BPA-Free Products Still Contain Toxins

[Guest guest]

BPA-Free Products Still Contain Bisphenols of Equal Toxicity

June 20 2012

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/06/20/bpa-free-plastic-s\

till-toxic.aspx?e_cid=20120620_DNL_art_2

By Dr. Mercola

Just when you thought you'd learned everything there was to learn about

how to avoid bisphenol-A (BPA), the endocrine-disrupting plastics chemical,

new research shows that there's more hormone-disrupting bisphenols around

you than you probably thought.

In answer to consumers' demands to drop BPA from products, many

manufacturers have simply switched to using a different-but equally toxic

and perhaps even more toxic-chemical called bisphenol-S (BPS).

It May be BPA-Free, But What About BPS?

BPA, an estrogenic plastic by-product used in the manufacture of

polycarbonate plastics, can leach into food or drinks from the plastic

containers holding them. BPA has been identified as an estrogen-mimicking

compound since the 1930s, and is known to be particularly dangerous for

pregnant women, infants and children. In fact, in the early 1930s BPA was

used as an artificial estrogen to not only fatten poultry and cattle, but as

a form of estrogen replacement therapy for women of the times. It was only

in the 1940s that Bayer and General Electric used BPA to harden

polycarbonate plastics and make epoxy resin.

It has since become one of the world's highest production volume chemicals

and has been widely reported in the media as being a suspected disruptor of

your body's hormones.

Canada, in September 2010, declared BPA as a toxic substance, but to date

no other country has followed suit, although BPA has been banned in baby

bottles in Europe and the US. As a result of the widespread consumer

backlash, however, many companies have rolled out " BPA-free " plastic

products, ranging from bottles and sippy cups to reusable water bottles,

meant to appeal to those health-conscious consumers looking to avoid toxins.

Unfortunately, this may be just a ruse, as studies now show another

bisphenol, bisphenol-S (BPS), is now showing up in human urine

concentrations at levels similar to those of BPA.i This suggests that many

manufacturers are simply swapping one bisphenol for another.

BPS May be Less Known, But That Doesn't Make it Less Toxic

Similar to the way food manufacturers label a bag of gummy bears as

" fat-free, " implying it's good for you while staying silent about the

massive amounts of sugar they contain, plastics manufacturers can legally

make it appear their products are safe by labeling them BPA-free, even

though they may contain BPS, or another similar toxic chemical, that they

don't mention. More corporate lies of omission that can and do hurt your

health.

In the case of BPS, there's reason to believe it is just as dangerous to

human health, and possibly more so, than BPA, although the research is not

nearly as abundant just yet. Writing in the journal Toxicology In Vitro,

researchers stated:ii

" In 2011, the European Commission has restricted the use of Bisphenol A

in plastic infant feeding bottles. In a response to this restriction,

Bisphenol S is now often used as a component of plastic substitutes for the

production of babybottles. One of the major concerns leading to the

restriction of Bisphenol A was its weak estrogenic activity. By using two

highly standardised transactivation assays, we could demonstrate that the

estrogenic activity of Bisphenol A and Bisphenol S is of a comparable

potency. "

Not only does BPS appear to have similar hormone-mimicking characteristics

to BPA, but research suggests it is actually significantly less

biodegradable, and more heat-stable and photo-resistant, than BPA.

GreenMedInfo reports:

" ... while regulators wait for manufacturers who promote their products

with " BPA-Free! " stickers at the same moment that they infuse them with BPS

to voluntarily reformulate,there isevidence now that BPS may actually have

worse effects to environmental and human health, alike..

" ... BPS' relative inability to biodegrade indicates: 1) once it is

absorbed into the human body, it may accumulate there for longer periods of

time. 2) it is more likely to persist in the environment, making external

exposures to it, and its many metabolites, much more likely than the faster

degrading BPA. In other words, its potential to do harm will worsen along

the axis of time, not lessen, which is a common argument made for the

purported " safety " of BPA. "

Just How Many Chemicals are Lurking in Your BPA-Free Plastic?

You would think labeling a product " BPA-Free " would be some measure of

protection against ingesting toxic plastic by-products, but it turns out

that tests on plastics using this label have not been conducted under

real-world conditions like running the plastics through a dishwasher or

heating them in a microwave.

In a study meant to simulate " real-world " use, 95 percent of all plastic

products tested positive for estrogenic activity, meaning they can still

disrupt your hormones even if they carry a BPA-free label. Even more

disconcerting is the finding that BPA-free plastics in some cases leached

more BPA than the non-BPA free plastics.iii

In some cases, instead of actually removing BPA from their products,

manufacturers are only taking out a percentage of it, which means we're

still being exposed to it, only now in undisclosed amounts. The truth is

there's an alphabet soup of toxic chemicals in almost everything you come in

contact with, from plastics to PVC water lines to canned goods, which are

lined with BPA-containing plastic. Thermal receipt paper, all world paper

currency and those sealants your dentists want to put on your and your

children's teeth also are primary sources of BPA exposure.

But again, BPA is not the only culprit; it's simply the most highly

publicized one. There's also Bisphenol AB and AF, Bisphenol B and BP,

Bisphenol C, Bisphenol E, F, G, M, S, P, PH, TMC and, yes, there's even a

Bisphenol Z. Any one of these can be in your BPA-free baby bottle or sippy

cup, unfortunately.

Who's Minding the " BPA-Free " Store?

Now that BPA-free products are beginning to flood the market, you may be

interested to know that we actually know relatively little about what's

really in these new plastics, and what little we do know comes right from

the manufacturers. The Atlantic reported:iv

" ... because the U.S. system of regulating chemicals relies primarily

on information supplied by a material's manufacturer, we know relatively

little about these new plastics.

" ... Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), the U.S. law that

regulates chemicals in commerce, it's entirely permissible to launch a new

material into high-volume production without disclosing its precise chemical

identity or any information about its toxicity. This makes it impossible for

the public to assess product safety independently of manufacturer claims.

And currently, despite EPA and FDA policies that support " safe " alternatives

to a chemical of concern like BPA, neither federal agency conducts safety

testing of new materials destined for consumer products before they come on

the market. "

So it's very much an anything goes attitude when it comes to the chemicals

used in countless consumer products. Until the system changes - if the

system changes - your safest bet is to avoid plastic products as much as

possible.

Glass is One of the Best Alternatives

If you're interested in avoiding any number of chemical toxins leaching

into your food and beverages, choose glass over plastic, especially when it

comes to products that will come into contact with food or beverages, or

those intended for pregnant women, infants and children. This applies to

canned goods as well, which are a major source of BPA (and possibly other

chemicals) exposure, so whenever you can, choose jarred goods over canned

goods, or opt for fresh instead. Another good idea is to ditch plastic

teething toys for your little ones and choose natural wood or fabric

varieties instead.

To be fair, you probably can no longer completely eliminate your exposure

to BPA, BPS and similar toxins (since they're likely in our air, water, and

food, too) but you can certainly reduce your exposure dramatically by making

informed choices like those described above.

References:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

a.. i Environmental Science & Technology June 7, 2012

b.. ii Toxicol In Vitro. 2012 Aug;26(5):727-31

c.. iii Environmental Health Perspectives March 2, 2011 (Epub Ahead of

Print)

d.. iv The Atlantic April 13, 2011