Guest guest Posted August 21, 2007 Report Share Posted August 21, 2007 > 1: Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007 Aug 15; [Epub ahead of > print] Links > > Should snacks be recommended in obesity treatment? a > 1-year randomized clinical trial. > Bertéus Forslund H, Klingström S, Hagberg H, Löndahl > M, Torgerson JS, Lindroos AK. > 1Department of Metabolism and Cardiovascular > Research, Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg University, > Göteborg, Sweden. > Objective:To study the effect to recommend no snacks > vs three snacks per day on 1-year weight loss. The > hypothesis was that it is easier to control energy > intake and lose weight if snacks in between meals > are omitted.Subjects/Method:In total 140 patients > (36 men, 104 women), aged 18-60 years and body mass > index>30 kg/m(2) were randomized and 93 patients (27 > men, 66 women) completed the study. A 1-year > randomized intervention trial was conducted with two > treatment arms with different eating frequencies; 3 > meals/day (3M) or 3 meals and 3 snacks/day (3+3M). > The patients received regular and individualized > counseling by dieticians. Information on eating > patterns, dietary intake, weight and metabolic > variables was collected at baseline and after 1 > year.Results:Over 1 year the 3M group reported a > decrease in the number of snacks whereas the 3+3M > group reported an increase (-1.1 vs +0.4 snacks/day, > respectively, P<0.0001). Both groups decreased > energy intake > and E% (energy percent) fat and increased E% > protein and fiber intake but there was no > differences between the groups. Both groups lost > weight, but there was no significant difference in > weight loss after 1 year of treatment (3M vs > 3+3M=-4.1+/-6.1 vs -5.9+/-9.4 kg; P=0.31). Changes > in metabolic variables did not differ between the > groups, except for high-density lipoprotein that > increased in the 3M group but not in 3+3M group > (P<0.033 for group > difference).Conclusion:Recommending snacks or not > between meals does not influence 1-year weight loss. > European Journal of Clinical Nutrition advance > online publication, 15 August 2007; > doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602860. > PMID: 17700649 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.