  Just likedamaging cell phone research was suppressed

and took a long time to reach thepublic, ( Click here for a Canadian studyon

cell phones

http://oem.bmj.com/content/68/9/631.full.pdf+html?sid=ca3ce25f-a8c2-446a-9395-98\

f6b13cfbae) the same is now happening with cell phone towers. Finally,

governments areacting to warn their citizens. Here are a few of the most notable

well researched studies that have become available.

 

 

Mortality by neoplasia and cellular telephone base stations in the Belo

Horizonte municipality, Minas Gerais state, Brazil

Published Sept 2011.

This well funded study was done by the Municipal Governmentof Belo Horizonte,

Municipal Health Department, Belo Horizonte City, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. It

showed that in personsthat live within 500 meters of a cell antenna base station

(BS) there was amuch higher death rate from neoplasia which is the abnormal

proliferation ofbenign or malignant cells which cause tumours.

 

Abstract

Pollution caused by the electromagnetic fields (EMFs) ofradio frequencies (RF)

generated by the telecommunication system is one of thegreatest environmental

problems of the twentieth century. The purpose of thisresearch was to verify the

existence of a spatial correlation between basestation (BS) clusters and cases

of deaths by neoplasia in the Belo Horizonte municipality, Minas Gerais state,

Brazil, from1996 to 2006 and to measure the human exposure levels to EMF where

there is amajor concentration of cellular telephone transmitter antennas. A

descriptivespatial analysis of the BSs and the cases of death by neoplasia

identified inthe municipality was performed through an

ecological–epidemiological approach,using georeferencing. The database

employed in the survey was composed of threedata banks: 1. death by neoplasia

documented by the Health MunicipalDepartment; 2. BSs documented in ANATEL

(“Agência Nacional deTelecomunicaçõesâ€: ‘Telecommunications National

Agency’); and 3. census anddemographic city population data obtained from

official archives provided byIBGE (“Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e

Estatísticaâ€: ‘Brazilian Instituteof Geography and Statistics’). The

results show that approximately 856 BSs wereinstalled through December 2006.

Most (39.60%) of the BSs were located in the“Centro-Sulâ€

(‘Central-Southern’) region of the municipality. Between 1996 and2006, 7191

deaths by neoplasia occurred and within an area of 500 m from theBS, the

mortality rate was 34.76 per 10,000 inhabitants. Outside of this area, adecrease

in the number of deaths by neoplasia occurred. The greatestaccumulated incidence

was 5.83 per 1000 in the Central-Southern region and thelowest incidence was

2.05 per 1000 in the Barreiroregion. During the environmental monitoring, the

largest accumulated electricfield measured was 12.4 V/m and the smallest was 0.4

V/m. The largest densitypower was 40.78 ?W/cm2, and the smallest was 0.04

?W/cm2.

Conclusions

This research showed the existence of a spatial correlationbetween cases of

death by neoplasia and the locations of the BSs, in the Belo

Horizontemunicipality from 1996 to 2006. The mortality rates and the relative

risk werehigher for the residents inside a radius of 500 m from the BS, compared

to theaverage mortality rate of the entire city, and a decreased

dose–responsegradient was observed for residents who lived farther away from

the BS. Themajor antenna concentration was located in the Central-Southern SD of

the city,which also had the largest accumulated incidence.

Click here to view

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969711005754

 

 

Epidemiological Evidence for a Health Risk from Mobile Phone BaseStations. Int J

Occup Env Health:16- 3, JUL/SEP 2010, p 263-267.

Khurana V Hardell L Everaert J Bortkiewicz A Carlberg MAhonen M.

Click here for a PDF

http://www.brain-surgery.us/Khurana_et_al_IJOEH-Base_Station_RV.pdf

 

Vini Khurana (Australia,neurosurgeon)and Lennart Hardell (Sweden,oncologist)

have published a summary of ten studies that reported healtheffects of

populations living near cell towers. They found risks for cancer andneurological

disease in eight out of ten studies – within 500 meters of thecell antennas.

It is important to remember that not all cell tower antennas arethe same, and

the RF exposures around them can vary widely. Major macrocellsites can emit 6000

watts or more, and smaller sites can be less than 2000 watts.The distance

outward from a cell tower that creates the ‘zone of RF impact’needs to be

assessed on a site-specific basis.

 

Abstract

Human populations are increasingly exposed tomicrowave/radiofrequency (RF)

emissions from wireless communication technology,including mobile phones and

their base stations. By searching PubMed, weidentified a total of 10

epidemiological studies that assessed for putativehealth effects of mobile phone

base stations. Seven of these studies exploredthe association between base

station proximity and neurobehavioral effects andthree investigated cancer. We

found that eight of the 10 studies reportedincreased prevalence of adverse

neurobehavioral symptoms or cancer inpopulations living at distances & lt; 500

meters from base stations. None of thestudies reported exposure above accepted

international guidelines, suggestingthat current guidelines may be inadequate in

protecting the health of humanpopulations. We believe that comprehensive

epidemiological studies of longtermmobile phone base station exposure are

urgently required to more definitivelyunderstand its health impact.

 

 

Specific Health Symptoms and Cell Phone Radiation in Selbitz (Bavaria,

Germany)—Evidenceof a Dose-Response Relationship

In January 2009, 251 Bavarian residents were tested tobefore and after a cell

tower was erected in their town.  This study shows the changes that are

experiencedby the citizens.

Click here to read thestudy.

http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Radiation_Germany_2010s-copy.pd\

f

 

 

How does long term exposure to base stations and mobile phones affecthuman

hormone profiles?

This present study revealed that high RFR emitted fromeither mobile phone or

base station has tangible effects on pituitary–adrenalaxis represented in the

reduction of ACTH and consequently cortisol levels.Also, exposure to RFR is

associated with decrease in the release of thyroidhormones.

Click here to read thestudy

http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Hormones_cell_towers-copy.pdf

 

 

The Influence of Being Physically Near to a Cell Phone TransmissionMast on the

Incidence of Cancer

Summary

Following the call by Wolfram König, President of theBundesamt für

Strahlenschutz (Federal Agency for radiation protection), to alldoctors of

medicine to collaborate actively in the assessment of the risk posedby cellular

radiation, the aim of our study was to examine whether peopleliving close to

cellular transmitter antennas were exposed to a heightened riskof taking ill

with malignant tumors.

 

The basis of the data used for the survey were PC files ofthe case histories of

patients between the years 1994 and 2004. While adheringto data protection, the

personal data of almost 1,000 patients were evaluatedfor this study, which was

completed without any external financial support. Itis intended to continue the

project in the form of a register.

 

The result of the study shows that the proportion of newlydeveloping cancer

cases wassignificantly higher among those patients who had lived during the past

tenyears at a distance of up to 400 metres from the cellular transmitter

site,which has been in operation since 1993, compared to those patients

livingfurther away, and that the patients fell ill on average 8 years earlier.

 

In the years 1999-2004, ie after five years’ operation ofthe transmitting

installation, the relative risk of getting cancer had trebledfor the residents

of the area in the proximity of the installation compared tothe inhabitants of

Naila outside the area.

Click Here to readthis study.

http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Cell-towers-cancer-copy.pdf

 

 

Biological effects from exposure to electromagnetic radiation emittedby cell

tower base stations and other antenna arrays.  Blake Levitt and Henry Lai

This paper is published by the well respected NationalResearch Council of

Canada.  The authors of this document are world renownUSscientists and writers.

It’s a great over view of the problem that we all face.We just need to get

politicians to act on the research.

Click here to read thestudy

http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/A10-018

 

[Guest guest]

How about upgrading from Microsoft explorer 4? Shan? Take the time and do

us all a favour.

On Jul 23, 2012 9:40 PM, " Shan " <surpriseshan2@...> wrote:

> **

>

>

>

>

> Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Studies on Cell

> Antenna

>

>

http://mybronte.ca/wp/commercial-cell-tower-issue/studies-on-cell-phone-antenna/

>

>

>

> Professor Magda Havas has created a report for us that isspecific to our

> situation. The towers over the firehall have never hadcommercial towers

> placed on it because the International Association ofFire-fighters had not

> allowed it. Thischange is most unusual and goes against firehall policy.

> Please read relatedmaterials – Click Here.

> The Dangers of Cell Antenna in Residential Neighbourhoods

> http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Firefighter_sendout.pdf

>

>

> Since the IARC designated cell phone Base Stations (BS) as apossible cause

> of cancer, (click here to view video from the press conference Normal 0

> false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4E2i5XFX9M & feature=youtu.be )

> recentstudies have started to appear concerning the negative effects from

> living inclose proximity to the towers. Just likedamaging cell phone

> research was suppressed and took a long time to reach thepublic, ( Click

> here for a Canadian studyon cell phones

>

http://oem.bmj.com/content/68/9/631.full.pdf+html?sid=ca3ce25f-a8c2-446a-9395-98\

f6b13cfbae)

> the same is now happening with cell phone towers. Finally, governments

> areacting to warn their citizens. Here are a few of the most notable well

> researched studies that have become available.

>

>

>

> Mortality by neoplasia and cellular telephone base stations in the Belo

> Horizonte municipality, Minas Gerais state, Brazil

> Published Sept 2011.

> This well funded study was done by the Municipal Governmentof Belo

> Horizonte, Municipal Health Department, Belo Horizonte City, Minas Gerais

> State, Brazil. It showed that in personsthat live within 500 meters of a

> cell antenna base station (BS) there was amuch higher death rate from

> neoplasia which is the abnormal proliferation ofbenign or malignant cells

> which cause tumours.

>

> Abstract

> Pollution caused by the electromagnetic fields (EMFs) ofradio frequencies

> (RF) generated by the telecommunication system is one of thegreatest

> environmental problems of the twentieth century. The purpose of

> thisresearch was to verify the existence of a spatial correlation between

> basestation (BS) clusters and cases of deaths by neoplasia in the Belo

> Horizonte municipality, Minas Gerais state, Brazil, from1996 to 2006 and to

> measure the human exposure levels to EMF where there is amajor

> concentration of cellular telephone transmitter antennas. A

> descriptivespatial analysis of the BSs and the cases of death by neoplasia

> identified inthe municipality was performed through an

> ecological–epidemiological approach,using georeferencing. The database

> employed in the survey was composed of threedata banks: 1. death by

> neoplasia documented by the Health MunicipalDepartment; 2. BSs documented

> in ANATEL (“Agência Nacional deTelecomunicações”: ‘Telecommunications

> National Agency’); and 3. census anddemographic city population data

> obtained from official archives provided byIBGE (“Instituto Brasileiro de

> Geografia e Estatística”: ‘Brazilian Instituteof Geography and

> Statistics’). The results show that approximately 856 BSs wereinstalled

> through December 2006. Most (39.60%) of the BSs were located in

> the“Centro-Sul” (‘Central-Southern’) region of the municipality. Between

> 1996 and2006, 7191 deaths by neoplasia occurred and within an area of 500 m

> from theBS, the mortality rate was 34.76 per 10,000 inhabitants. Outside of

> this area, adecrease in the number of deaths by neoplasia occurred. The

> greatestaccumulated incidence was 5.83 per 1000 in the Central-Southern

> region and thelowest incidence was 2.05 per 1000 in the Barreiroregion.

> During the environmental monitoring, the largest accumulated electricfield

> measured was 12.4 V/m and the smallest was 0.4 V/m. The largest

> densitypower was 40.78 ?W/cm2, and the smallest was 0.04 ?W/cm2.

>

> Conclusions

> This research showed the existence of a spatial correlationbetween cases

> of death by neoplasia and the locations of the BSs, in the Belo

> Horizontemunicipality from 1996 to 2006. The mortality rates and the

> relative risk werehigher for the residents inside a radius of 500 m from

> the BS, compared to theaverage mortality rate of the entire city, and a

> decreased dose–responsegradient was observed for residents who lived

> farther away from the BS. Themajor antenna concentration was located in the

> Central-Southern SD of the city,which also had the largest accumulated

> incidence.

> Click here to view

> http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969711005754

>

>

>

> Epidemiological Evidence for a Health Risk from Mobile Phone BaseStations.

> Int J Occup Env Health:16- 3, JUL/SEP 2010, p 263-267.

> Khurana V Hardell L Everaert J Bortkiewicz A Carlberg MAhonen M.

> Click here for a PDF

> http://www.brain-surgery.us/Khurana_et_al_IJOEH-Base_Station_RV.pdf

>

> Vini Khurana (Australia,neurosurgeon)and Lennart Hardell

> (Sweden,oncologist) have published a summary of ten studies that reported

> healtheffects of populations living near cell towers. They found risks for

> cancer andneurological disease in eight out of ten studies – within 500

> meters of thecell antennas. It is important to remember that not all cell

> tower antennas arethe same, and the RF exposures around them can vary

> widely. Major macrocellsites can emit 6000 watts or more, and smaller sites

> can be less than 2000 watts.The distance outward from a cell tower that

> creates the ‘zone of RF impact’needs to be assessed on a site-specific

> basis.

>

> Abstract

> Human populations are increasingly exposed tomicrowave/radiofrequency (RF)

> emissions from wireless communication technology,including mobile phones

> and their base stations. By searching PubMed, weidentified a total of 10

> epidemiological studies that assessed for putativehealth effects of mobile

> phone base stations. Seven of these studies exploredthe association between

> base station proximity and neurobehavioral effects andthree investigated

> cancer. We found that eight of the 10 studies reportedincreased prevalence

> of adverse neurobehavioral symptoms or cancer inpopulations living at

> distances & lt; 500 meters from base stations. None of thestudies reported

> exposure above accepted international guidelines, suggestingthat current

> guidelines may be inadequate in protecting the health of humanpopulations.

> We believe that comprehensive epidemiological studies of longtermmobile

> phone base station exposure are urgently required to more

> definitivelyunderstand its health impact.

>

>

>

> Specific Health Symptoms and Cell Phone Radiation in Selbitz (Bavaria,

> Germany)—Evidenceof a Dose-Response Relationship

> In January 2009, 251 Bavarian residents were tested tobefore and after a

> cell tower was erected in their town. This study shows the changes that

> are experiencedby the citizens.

> Click here to read thestudy.

>

>

http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Radiation_Germany_2010s-copy.pd\

f

>

>

>

> How does long term exposure to base stations and mobile phones affecthuman

> hormone profiles?

> This present study revealed that high RFR emitted fromeither mobile phone

> or base station has tangible effects on pituitary–adrenalaxis represented

> in the reduction of ACTH and consequently cortisol levels.Also, exposure to

> RFR is associated with decrease in the release of thyroidhormones.

> Click here to read thestudy

>

> http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Hormones_cell_towers-copy.pdf

>

>

>

> The Influence of Being Physically Near to a Cell Phone TransmissionMast on

> the Incidence of Cancer

> Summary

> Following the call by Wolfram König, President of theBundesamt für

> Strahlenschutz (Federal Agency for radiation protection), to alldoctors of

> medicine to collaborate actively in the assessment of the risk posedby

> cellular radiation, the aim of our study was to examine whether

> peopleliving close to cellular transmitter antennas were exposed to a

> heightened riskof taking ill with malignant tumors.

>

> The basis of the data used for the survey were PC files ofthe case

> histories of patients between the years 1994 and 2004. While adheringto

> data protection, the personal data of almost 1,000 patients were

> evaluatedfor this study, which was completed without any external financial

> support. Itis intended to continue the project in the form of a register.

>

> The result of the study shows that the proportion of newlydeveloping

> cancer cases wassignificantly higher among those patients who had lived

> during the past tenyears at a distance of up to 400 metres from the

> cellular transmitter site,which has been in operation since 1993, compared

> to those patients livingfurther away, and that the patients fell ill on

> average 8 years earlier.

>

> In the years 1999-2004, ie after five years’ operation ofthe transmitting

> installation, the relative risk of getting cancer had trebledfor the

> residents of the area in the proximity of the installation compared tothe

> inhabitants of Naila outside the area.

> Click Here to readthis study.

>

> http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Cell-towers-cancer-copy.pdf

>

>

>

> Biological effects from exposure to electromagnetic radiation emittedby

> cell tower base stations and other antenna arrays. Blake Levitt and Henry

> Lai

> This paper is published by the well respected NationalResearch Council of

> Canada. The authors of this document are world renownUSscientists and

> writers. It’s a great over view of the problem that we all face.We just

> need to get politicians to act on the research.

> Click here to read thestudy

> http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/A10-018

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

I have Internet Explorer 9 on my computer.

I use a program called email stripper to clean the articles, and then I

copy the cleaned article onto an email --- sometimes I copy the article to a

Word document first and then copy the article to the email. I have no idea

where this stuff about Microsoft explorer 4 comes from. In any case I posted

this to 6 different groups and it got that stuff on it in 2 groups only. Part of

how an email comes out is due to how the group is set up...........I am

surprised that you don't realize that.

Shan

>

> > **

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Studies on Cell

> > Antenna

> >

> >

http://mybronte.ca/wp/commercial-cell-tower-issue/studies-on-cell-phone-antenna/

> >

> >

> >

> > Professor Magda Havas has created a report for us that isspecific to our

> > situation. The towers over the firehall have never hadcommercial towers

> > placed on it because the International Association ofFire-fighters had not

> > allowed it. Thischange is most unusual and goes against firehall policy.

> > Please read relatedmaterials – Click Here.

> > The Dangers of Cell Antenna in Residential Neighbourhoods

> > http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Firefighter_sendout.pdf

> >

> >

> > Since the IARC designated cell phone Base Stations (BS) as apossible cause

> > of cancer, (click here to view video from the press conference Normal 0

> > false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4E2i5XFX9M & feature=youtu.be )

> > recentstudies have started to appear concerning the negative effects from

> > living inclose proximity to the towers. Just likedamaging cell phone

> > research was suppressed and took a long time to reach thepublic, ( Click

> > here for a Canadian studyon cell phones

> >

http://oem.bmj.com/content/68/9/631.full.pdf+html?sid=ca3ce25f-a8c2-446a-9395-98\

f6b13cfbae)

> > the same is now happening with cell phone towers. Finally, governments

> > areacting to warn their citizens. Here are a few of the most notable well

> > researched studies that have become available.

> >

> >

> >

> > Mortality by neoplasia and cellular telephone base stations in the Belo

> > Horizonte municipality, Minas Gerais state, Brazil

> > Published Sept 2011.

> > This well funded study was done by the Municipal Governmentof Belo

> > Horizonte, Municipal Health Department, Belo Horizonte City, Minas Gerais

> > State, Brazil. It showed that in personsthat live within 500 meters of a

> > cell antenna base station (BS) there was amuch higher death rate from

> > neoplasia which is the abnormal proliferation ofbenign or malignant cells

> > which cause tumours.

> >

> > Abstract

> > Pollution caused by the electromagnetic fields (EMFs) ofradio frequencies

> > (RF) generated by the telecommunication system is one of thegreatest

> > environmental problems of the twentieth century. The purpose of

> > thisresearch was to verify the existence of a spatial correlation between

> > basestation (BS) clusters and cases of deaths by neoplasia in the Belo

> > Horizonte municipality, Minas Gerais state, Brazil, from1996 to 2006 and to

> > measure the human exposure levels to EMF where there is amajor

> > concentration of cellular telephone transmitter antennas. A

> > descriptivespatial analysis of the BSs and the cases of death by neoplasia

> > identified inthe municipality was performed through an

> > ecological–epidemiological approach,using georeferencing. The database

> > employed in the survey was composed of threedata banks: 1. death by

> > neoplasia documented by the Health MunicipalDepartment; 2. BSs documented

> > in ANATEL ( " Agência Nacional deTelecomunicações " : `Telecommunications

> > National Agency'); and 3. census anddemographic city population data

> > obtained from official archives provided byIBGE ( " Instituto Brasileiro de

> > Geografia e Estatística " : `Brazilian Instituteof Geography and

> > Statistics'). The results show that approximately 856 BSs wereinstalled

> > through December 2006. Most (39.60%) of the BSs were located in

> > the " Centro-Sul " (`Central-Southern') region of the municipality. Between

> > 1996 and2006, 7191 deaths by neoplasia occurred and within an area of 500 m

> > from theBS, the mortality rate was 34.76 per 10,000 inhabitants. Outside of

> > this area, adecrease in the number of deaths by neoplasia occurred. The

> > greatestaccumulated incidence was 5.83 per 1000 in the Central-Southern

> > region and thelowest incidence was 2.05 per 1000 in the Barreiroregion.

> > During the environmental monitoring, the largest accumulated electricfield

> > measured was 12.4 V/m and the smallest was 0.4 V/m. The largest

> > densitypower was 40.78 ?W/cm2, and the smallest was 0.04 ?W/cm2.

> >

> > Conclusions

> > This research showed the existence of a spatial correlationbetween cases

> > of death by neoplasia and the locations of the BSs, in the Belo

> > Horizontemunicipality from 1996 to 2006. The mortality rates and the

> > relative risk werehigher for the residents inside a radius of 500 m from

> > the BS, compared to theaverage mortality rate of the entire city, and a

> > decreased dose–responsegradient was observed for residents who lived

> > farther away from the BS. Themajor antenna concentration was located in the

> > Central-Southern SD of the city,which also had the largest accumulated

> > incidence.

> > Click here to view

> > http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969711005754

> >

> >

> >

> > Epidemiological Evidence for a Health Risk from Mobile Phone BaseStations.

> > Int J Occup Env Health:16- 3, JUL/SEP 2010, p 263-267.

> > Khurana V Hardell L Everaert J Bortkiewicz A Carlberg MAhonen M.

> > Click here for a PDF

> > http://www.brain-surgery.us/Khurana_et_al_IJOEH-Base_Station_RV.pdf

> >

> > Vini Khurana (Australia,neurosurgeon)and Lennart Hardell

> > (Sweden,oncologist) have published a summary of ten studies that reported

> > healtheffects of populations living near cell towers. They found risks for

> > cancer andneurological disease in eight out of ten studies – within 500

> > meters of thecell antennas. It is important to remember that not all cell

> > tower antennas arethe same, and the RF exposures around them can vary

> > widely. Major macrocellsites can emit 6000 watts or more, and smaller sites

> > can be less than 2000 watts.The distance outward from a cell tower that

> > creates the `zone of RF impact'needs to be assessed on a site-specific

> > basis.

> >

> > Abstract

> > Human populations are increasingly exposed tomicrowave/radiofrequency (RF)

> > emissions from wireless communication technology,including mobile phones

> > and their base stations. By searching PubMed, weidentified a total of 10

> > epidemiological studies that assessed for putativehealth effects of mobile

> > phone base stations. Seven of these studies exploredthe association between

> > base station proximity and neurobehavioral effects andthree investigated

> > cancer. We found that eight of the 10 studies reportedincreased prevalence

> > of adverse neurobehavioral symptoms or cancer inpopulations living at

> > distances & lt; 500 meters from base stations. None of thestudies reported

> > exposure above accepted international guidelines, suggestingthat current

> > guidelines may be inadequate in protecting the health of humanpopulations.

> > We believe that comprehensive epidemiological studies of longtermmobile

> > phone base station exposure are urgently required to more

> > definitivelyunderstand its health impact.

> >

> >

> >

> > Specific Health Symptoms and Cell Phone Radiation in Selbitz (Bavaria,

> > Germany)—Evidenceof a Dose-Response Relationship

> > In January 2009, 251 Bavarian residents were tested tobefore and after a

> > cell tower was erected in their town. This study shows the changes that

> > are experiencedby the citizens.

> > Click here to read thestudy.

> >

> >

http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Radiation_Germany_2010s-copy.pd\

f

> >

> >

> >

> > How does long term exposure to base stations and mobile phones affecthuman

> > hormone profiles?

> > This present study revealed that high RFR emitted fromeither mobile phone

> > or base station has tangible effects on pituitary–adrenalaxis represented

> > in the reduction of ACTH and consequently cortisol levels.Also, exposure to

> > RFR is associated with decrease in the release of thyroidhormones.

> > Click here to read thestudy

> >

> >

http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Hormones_cell_towers-copy.pdf

> >

> >

> >

> > The Influence of Being Physically Near to a Cell Phone TransmissionMast on

> > the Incidence of Cancer

> > Summary

> > Following the call by Wolfram König, President of theBundesamt für

> > Strahlenschutz (Federal Agency for radiation protection), to alldoctors of

> > medicine to collaborate actively in the assessment of the risk posedby

> > cellular radiation, the aim of our study was to examine whether

> > peopleliving close to cellular transmitter antennas were exposed to a

> > heightened riskof taking ill with malignant tumors.

> >

> > The basis of the data used for the survey were PC files ofthe case

> > histories of patients between the years 1994 and 2004. While adheringto

> > data protection, the personal data of almost 1,000 patients were

> > evaluatedfor this study, which was completed without any external financial

> > support. Itis intended to continue the project in the form of a register.

> >

> > The result of the study shows that the proportion of newlydeveloping

> > cancer cases wassignificantly higher among those patients who had lived

> > during the past tenyears at a distance of up to 400 metres from the

> > cellular transmitter site,which has been in operation since 1993, compared

> > to those patients livingfurther away, and that the patients fell ill on

> > average 8 years earlier.

> >

> > In the years 1999-2004, ie after five years' operation ofthe transmitting

> > installation, the relative risk of getting cancer had trebledfor the

> > residents of the area in the proximity of the installation compared tothe

> > inhabitants of Naila outside the area.

> > Click Here to readthis study.

> >

> > http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Cell-towers-cancer-copy.pdf

> >

> >

> >

> > Biological effects from exposure to electromagnetic radiation emittedby

> > cell tower base stations and other antenna arrays. Blake Levitt and Henry

> > Lai

> > This paper is published by the well respected NationalResearch Council of

> > Canada. The authors of this document are world renownUSscientists and

> > writers. It's a great over view of the problem that we all face.We just

> > need to get politicians to act on the research.

> > Click here to read thestudy

> > http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/A10-018

> >

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

Do you always have this difficulty with comprehension? Well that certainly

explains a lot.

I did not say anything about notebook etc ......

> > >

> > > > **

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Studies on Cell

> > > > Antenna

> > > >

> > > >

> >

http://mybronte.ca/wp/commercial-cell-tower-issue/studies-on-cell-phone-antenna/

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Professor Magda Havas has created a report for us that isspecific to

> > our

> > > > situation. The towers over the firehall have never hadcommercial towers

> > > > placed on it because the International Association ofFire-fighters had

> > not

> > > > allowed it. Thischange is most unusual and goes against firehall

> > policy.

> > > > Please read relatedmaterials – Click Here.

> > > > The Dangers of Cell Antenna in Residential Neighbourhoods

> > > >

> > http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Firefighter_sendout.pdf

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Since the IARC designated cell phone Base Stations (BS) as apossible

> > cause

> > > > of cancer, (click here to view video from the press conference Normal 0

> > > > false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

> > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4E2i5XFX9M & feature=youtu.be )

> > > > recentstudies have started to appear concerning the negative effects

> > from

> > > > living inclose proximity to the towers. Just likedamaging cell phone

> > > > research was suppressed and took a long time to reach thepublic, (

> > Click

> > > > here for a Canadian studyon cell phones

> > > >

> >

http://oem.bmj.com/content/68/9/631.full.pdf+html?sid=ca3ce25f-a8c2-446a-9395-98\

f6b13cfbae

> > )

> > > > the same is now happening with cell phone towers. Finally, governments

> > > > areacting to warn their citizens. Here are a few of the most notable

> > well

> > > > researched studies that have become available.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Mortality by neoplasia and cellular telephone base stations in the Belo

> > > > Horizonte municipality, Minas Gerais state, Brazil

> > > > Published Sept 2011.

> > > > This well funded study was done by the Municipal Governmentof Belo

> > > > Horizonte, Municipal Health Department, Belo Horizonte City, Minas

> > Gerais

> > > > State, Brazil. It showed that in personsthat live within 500 meters of

> > a

> > > > cell antenna base station (BS) there was amuch higher death rate from

> > > > neoplasia which is the abnormal proliferation ofbenign or malignant

> > cells

> > > > which cause tumours.

> > > >

> > > > Abstract

> > > > Pollution caused by the electromagnetic fields (EMFs) ofradio

> > frequencies

> > > > (RF) generated by the telecommunication system is one of thegreatest

> > > > environmental problems of the twentieth century. The purpose of

> > > > thisresearch was to verify the existence of a spatial correlation

> > between

> > > > basestation (BS) clusters and cases of deaths by neoplasia in the Belo

> > > > Horizonte municipality, Minas Gerais state, Brazil, from1996 to 2006

> > and to

> > > > measure the human exposure levels to EMF where there is amajor

> > > > concentration of cellular telephone transmitter antennas. A

> > > > descriptivespatial analysis of the BSs and the cases of death by

> > neoplasia

> > > > identified inthe municipality was performed through an

> > > > ecological–epidemiological approach,using georeferencing. The database

> > > > employed in the survey was composed of threedata banks: 1. death by

> > > > neoplasia documented by the Health MunicipalDepartment; 2. BSs

> > documented

> > > > in ANATEL ( " Agência Nacional deTelecomunicações " : `Telecommunications

> > > > National Agency'); and 3. census anddemographic city population data

> > > > obtained from official archives provided byIBGE ( " Instituto Brasileiro

> > de

> > > > Geografia e Estatística " : `Brazilian Instituteof Geography and

> > > > Statistics'). The results show that approximately 856 BSs wereinstalled

> > > > through December 2006. Most (39.60%) of the BSs were located in

> > > > the " Centro-Sul " (`Central-Southern') region of the municipality.

> > Between

> > > > 1996 and2006, 7191 deaths by neoplasia occurred and within an area of

> > 500 m

> > > > from theBS, the mortality rate was 34.76 per 10,000 inhabitants.

> > Outside of

> > > > this area, adecrease in the number of deaths by neoplasia occurred. The

> > > > greatestaccumulated incidence was 5.83 per 1000 in the Central-Southern

> > > > region and thelowest incidence was 2.05 per 1000 in the Barreiroregion.

> > > > During the environmental monitoring, the largest accumulated

> > electricfield

> > > > measured was 12.4 V/m and the smallest was 0.4 V/m. The largest

> > > > densitypower was 40.78 ?W/cm2, and the smallest was 0.04 ?W/cm2.

> > > >

> > > > Conclusions

> > > > This research showed the existence of a spatial correlationbetween

> > cases

> > > > of death by neoplasia and the locations of the BSs, in the Belo

> > > > Horizontemunicipality from 1996 to 2006. The mortality rates and the

> > > > relative risk werehigher for the residents inside a radius of 500 m

> > from

> > > > the BS, compared to theaverage mortality rate of the entire city, and a

> > > > decreased dose–responsegradient was observed for residents who lived

> > > > farther away from the BS. Themajor antenna concentration was located

> > in the

> > > > Central-Southern SD of the city,which also had the largest accumulated

> > > > incidence.

> > > > Click here to view

> > > > http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969711005754

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Epidemiological Evidence for a Health Risk from Mobile Phone

> > BaseStations.

> > > > Int J Occup Env Health:16- 3, JUL/SEP 2010, p 263-267.

> > > > Khurana V Hardell L Everaert J Bortkiewicz A Carlberg MAhonen M.

> > > > Click here for a PDF

> > > > http://www.brain-surgery.us/Khurana_et_al_IJOEH-Base_Station_RV.pdf

> > > >

> > > > Vini Khurana (Australia,neurosurgeon)and Lennart Hardell

> > > > (Sweden,oncologist) have published a summary of ten studies that

> > reported

> > > > healtheffects of populations living near cell towers. They found risks

> > for

> > > > cancer andneurological disease in eight out of ten studies – within 500

> > > > meters of thecell antennas. It is important to remember that not all

> > cell

> > > > tower antennas arethe same, and the RF exposures around them can vary

> > > > widely. Major macrocellsites can emit 6000 watts or more, and smaller

> > sites

> > > > can be less than 2000 watts.The distance outward from a cell tower that

> > > > creates the `zone of RF impact'needs to be assessed on a site-specific

> > > > basis.

> > > >

> > > > Abstract

> > > > Human populations are increasingly exposed tomicrowave/radiofrequency

> > (RF)

> > > > emissions from wireless communication technology,including mobile

> > phones

> > > > and their base stations. By searching PubMed, weidentified a total of

> > 10

> > > > epidemiological studies that assessed for putativehealth effects of

> > mobile

> > > > phone base stations. Seven of these studies exploredthe association

> > between

> > > > base station proximity and neurobehavioral effects andthree

> > investigated

> > > > cancer. We found that eight of the 10 studies reportedincreased

> > prevalence

> > > > of adverse neurobehavioral symptoms or cancer inpopulations living at

> > > > distances & lt; 500 meters from base stations. None of thestudies

> > reported

> > > > exposure above accepted international guidelines, suggestingthat

> > current

> > > > guidelines may be inadequate in protecting the health of

> > humanpopulations.

> > > > We believe that comprehensive epidemiological studies of longtermmobile

> > > > phone base station exposure are urgently required to more

> > > > definitivelyunderstand its health impact.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Specific Health Symptoms and Cell Phone Radiation in Selbitz (Bavaria,

> > > > Germany)—Evidenceof a Dose-Response Relationship

> > > > In January 2009, 251 Bavarian residents were tested tobefore and after

> > a

> > > > cell tower was erected in their town. This study shows the changes that

> > > > are experiencedby the citizens.

> > > > Click here to read thestudy.

> > > >

> > > >

> >

http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Radiation_Germany_2010s-copy.pd\

f

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > How does long term exposure to base stations and mobile phones

> > affecthuman

> > > > hormone profiles?

> > > > This present study revealed that high RFR emitted fromeither mobile

> > phone

> > > > or base station has tangible effects on pituitary–adrenalaxis

> > represented

> > > > in the reduction of ACTH and consequently cortisol levels.Also,

> > exposure to

> > > > RFR is associated with decrease in the release of thyroidhormones.

> > > > Click here to read thestudy

> > > >

> > > >

> >

http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Hormones_cell_towers-copy.pdf

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > The Influence of Being Physically Near to a Cell Phone

> > TransmissionMast on

> > > > the Incidence of Cancer

> > > > Summary

> > > > Following the call by Wolfram König, President of theBundesamt für

> > > > Strahlenschutz (Federal Agency for radiation protection), to

> > alldoctors of

> > > > medicine to collaborate actively in the assessment of the risk posedby

> > > > cellular radiation, the aim of our study was to examine whether

> > > > peopleliving close to cellular transmitter antennas were exposed to a

> > > > heightened riskof taking ill with malignant tumors.

> > > >

> > > > The basis of the data used for the survey were PC files ofthe case

> > > > histories of patients between the years 1994 and 2004. While adheringto

> > > > data protection, the personal data of almost 1,000 patients were

> > > > evaluatedfor this study, which was completed without any external

> > financial

> > > > support. Itis intended to continue the project in the form of a

> > register.

> > > >

> > > > The result of the study shows that the proportion of newlydeveloping

> > > > cancer cases wassignificantly higher among those patients who had lived

> > > > during the past tenyears at a distance of up to 400 metres from the

> > > > cellular transmitter site,which has been in operation since 1993,

> > compared

> > > > to those patients livingfurther away, and that the patients fell ill on

> > > > average 8 years earlier.

> > > >

> > > > In the years 1999-2004, ie after five years' operation ofthe

> > transmitting

> > > > installation, the relative risk of getting cancer had trebledfor the

> > > > residents of the area in the proximity of the installation compared

> > tothe

> > > > inhabitants of Naila outside the area.

> > > > Click Here to readthis study.

> > > >

> > > >

> > http://mybronte.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Cell-towers-cancer-copy.pdf

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Biological effects from exposure to electromagnetic radiation emittedby

> > > > cell tower base stations and other antenna arrays. Blake Levitt and

> > Henry

> > > > Lai

> > > > This paper is published by the well respected NationalResearch Council

> > of

> > > > Canada. The authors of this document are world renownUSscientists and

> > > > writers. It's a great over view of the problem that we all face.We just

> > > > need to get politicians to act on the research.

> > > > Click here to read thestudy

> > > > http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/A10-018

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >