Guest guest Posted February 12, 2007 Report Share Posted February 12, 2007 CR or drugs may be comparable for longevity, suggests the paper below, which is available in pdf format. Caloric restriction versus drug therapy to delay the onset of aging diseases and extend life (Review) Age 27 (1) Mar 2005, 39-48 Arthur V. Everitt, S. Roth, G. Le Couteur and N. Hilmer Abstract There are two firmly established methods of prolonging life. Calorie restriction (CR) using nutrient-rich diets to prolong life in lower animals, and life saving medications in humans to delay the development of the major diseases of middle and old age. These two approaches have different mechanisms of action. In rats, CR at 40% below ad libitum intake begun soon after weaning and continued until death, reduces body weight by about 40% and increases lifespan. There have been no lifelong CR studies performed on humans. However, in healthy adult human subjects about 20% CR over a period of 2-15 years, lowers body weight by about 20% and decreases body mass index (BMI) to about 19. This CR treatment in humans reduces blood pressure and blood cholesterol to a similar extent as the specific drugs used to delay the onset of vascular disease and so extend human life. These same drugs may act by mechanisms that overlap with some of the mechanisms of CR in retarding these pathologies and thus may have similar antiaging and life prolonging actions. Such drugs may be regarded as CR mimetics which inhibit the development of certain life shortening diseases, without the need to lower calorie intake. In developed countries, better medical care, drug therapy, vaccinations, and other public health measures have extended human life by about 30 years during the 20th century without recourse to CR, which is so effective in the rat. The percentage gain in human life expectancy during the 20th century is twice that achieved by CR in rat survival. However, rat longevity studies now use specific pathogen-free animals and start CR after weaning or later, thereby excluding deaths from infectious diseases and those associated with birth and early life. There is a need to develop CR mimetics which can delay the development of life-threatening diseases in humans. In the 21st century due to the human epidemic of overeating with a sedentary lifestyle, it may necessary to utilize CR to counter the aging effects of overweight. Since the greatest life-extending effects of CR in the rodent occur when started early in life, long-term antiaging therapy in humans should be initiated soon after maturity, when physiological systems have developed optimally. Table 2. Gains in life expectancy at birth of human populations in 10 developed countries during the 20th century due to improvements in public health and medical care compared with the increased survival of male laboratory rats in 10 long-term 40% calorie restriction studies. ==================================== >>>>>>>>>>>>Human life expectancy in years---Mean or median rat survival in days Country 1900 2002 %Gain---Rat strain (ref.) Control CR %Gain ==================================== >>>Japan 44.5 81.9 84.0---F344 (Yu et al. 1982) 701 986 40.7 >>>Switzerland 50.7 80.6 59.0---BN (Sprott 1997) 903 1,078 19.4 >>>Sweden 55.8 80.4 44.0---BN (Turturro et al. 1999) 935 1,115 19.3 >>>Australia 56.5 80.4 42.3---F344xBN (Turturro et al. 1999) 890 1,180 32.6 >>>France 47.0 79.7 69.6---F344 NIH (Turturro et al. 1999) 760 855 12.5 >>>Italy 44.5 79.7 79.1---F344 PUR (Turturro et al. 1999) 740 910 23.0 >>>New Zealand 59.4 78.9 32.8---F344 (Thurman et al. 1994) 707 875 23.8 >>>Germany 46.6 78.7 68.9---Sprague-Dawley (Keenan et al. 1994) 595 728 22.4 >>>United Kingdom 50.5 78.2 54.9---Sprague-Dawley (Barrows and Kokkonen 1982) 706 924 30.9 >>>USA 49.3 77.3 56.8 ---Long- (Holloszy 1997) 858 1,051 22.5 >>>Mean 50.5 79.6 59.1---Mean 779.5 970.2 24.7 >>>Standard dev 4.94 1.27 15.7---Standard dev 105.2 130.4 7.59 ==================================== >>>Data for Human Life Expectancy in 1900 are taken from the United Nations Statistical Yearbook 1955 (United Nations 1957). >>>Data for Human Life Expectancy in 2002 are taken from the World Health Report 2003 (World Health Organization 2003). >>>Survival in rodents varies with the strain (Masoro 2002b). >>>The difference in % gain in survival of humans and rats was significant (t-test, P <0.001). -- Al Pater, alpater@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.