Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Comparative fracture risk in vegetarians and nonvegetarians

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007 Feb 7; [Epub ahead of print]Comparative fracture risk in vegetarians and nonvegetarians inEPIC-Oxford.Appleby P, Roddam A, N, Key T.Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of ClinicalMedicine, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, UK.Objective: To compare fracture rates in four diet groups (meat eaters,fish eaters, vegetarians and vegans) in the Oxford cohort of theEuropean Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Oxford) .Design: Prospective cohort study of self-reported fracture risk atfollow-up. Setting: The United Kingdom. Subjects: A total of 7947 men and 26 749 women aged 20-89 years,including 19 249 meat eaters, 4901 fish eaters, 9420 vegetarians

and1126 vegans, recruited by postal methods and through general practicesurgeries. Methods: regression. Results: Over an average of 5.2 years of follow-up, 343 men and 1555women reported one or more fractures. Compared with meat eaters,fracture incidence rate ratios in men and women combined adjusted forsex, age and non-dietary factors were 1.01 (95% CI 0.88-1.17) for fisheaters, 1.00 (0.89-1.13) for vegetarians and 1.30 (1.02-1.66) forvegans. After further adjustment for dietary energy and calcium intakethe incidence rate ratio among vegans compared with meat eaters was 1.15(0.89-1.49). Among subjects consuming at least 525 mg/day calcium thecorresponding incidence rate ratios were 1.05 (0.90-1.21) for fisheaters, 1.02 (0.90-1.15) for vegetarians and 1.00 (0.69-1.44) for vegans. Conclusions: In this population, fracture risk was similar for meateaters, fish eaters and

vegetarians. The higher fracture risk in thevegans appeared to be a consequence of their considerably lower meancalcium intake. An adequate calcium intake is essential for bone health,irrespective of dietary preferences. Sponsorship: The EPIC-Oxford study is supported by The Medical ResearchCouncil and Cancer Research UK. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition advance online publication, 7February 2007; doi:10.1038/ sj.ejcn.1602659.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...