Guest guest Posted April 28, 2002 Report Share Posted April 28, 2002 --- In @y...: Generalist docs admit to ignorance of genetics By Merritt McKinney NEW YORK, Apr 02 (Reuters Health) - Don't feel bad if reading a news story about the most recent genetic breakthrough makes your head spin. A new study from Australia suggests that many doctors feel equally overwhelmed by the latest genetic information. " General practitioners are expected to know so much these days, and they already feel overwhelmed, " Dr. Sylvia Metcalfe, of the University of Melbourne, told Reuters Health. Since there are not enough specialists to deal with the growing demand for genetic services, the job of explaining genetic information will fall primarily on general practitioners, Metcalfe and her colleagues note in a report in the March/April issue of the journal Genetics in Medicine. " It is important that education programs deal with what is relevant to them in their daily practice, " Metcalfe said. Now that the human genome--the genetic road map of human development and function--has been almost completely decoded, there has been an explosion of genetic information. Little is known about how prepared general practitioners--who are often a patient's first contact with the healthcare system--are to deal with this genetic information. To find out what general practitioners know about genetics, Metcalfe's team conducted focus groups, interviews and surveys of generalist physicians and focus groups with genetics experts. They also held a discussion with patients with genetic diseases and their family members. Overall, doctors rated their genetics knowledge as " extremely poor. " In fact, physicians often felt that their patients were more knowledgeable about genetic conditions. " They've searched the Net and seen all the specialists so I feel a bit like a fish out of water there, " said one doctor. The investigators also found that doctors rarely ordered genetic testing for their patients. More than 60% said they never or almost never ordered such tests. And when they did order genetic testing, they often did not feel prepared to interpret the results. Many doctors also had little experience in referring patients to genetics experts. " General practitioners need to have access to simple and relevant information with up-to-date referral contacts, " Metcalfe said. " They need to be able to recognize when a condition has a genetic component, how to take a thorough family history and how to refer to genetics services, " she noted. Metcalfe pointed out that general practitioners expressed interest in getting better at counseling patients and explaining the results of genetic tests. Communication about genetic information was also important to patients and families. " They would like to see general practitioners listen more to families, with greater emphasis on communication skills, and to know where to refer families, " Metcalfe added. According to Drs. J. Hayflick and M. Patrice Eiff at Oregon Health and Science University in Portland, the focus of physician education should be on how to " consider genetics in every patient encounter " rather than on specific genetic information. In a related editorial, they call for genetic education that encourages doctors to " think genetically " with every patient. SOURCE: Genetics in Medicine 2002;4:71-77. --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 28, 2002 Report Share Posted April 28, 2002 Generalist docs admit to ignorance of genetics By Merritt McKinney NEW YORK, Apr 02 (Reuters Health) - Don't feel bad if reading a news story about the most recent genetic breakthrough makes your head spin. A new study from Australia suggests that many doctors feel equally overwhelmed by the latest genetic information. " General practitioners are expected to know so much these days, and they already feel overwhelmed, " Dr. Sylvia Metcalfe, of the University of Melbourne, told Reuters Health. Since there are not enough specialists to deal with the growing demand for genetic services, the job of explaining genetic information will fall primarily on general practitioners, Metcalfe and her colleagues note in a report in the March/April issue of the journal Genetics in Medicine. " It is important that education programs deal with what is relevant to them in their daily practice, " Metcalfe said. Now that the human genome--the genetic road map of human development and function--has been almost completely decoded, there has been an explosion of genetic information. Little is known about how prepared general practitioners--who are often a patient's first contact with the healthcare system--are to deal with this genetic information. To find out what general practitioners know about genetics, Metcalfe's team conducted focus groups, interviews and surveys of generalist physicians and focus groups with genetics experts. They also held a discussion with patients with genetic diseases and their family members. Overall, doctors rated their genetics knowledge as " extremely poor. " In fact, physicians often felt that their patients were more knowledgeable about genetic conditions. " They've searched the Net and seen all the specialists so I feel a bit like a fish out of water there, " said one doctor. The investigators also found that doctors rarely ordered genetic testing for their patients. More than 60% said they never or almost never ordered such tests. And when they did order genetic testing, they often did not feel prepared to interpret the results. Many doctors also had little experience in referring patients to genetics experts. " General practitioners need to have access to simple and relevant information with up-to-date referral contacts, " Metcalfe said. " They need to be able to recognize when a condition has a genetic component, how to take a thorough family history and how to refer to genetics services, " she noted. Metcalfe pointed out that general practitioners expressed interest in getting better at counseling patients and explaining the results of genetic tests. Communication about genetic information was also important to patients and families. " They would like to see general practitioners listen more to families, with greater emphasis on communication skills, and to know where to refer families, " Metcalfe added. According to Drs. J. Hayflick and M. Patrice Eiff at Oregon Health and Science University in Portland, the focus of physician education should be on how to " consider genetics in every patient encounter " rather than on specific genetic information. In a related editorial, they call for genetic education that encourages doctors to " think genetically " with every patient. SOURCE: Genetics in Medicine 2002;4:71-77. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.