Guest guest Posted September 26, 2007 Report Share Posted September 26, 2007 Hi folks: I am beginning to think the 'high glycemic index foods cause fatty liver disease' hypothesis makes absolutely no sense. Anyone have an alternative suggestion? From: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7006191.stm " A diet rich in potatoes, white bread and white rice may be contributing to a 'silent epidemic' of a dangerous liver condition. " and: " High GI foods: Mashed potato White bread Chips Some breakfast cereals ... Steamed white rice " If there is an epidemic, now, of fatty liver disease, why is it happening now and why has it not been happening since, pretty much, the beginning of civilization? My understanding is that the transition from nomadic lifestyles to living in urban centers occurred about 10,000 years ago in what is now Iraq, and was based on the growing of wheat and the production of bread, a system which finally was able to provide enough calories to comfortably sustain a large, local, non-nomadic population. How come we have not been suffering from fatty liver disease ever since? The irish for centuries relied on the potato for a huge proportion of their caloric intake, until the potato famine of 1846 (?) wiped out a sizeable proportion of the population. So why are we not informed that the irish for centuries have been afflicted with fatty liver disease? And the chinese have been eating lots of white rice for millennia. Have they all been suffering an early demise from fatty liver disease? If so how come we don't know about it? There may be answers to all these questions. If so, then I will need to hear what they are, before I can take this research seriously. IMO Rodney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.