Guest guest Posted July 13, 2001 Report Share Posted July 13, 2001 Dr. Siff or Coach Goss: Do either of you have anything to add to this subject? Riley King Ogden, UT > Coach Goss or anybody else: > > I remember a about a year ago Coach Poliquin or Dr. Serrano wrote in > an article for either Peakhealth or T-mag that he tested his clients > using a 12-sites on their bodies. I have a couple of rather > unsophisticated calipers that I use on my clients to give rough > measurements of progress in mms as opposed to percentages of > blubber. I usually use a 3-site method (scapula, stomach, and quad) > and add them up to show total fat for those sites in mms. After a > period of time, I test again to show them (hopefully) a quantitative > measure of their progress. I believe that there would be an > advantage to include more sites, in order to more fully cover > individual differences attributed to race, sex, and body type. > > Does anyone believe that computing bodyfat % though one of the many > different equations, is superior to the method that I described > above? I realize that my method is rather simplistic, but it has > usually been a tremendous confidence builder in my clients. I have > noticed occationally that, while there was not a noticable change in > bodyfat %, there was a drop in total mms, which will shows progress > to the client. If anyone believes that the % calculation is the way > to go, what is the best equation to use for athletes? > > Coach Goss: I know that you have many interactions with both men, do > you know what sites are measured? Additionally, what are your > thoughts on this subject? > > Thanks, > Riley King > Ogden, UT USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.