Guest guest Posted May 18, 2007 Report Share Posted May 18, 2007 While this may be a semantic distinction, how about lowering SBP without lowering DBP? Isn't high SBP also bad?While I don't have a high degree of confidence in the BP meter at my dentist's office, and this is one rat anecdotal, but a recent reading of mine was higher SBP above my normal than the DBP was above normal while both were elevated. So the opposite of white coat hypertension is what, meditation ? Ommmmmm.JRPS: 137/76 is probably normal for ad libbers my age, but very high for me..On May 18, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Rodney wrote:SBP a HIGHER level of DBP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2007 Report Share Posted May 18, 2007 Hi Rodney, How about exercise? http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/104/2/221 Exercise Training Attenuates Age-Associated Diastolic Dysfunction in Rats A. Brenner, MA; Carl S. Apstein, MD; Kurt W. Saupe, PhD From the Cardiac Muscle Research Laboratory, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass. Correspondence to Kurt W. Saupe, PhD, Cardiac Muscle Research Laboratory, 650 Albany St, X720, Boston, MA 02118. E-mail ksaupe@... Background—— In contrast to systolic function, which is relatively well preserved with advancing age, diastolic function declines steadily after age 30. Our goal was to determine whether changes in diastolic function that occur with aging could be reversed with exercise training. Methods and Results—— Adult (6-month-old) and old (24-month-old) Fischer 344/BNF1 rats were studied after either 12 weeks of treadmill training or normal sedentary cage life. Three aspects of diastolic function were studied: (1) left ventricular (LV) filling in vivo via Doppler echocardiograph, (2) LV passive compliance, and (3) the degree of ischemia-induced LV stiffening. Maximal exercise capacity was lower in the old rats (18±1 minutes to exhaustion on a standard treadmill) than in the adult rats (25±1 minutes). Training increased exercise capacity by 43% in the old rats and 46% in the adults (to 26±1 and 37±1 minutes, respectively). Echocardiographic indices of LV relaxation were significantly lower in the old rats, but with training, they increased back to the levels seen in the adults. LV stiffness measured in the isolated, perfused hearts was not affected by age or training. Also in the isolated hearts, the LV stiffened more rapidly during low-flow ischemia in the old hearts than in the adults, but training eliminated this age-associated difference in the response to ischemia. Conclusions—— Our findings indicate that in rats, some age-associated changes in diastolic function are reversible and thus may not be intrinsic to aging but instead secondary to other processes, such as deconditioning. > > Hi folks: > > In post #25553 I provided some material on pulse pressure. It > suggested that in older people for any given SBP a HIGHER level of DBP > was healthier. > > Right at the end of the post I added a single question. No one seems > to have responded to it so I wonder if anyone got that far reading the > post (!) > > It may be an important issue if what was reported elsewhere in that > post is accurate. So here is the question again: > > ************************************************************ > " Any suggestions for ways to raise DBP without raising SBP? " > ************************************************************ > > Any thoughts? > > Rodney. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 Rodney wrote: > In post #25553 I provided some material on pulse pressure. It > suggested that in older people for any given SBP a HIGHER level > of DBP was healthier. <snip> > Any thoughts? The 2nd (older) study below shows reduced pulse pressures. Thanks, Todd 1: J Hypertens. 2007 Mar;25(3):577-83. Advanced glycation endproduct crosslink breaker (alagebrium) improves endothelial function in patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Zieman SJ, Melenovsky V, Clattenburg L, Corretti MC, Capriotti A, Gerstenblith G, Kass DA. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The s Hopkins University School of Medicine OBJECTIVES: Arterial stiffening and endothelial dysfunction are hallmarks of aging, and advanced glycation endproducts (AGE) may contribute to these changes. We tested the hypothesis that AGE crosslink breakers enhance endothelial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) in humans and examined the potential mechanisms for this effect. METHODS: Thirteen adults (nine men, aged 65 +/- 2 years) with isolated systolic hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg or pulse pressure > 60 mmHg) <snip> RESULTS: Alagebrium reduced carotid AI by 37% (P = 0.007) and augmented pressure (16.4 +/- 10 to 9.6 +/- 9 mmHg; P < 0.001). Heart rate, arterial pressures, and ArtD, were unchanged. FMD increased from 4.6 +/- 1.1 to 7.1 +/- 1.1% with alagebrium (P < 0.05), and was unrelated to altered shear stress or regional arterial distensibility. <snip> CONCLUSIONS: Alagebrium enhances peripheral artery endothelial function and improves overall impedance matching. Improved endothelial function correlates better with reduced vascular fibrosis and inflammation markers than with vessel distensibility. AGE-crosslink breakers may reduce cardiovascular risk in older adults by reduced central arterial stiffness and vascular remodeling. PMID: 17278974 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 2: Circulation. 2001 Sep 25;104(13):1464-70. Improved arterial compliance by a novel advanced glycation end-product crosslink breaker. Kass DA, Shapiro EP, Kawaguchi M, Capriotti AR, Scuteri A, deGroof RC, Lakatta EG. Division of Cardiology, The s Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD BACKGROUND: Arterial stiffening with increased pulse pressure is a leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease in the elderly. We tested whether ALT-711, a novel nonenzymatic breaker of advanced glycation end-product crosslinks, selectively improves arterial compliance and lowers pulse pressure in older individuals with vascular stiffening. METHODS AND RESULTS: Nine US centers recruited and randomly assigned subjects with resting arterial pulse pressures >60 mm Hg and systolic pressures >140 mm Hg to once-daily ALT-711 (210 mg; n=62)or placebo (n=31) for 56 days. <snip> ALT-711 netted a greater decline in pulse pressures than placebo (-5.3 versus -0.6 mm Hg at day 56; P=0.034 for treatment effect by repeated-measures ANOVA). Systolic pressure declined in both groups, but diastolic pressure fell less with ALT-711 (P=0.056). <snip> PMID: 11571237 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 Seems the general scientific consensus is that a widening " pulse pressure " is due (at least in part) due to large artery stiffness (aorta etc). I, personally, would not want to increase any component of my BP as the interrelationships are not perfectly understood. Although my pulse pressure is ~30 at this time ) I guess the answer is continue to CRON, monitor cardio with frequent ck'ups and tests and hope the stiffness attenuates. 1) What is the most important component of blood pressure: systolic, diastolic or pulse pressure? RECENT FINDINGS: Generally, in studies in which readings of systolic and diastolic blood pressure have been compared, systolic blood pressure has been a better predictor of risk. Moreover, isolated systolic hypertension predicts risk better than isolated diastolic hypertension, and the treatment of both isolated systolic hypertension and combined hypertension has reduced cardiovascular events. There are no treatment studies of isolated diastolic hypertension. Pulse pressure reflects stiffening of large arteries and is associated with several cardiovascular risk factors. Pulse pressure also predicts events in epidemiologic studies, but elucidation of an independent role is hampered by the close correlation between pulse pressure and systolic blood pressure. 2)Is systolic pressure a better target for antihypertensive treatment than diastolic pressure? In elderly subjects the increased stiffness of large arteries is responsible for the early reflection of pulse wave and for the decrease in diastolic blood pressure due to reduced recoil of large arteries. This is summarized in the increase in pulse pressure, which is directly related to the risk of cardiovascular complications. Last, but not least a mechanical description: 3)Increased elastance (or stiffness, inverse of compliance) of the central elastic arteries is the primary cause of increased systolic and pulse pressure with advancing age and in patients with cardiovascular disease, including hypertension, and is due to degeneration and hyperplasia of the arterial wall; diastolic pressure decreases as arterial elastance increases. As elastance increases, transmission velocity of both forward and backward (or reflected) traveling waves increases, which causes the reflected wave to arrive earlier in the central aorta and augments pressure in late systole. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Jan;6(1):5-21. Links Arterial elastance and wave reflection augmentation of systolic blood pressure: deleterious effects and implications for therapy. PMID: 11452332 > > Hi folks: > > In post #25553 I provided some material on pulse pressure. It > suggested that in older people for any given SBP a HIGHER level of DBP > was healthier. > > Right at the end of the post I added a single question. No one seems > to have responded to it so I wonder if anyone got that far reading the > post (!) > > It may be an important issue if what was reported elsewhere in that > post is accurate. So here is the question again: > > ************************************************************ > " Any suggestions for ways to raise DBP without raising SBP? " > ************************************************************ > > Any thoughts? > > Rodney. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 20, 2007 Report Share Posted May 20, 2007 Hi Rodney I can't offer technical references but can offer my one rat experiment. Being vegetarian my sources of protein have been brewer's yeast, rice bran powder, whey powder and hemp powder. My DBP was going up and up. I actually have stopped using these, except in very small amounts, as for example a teaspoon of brewer's yeast in a soup, for example, or some whey poweder in the ingredients for a vegetarian dehydrated jerkey I make. I also resumed my daily yoga, which I had interrupted due to work related travel. So in my personal case, some sodium, less exercise and possible overconsumption of protein supplements drove up the DBP. In my case, that is not welcome, so I'm changing my behavior. I wrote about it in an entry in my blog today. I do not know if it is prudent to look for nutritional ways to raise DBP. It's like when my cholesterol levels were low and I was started consuming eggs. I realized that raising dietary cholesterol might raise my blood cholesterol, but also increase atherogenesis. So I stopped consuming eggs. Cheers, Arturo -------------------------- Factors with Differential Effects on DBP and SBP Posted by: " Rodney " perspect1111@... perspect1111 Fri May 18, 2007 11:50 am (PST) Hi folks: <snip> ************************************************************ " Any suggestions for ways to raise DBP without raising SBP? " ************************************************************ Any thoughts? Rodney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 20, 2007 Report Share Posted May 20, 2007 Hi Arturo: Thanks for that input. Perhaps I need to elaborate on my original question and ask you a couple too : ^ ))) First, in my own one-mouse experiment as my weight varies, my blood pressure varies with it. But not only that. What I found is that when my weight dropped ~25 pounds my systolic dropped by quite a bit MORE than 25 points, while my diastolic dropped by quite a lot LESS than 25 points. So my pulse pressure (PP) improved with declining weight. And this has seemed to be true with each of the gyrations (there were several, lol) in my weight on the way down. So this was not just a single isolated aberration. One implication of this is that studies which claim to have found that a particular behaviour benefits pulse pressure had better take account of changing body weight, or it may be that the pulse pressure benefit may have been attributable to the change in weight rather than the 'treatment' being studied. Of course, when I asked if anyone knew of ways to raise diastolic while keeping systolic unchanged, lowering systolic while keeping diastolic unchanged would be just about as good. The situation I was thinking of when I asked the question was how those, like the WUSTL subjects, who already had their SBP down to 100 could get their PP below 40 by raising their diastolic. For most people over age 60 diastolic tends to fall anyway, while systolic generally rises. So it would be helpful if we could do something to prevent this fall in diastolic, and keep PP under 40. Also, logical though it is, I am skeptical about claims that high PP reflects poor elasticity of the arteries. Since PP can be improved (at least in my case) simply by going on CRON are we to suppose that CRON improves elasticity? Or is it that the elasticity is purely a function of plaque deposits in the arteries, which CRON seems to clean out - according to the carotid IMT data? You mention yeast, rice bran, whey and hemp as apparently raising your DBP. Are you saying that your impression is that they did not raise your SBP at the same time? You mention also the rise in your cholesterol. I am not suggesting that it is a good idea to raise low lipids values. Only that there may very well be benefit in raising DBP in order to lower PP to a level consistently below 40. Rodney. > > Hi Rodney > I can't offer technical references but can offer my > one rat experiment. Being vegetarian my sources of > protein have been brewer's yeast, rice bran powder, > whey powder and hemp powder. My DBP was going up > and up. I actually have stopped using these, except > in very small amounts, as for example a teaspoon of > brewer's yeast in a soup, for example, or some whey > poweder in the ingredients for a vegetarian > dehydrated jerkey I make. I also resumed my daily > yoga, which I had interrupted due to work related > travel. So in my personal case, some sodium, less > exercise and possible overconsumption of protein > supplements drove up the DBP. In my case, that is > not welcome, so I'm changing my behavior. I > wrote about it in an entry in my blog today. I > do not know if it is prudent to look for nutritional > ways to raise DBP. It's like when my cholesterol > levels were low and I was started consuming eggs. > I realized that raising dietary cholesterol might > raise my blood cholesterol, but also increase > atherogenesis. So I stopped consuming eggs. > > Cheers, > Arturo > -------------------------- > Factors with Differential Effects on DBP and SBP > Posted by: " Rodney " perspect1111@... perspect1111 > Fri May 18, 2007 11:50 am (PST) > Hi folks: > <snip> > > ************************************************************ > " Any suggestions for ways to raise DBP without raising SBP? " > ************************************************************ > > Any thoughts? > > Rodney. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 21, 2007 Report Share Posted May 21, 2007 Hi Rodney Yes, my impression is that in the past three weeks my DBP was moving up (84, 88, 90, etc) while the SBP was not moving up, staying in the range of 131. The SBP moved up to 139 only on the day that the DBP shot way up to 97. For me at least that means an episode of borderline hypertension based on past advice from physicians, hence that is why I'm experimenting with greatly reducing these protein supplements. I'm planning to keep my protein consumption ratio to about 15% daily instead of 25% daily. Thanks, Arturo Re: Factors with Differential Effects on DBP and SBP Posted by: " Rodney " perspect1111@... perspect1111 Sun May 20, 2007 1:46 pm (PST) Hi Arturo: Thanks for that input. Perhaps I need to elaborate on my original question and ask you a couple too : ^ ))) <snip> You mention yeast, rice bran, whey and hemp as apparently raising your DBP. Are you saying that your impression is that they did not raise your SBP at the same time? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.