Guest guest Posted October 24, 2007 Report Share Posted October 24, 2007 It's difficult to gauge from your post whether the studies refer to the effects of increasing the *proportion* of Omega-6 relative to some canonical fat consumption profile (made up of various types of fat, including many types), or whether it's a more absolute statement about increasing Omega-6 regardless of one's current total fat intake? Thanks, -Dave > > Al brought to our attention an issue of J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). > 2007 Sep;8 Suppl 1 ( http://tinyurl.com/2arzcc ) that has several > important papers about essential dietary fatty acids. This one had > some interesting comments about the proportion of the fatty acids: > > Willett WC. > The role of dietary n-6 fatty acids in the prevention of cardiovascular > disease. > J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2007 Sep;8 Suppl 1:S42-5. > PMID: 17876199 > > Abstract > > n-6 Fatty acids, like n-3 fatty acids, play essential roles in many > biological functions. Because n-6 fatty acids are the precursors of > proinflammatory eicosanoids, higher intakes have been suggested to be > detrimental, and the ratio of n-6 to n-3 fatty acids has been > suggested by > some to be particularly important. However, this hypothesis is based on > minimal evidence, and in humans higher intakes of n-6 fatty acids have > not > been associated with elevated levels of inflammatory markers. > ================================= > n-6 Fatty acids have long been known to reduce serum total and > low-density > lipoprotein cholesterol, and increases in polyunsaturated fat intake, > mostly > as n-6 fatty acids, were a cornerstone of dietary advice during the 1960s > and 1970s. In the United States, for example, intake of n-6 fatty acids > doubled and coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality fell by 50% over a > period > of several decades. In a series of relatively small, older randomized > trials, in which intakes of polyunsaturated fat were increased (even > up to > 20% of calories), rates of CHD were generally reduced. In a more recent > detailed examination of fatty acid intake within the Nurses' Health > Study, > greater intake of linoleic acid, up to about 8% of energy, has been > strongly > related to lower incidence of myocardial infarction or CHD death. Because > n-3 fatty acids were also related inversely to risk of CHD, the ratio was > unrelated to risk. n-6 Fatty acids reduce insulin resistance, probably by > acting as a ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated > receptors-[gamma], > and intakes have been inversely related to risk of type 2 diabetes. > > Adequate intakes of both n-6 and n-3 fatty acids are essential for good > health and low rates of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, > but the > ratio of these fatty acids is not useful. Reductions of linoleic acid to > " improve " this ratio would likely increase rates of cardiovascular > disease > and diabetes. > > ... > > Effects of linoleic acid on blood lipids > > The role of polyunsaturated fat (which is primarily LA) in reducing blood > total cholesterol levels became well recognized in the 1960s. This effect > was documented in dozens of controlled feeding studies that were > summarized > by the Keys and Hegsted equations [4,5]. These equations demonstrated > nearly > identical results, with saturated fat positively related to serum > cholesterol and polyunsaturated fat inversely related to serum > cholesterol. > Primarily on the basis of the Keys and Hegsted equations, dietary > recommendations in the United States and other western countries > between the > 1960s and early 1980s included advice to replace saturated fat with > polyunsaturated fat, because this would have a double benefit in reducing > total serum cholesterol. As a result of these recommendations, > consumption > of polyunsaturated fat (primarily LA) in the United States increased from > ~3% of energy in the 1950s to ~6-7% of energy by the late 1980s [6,7]. > This > dietary change was confirmed by large increases in the LA content of > adipose > samples; concentrations increased from about 8.5% in 1962 and about > 10% in > 1966 [8] to 17% to 19% in the 1980s [9-11]. > > More recently, using data from 61 controlled feeding studies, Mensink > et al. > [12] assessed the effects of dietary fats on not only blood total > cholesterol, but also low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, > high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides. This > analysis > demonstrated that compared to carbohydrate, polyunsaturated fat > reduces LDL > cholesterol, increases HDL cholesterol, and reduces triglycerides > [12]; each > of these effects favors lower risk of CHD. Indeed, compared to all other > classes of fatty acids, LA produces the most favorable lipid changes, as > reflected by the lowest ratio of LDL to HDL cholesterol. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.