A Weapon??? Electromagnetic ~ Radio Frequency Technology

[Guest guest]

According to this CNN special report, this radio frequency is dangerous

and this has been known since at least 1985....................in my

perspective, this then begs the question " why are smart meters being attached

to

our homes? "

blessings

Shan

CNN Special Report 1985 ~ Electromagnetic ~ Radio Frequency Technology

Dr. Becker is interviewed.

_

& feature=youtu.be & t=9m18s_

(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZRaOvuVCLY & feature=youtu.be & t=9m18s)

Soon after the secret meeting of 1952 in New Mexico between US and USSR

scientists, Russia started to use pulsed microwaves against the US embassy in

Moscow. The US government discovered this attack in about 1962 but did

not tell the public until 1976 and the Russians closed the transmitter in

1978-79.26 Two US ambassadors died from cancer and a third developed a

leukaemia-type disease. The exposure level was said to be below the US safety

limits, meaning that the US had few grounds for either legal or moral redress.

In the early 1980s the US air force in turn used pulsed microwaves against

protestors at Greenham Common at non-thermal levels.27 The UK government

is said to have used similar microwave weapons in Northern Ireland during

the troubles.

FROM PAGE 5 -

_http://www.weepinitiative.org/LINKEDDOCS/scientific/20080117_bevington_emfs

..pdf_

(http://www.weepinitiative.org/LINKEDDOCS/scientific/20080117_bevington_emfs.pdf\

)

_http://www.es-uk.info/docs/20080117_bevington_emfs.pdf_

(http://www.es-uk.info/docs/20080117_bevington_emfs.pdf)

Attitudes to the health dangers of non-thermal EMFs

A review of the polarisation in attitudes towards research into the health

dangers of non-thermal electromagnetic fields (EMFs).

Conclusion

(a) Long-term dangers to the human race

The dangers of non-thermal EMFs to human health are said to be a greater

threat to the future of the human race than global warming. Yet the last 60

years have seen the longest refusal in the history of science to accept

increasingly clear scientific evidence, on the part of a relatively small

number of regulators, governments and scientists. Becker, a life-long

research scientist into non-thermal EMF effects on the human body, twice

nominated for a Nobel prize, and a pioneer of using non-thermal EMFs to

regenerate human tissue, wrote about the future of the human race as follows.

‘

There is a strong possibility that increasing electropollution could set in

motion irreversible changes leading to our extinction before we are even

aware of them.’ With regard to the need for regulators and governments to

react

urgently to the dangers of non-thermal EMFs, he stated that: ‘Our survival

depends on the ability of upright scientists and other people of goodwill

to break the military-industrial death grip on our policy-making

institutions.’173

( Ill-health and early death among the general population

It is immoral and irresponsible for any society to follow a few regulators

and scientists who adopt an attitude to the evidence of adverse health

effects of non-thermal EMFs which ignores the dangers revealed by research.

The result is that the general population is then exposed against its will to

non-thermal EMFs which have been shown to trigger many illnesses reducing

the quality and the length of life.

© Suffering for people sensitised to non-thermal EMFs

To foster ignorance or deliberately to obscure the valid research already

done into the health dangers of non-thermal EMFs is immoral in the effects

it has on those people who become sensitised to non-thermal EMFs. They are

then unable to receive the medical help and the protection from non-thermal

EMFs which they deserve from the rest of society which has caused their

suffering.

_http://www.weepinitiative.org/LINKEDDOCS/scientific/20080117_bevington_emfs

..pdf_

(http://www.weepinitiative.org/LINKEDDOCS/scientific/20080117_bevington_emfs.pdf\

)

_http://www.es-uk.info/docs/20080117_bevington_emfs.pdf_

(http://www.es-uk.info/docs/20080117_bevington_emfs.pdf)

EVIDENCE of HARM: Experts on Wireless Bio-Effects

includes many VIDEOS + several links

_http://eon3emfblog.net/?p=2539_ (http://eon3emfblog.net/?p=2539)

The BioInitiative Report - Biological Standards for Wireless

VIDEO. Sage, environmental consultant, talks about The BioInitiative

Report: A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard for

Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF), which she edited with a team of

international scientists. They document serious scientific concerns about

current

limits regulating how much EMF is allowable from power lines, cell phones,

and many other sources of EMF exposure in daily life. The report concludes

the existing standards for public safety are inadequate to protect public

health.

_http://www.stayonthetruth.com/the-bioinitiative-report.php_

(http://www.stayonthetruth.com/the-bioinitiative-report.php)

The Biological Effects of Weak Electromagnetic Fields

Goldsworthy 2007. CONTENTS -- Abstract; Introduction; A few basic

facts; Weak electromagnetic fields release calcium from cell membranes; The

loss of calcium makes cell membranes leak; Membrane leakage damages DNA;

DNA damage may cause cancer; DNA damage reduces fertility; There may also be

permanent genetic damage; Effects on metabolism; How calcium controls

metabolism; Calcium leakage and brain function; Electrosensitivity and

hypocalcemia – a possible cure; Electromagnetic exposure and motor accidents;

The

theory behind it all; The role of eddy currents; How calcium is released;

Why there are amplitude windows; Why low frequencies and pulses work better;

Frequency windows; Amplitude modulated and pulsed radio waves also work; How

calcium loss makes holes in membranes; Defence mechanisms; Conclusion;

Box- Ion Cyclotron Resonance;Footnote; References

The evidence that Electromagnetic fields can have “non-thermalâ€

biological effects is now overwhelming. In this article, I will explain how

these

effects arise. I have included key references that should enable the more

inquisitive reader to delve deeper. Often are found contradictory assertions

and that the reproducibility of several experiments is only mediocre. As we

will see, this is almost certainly because of differences in the genetic

and physiological condition of the biological material and its ability to

defend itself against electromagnetic insults.

_http://weeksmd.com/2008/05/the-biological-effects-of-weak-electromagnetic-f

ields/_

(http://weeksmd.com/2008/05/the-biological-effects-of-weak-electromagnetic-field\

s/)