Guest guest Posted February 17, 2007 Report Share Posted February 17, 2007 Hi folks: A little more on methionine (MET). Here are six papers which indicate that certain very common types of cancer are dependent on MET for their survival/proliferation. Two of the papers are quite old (1993). But the other four are from 1999, 2001, 2002 and 2003: Here are some excerpts from one of them: " Discussion. The results in this report demonstrate that ........... methionine dependence occurs in a sizeable proportion of fresh human tumors. Thus 5 of 21 human tumors analyzed ........ were determined to be methionine dependent " . (Those were cancers of the breast, colon, melanoma, ovary and prostate. Three of these are very common cancers.) Further: " In this light, recent in vivo studies of the effects of methionine depletion by both dietary and enzymatic means have indicated anti-tumor efficacy. Methionine depletion has also led to tumor cell cycle arrest in vivo " . " In summary, the results presented in this report indicate that fresh human solid tumors frequently express methionine dependence and suggest that methionine is a potential target for cancer chemotherapy " . PMID: 8495409 Other papers with broadly similar implications include: PMID: 14585289 PMID: 11925597 PMID: 11551827 PMID: 10473100 PMID: 8242623 Rodney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2007 Report Share Posted February 19, 2007 Rodney posted another mail about studies indicating benefits of Met restriction, this time on met-dependent cancer. Together with his major post recently about MetR, it seems hard indeed not to incorporate a certain met restriction into one's diet. In a cursory search of the archives of both CR-lists I just found a year-old study not showing MetR benefits. It doesn't proving anything more than there is always a study showing the opposite, but here it is anyway. I can always use it to motivate why I only go for partial MetR because going down to that one gram of methionine per day is just too hard...... // Ulf From Dr. J Masoro, Dept Physiology, Univ Texas> Quote from Dr. Ed's Laboratory Research paper below:>> ----------> "Recently, methionine restriction has received wide> acclaim including speculation that it may play a role in> FR-induced life extension. In my opinion, work on rats done> in our laboratory makes it unlikely that this speculation is> correct, at least for that species (4). >> We found that a long term 40% reduction in food intake > without a reduction in methionine intake extends the life > of rats to the same extent as a 40% reduction of both food > and methionine intake does (Table 1). Thus, it is clear > that methionine intake need not be decreased for FR to > markedly extend the life of rats.">> ---------> Masoro EJ.> Caloric Restriction and Aging: Controversial Issues.> J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006 Jan;61(1):14-19.> PMID: 16456190 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.