Guest guest Posted September 24, 2001 Report Share Posted September 24, 2001 Re: Weights Dangerous for Baseball? Specificity Nyman wrote: To Casler, There are a number of items in your last post that I do not agree with but I only have time energy and desire to address one of your " rebuttals " . As I do enough arguing with others about pitching each day. *** Casler responds: " Argument By Laziness " The arguer attempts to make the issues raised by the questioner seem trivial and unimportant by feigning more important issues take all " time energy and desire " . This is an attempt to devalue the question or argument and elevate the status of the responder. Usually the matter responded to is carefully selected as the weakest issue of the questioner and a " shoe in, or slam dunk " for the responder. (I promise I won't continue this, but I couldn't resist) Nyman wrote: 3. Pitching is NOT a unilateral activity. Some of the best and hardest throwing exhibit almost perfect bilateral symmetry for most of the delivery. Casler wrote: This use of the term " bilateral " is news to me. I am under the impression that a " bilateral " action requires that both limbs simultaneously provide equal force, in the same movement pattern, using the same muscle groups such as a standing dumbbell press where the bells are both pressed at the same time. Are you referring to the simultaneous tensioning of the scapulas? as opposed to the actual action of the pitching arm? You certainly don't horizontally adduct both arms during the actual throwing motion (preparation excluded) " Nyman wrote: , the bilateral symmetry that I refer to not only has to do with balance, potentiation and force production issues but also the motor program and its " overhead " . Casler writes: Pitching no doubt involves the whole body. It would seem however that much of the activity is performed on one leg at a time, AND the ball is certainly delivered with one hand. (Isn't tennis considered uni-lateral?) I plead ignorance if this is generally considered " bilateral " . That certainly would give one a very limited range of activities that could be termed " uni-lateral " . Never the less, my point regarding the bench press was that it IS a classic " bi-lateral " action with equal motor impulse patterns eccentric and concentric, not opposing/antagonist systems activated in concert. So it (the bench press) has a tendency to develop a motor activation of both limbs acting to perform the same task on each side. This is certainly not a " red flag " since this motor pattern is not generally thought as " reflexive " for general purposes. This also does not lessen its value as a Gross Conditioner, but does not increase its value toward the " perfect pitching exercise " (remember my original post was not anti-bench press, but questioning the perfect moniker?) Casler wrote: " You certainly don't horizontally adduct both arms during the actual throwing motion (preparation excluded) " Nyman wrote: You most certainly do horizontally flex both scapula during the throwing motion. The horizontal adduction of both scapula is an important preparatory move, the same eccentric-concentric action typical of most ballistic actions. That's why the bench press is so " intriguing " for pitchers. because it involves similar eccentric-concentric actions/ROM. Casler writes: I can't seem to see where I said anything about not adducting the scapula. (I assume you are referring to what is usually called depressing and downward rotation of the scapula?) I said, " You certainly don't horizontally adduct both ARMS during the actual throwing motion (preparation excluded) " Nyman wrote: And I don't know why " preparation is excluded " . The preparation eccentric phase is vital to maximizing the power production and transfer as it is with almost all ballistic activities. Casler writes: I excluded the " preparation " because there is some simultaneous horizontal humerus adduction prior to the pre-stretch that I wanted to eliminate since it is only the starting position. (When the pitcher holds the ball and glove out in front of them) It is after this position, that both arms are ABducted in a somewhat simultaneous action similar to the eccentric phase of the bench press. This is the position that is most similar to any action in the bench press. It should be noted however that the lead arm is accelerated to provide a pre-stretch by the muscles that are antagonist to the bench press. This acceleration, combined with the with the accompanying stabilization of the scapular/shoulder complex produces a coupling to the dynamic torso activation and provides a platform from which the opposite side of the body can produce maximal force. Nyman wrote: By the way , the name is NYMAN. Sorry! (I use copy and paste and must have misspelled the first copy) Regards, A. Casler TRI-VECTOR 3-D Force Training Systems Century City, CA http://sites.netscape.net/summitfitnessco/homepage http://summitfitness.websitegalaxy.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.