Guest guest Posted March 1, 2002 Report Share Posted March 1, 2002 Often, people refer to some of us who really enjoy our work as " workaholics " , a term which implies some sort of addiction or compulsion which we cannot control. I prefer to think of myself as a " workaphiliac " , that is, someone who loves to work. Since I also enjoy playing just as much (in various forms such as sport and recreation), I might also be called a " ludophiliac " (one who loves game playing). So, let any of us who have a great passion for doing anything, let us add the far more positive suffix " -philiac " , rather than " -aholic " , with all of its negative connotations -- like " Supertrainerphiliac " , even though, judging from feedback from list members, I know that many of you out there admit to being " Supertrainerholics " -- suffering from withdrawal symptoms if you have to leave the Internet for a few days for business, vacation or competitions! Dr Mel C Siff Denver, USA Supertraining/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2002 Report Share Posted March 2, 2002 Mel Siff wrote: <Often, people refer to some of us who really enjoy our work as " workaholics " , a term which implies some sort of addiction or compulsion which we cannot control. I prefer to think of myself as a " workaphiliac " , that is, someone who loves to work.....> ** I wonder if there is a balance between " oholic " and " aphiliac " as it is not so wrong to feel a sense of loss when something trivial keeps you from a workout or you miss the fun of being on line. As long as it is not crippling, it appears quite healthy. If you have mapped out your workout, packed your gym bag and the cable goes out of order and you have to wait the prescribed 4 hours for the cable man to come, and you miss your workout because your spouse has PTA and the kids have some incredibly important meeting at school that is going to change the direction of the world peace process, you have a right to be annoyed and feel a sense of loss or annoyance without being considered disturbed. As long as you don't let these occasional setbacks become major, what is wrong with " being angry " and why should there be a term for it other than " mildly annoyed " ? Ron Dobrin www.dolfzine.com New York City ------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.