Guest guest Posted January 6, 2008 Report Share Posted January 6, 2008 > > >>>Dr. Fontana may be right when he suggests that severe CR may not > be best for lean normal weight individuals. Jeff's original post, > and some of the follow-on posts from people with similar issues, > also suggest that CR may be less appropriate, or at least more > difficult, for already lean people than for those who have a > tendency to be overweight. ' > It is my opinion that if someone is already lean, unless they are engaging in an enormous amount of exercise, then they are already practicing CR to some degree or more. How else could they be lean? Therefore, I think their focus should be on the ON part Regards Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 > , > The interesting thing (to me) is that our experience practicing > CRON, your experience as a naturally thin person and mine as the proud > owner of the " thifty gene " , makes it appear that humans respond to > CRON just as mice do. I understand that much more data would be > needed to scientifically establish the relationship, but it is > interesting. > Thanks but I disagree with most all of the above and don't know where you got the idea that I agree with the above. I believe that many of us who are alive today are descendants of ancestors who had the thrifty gene. Not just some of us, but most all of us because otherwise, most of us wouldnt have been here. That is why so many of us (>65%) are battling the weight issue. And, regardless of the exact percent of those of us who do have this gene, those who do have it, have had it for multiple generations upon multiple generations, etc. We didnt get it recently but it has been passed on down for centuries. So, the real question is, if the gene has been laying dormant for so many years, what is it about our time now, that has made the gene express itself? And in so many people who have had it lay dormant for so many years, all at once? Second, Trust me, you may think I am " naturally " thin, but I can load the pounds on in a heartbeat and most of my family and close relatives are overweight/obese and suffer from CVD, DB, HTN and Cancer. I am one of the only ones who doesn't. When in college, I was able to pack on weight very easy from " excesses " . My dad, who is built like me, does the same, and worst of all, mostly in the abdomen. My dad is overweight now, and had 2 massive heart attacks in his 50s. His dad died of one at the age 50 and was overweight. They both engaged in physically demanding work. He also suffers from HTN and DB. My mom is overweight and suffers from DB, and HTN. My brothers are either overweight or obese with heart disease. My cousins are all overweight or obese and have similar situation and a number of them have suffered from cancers. The only difference between my thin disease free life and them, is my strict adherence to my lifestyle. The only other family member who is also thin and disease free is my sister, who like me, is also a strict adherent to a similar lifestyle as me. Third, if you look closely at the Minnesota Starvation experiment, and what we know of the holocaust survivors and other similar situations, when humans are starved, they all get thin. No exceptions that I know of. I dont remember seeing any pictures or hearing of any accounts from survivors of starved people who remained thin. Same with the MN experiment, the biosphere, NWCR, hunger strikes, etc etc etc. If someone knows of data where humans underwent severe CR for an extended period and stayed obese/overweight or even a somewhat " normal " weight (as you described it). In addition, having participated in the treatment of around 2500 patients a year for the last 10 years, I met many who made similar claims about their inability to lose weight due to their thrifty genes before enrolling. However, once enrolled in the controlled environment, they were able to lose weight, and often at a calorie level above what they said they were eating before when they couldnt lose weight. As the studies that were just posted here showed, many parents of obese kids today do not see their kids as being heavy or overweight, let alone obese. Perception vs reality is a huge issue in todays world/environment. I believe my original point was misunderstood and maybe that is my fault as they first time I explained a while back, the same thing happened. In response the comments about CR-ON not being applicable to people who are already thin. my response is this... If they are thin, and not engaging in excessive exercise, then they can only be thin if they are practicing some sort of CR right now. Let us use me as an example. Many years ago, i was thin but I wasnt practicing CRON. But to be thin, and stay thin, I had to be practicing some level of CR in my life. How do I know? Because when I didn't and I indulged in excess, I could easily put on 20 if not 30 pounds. So, to maintain my lighter weight over time, I had to be practicing CR over time. And when i saw the weight go up, I knew how to get it off, cut out calories. However, while i must have been doing the CR part, to remain thin, I wasnt doing the ON part as I didnt care about the quality of what i ate. So, for me at that point to practice CRON, I did not need to do anymore CR (which is what i believe the researchers are saying) but that is because I am already doing more than enough. But , what i know need to do, is learn and implement the ON part. And, as we all know, the benefit is not from the CR alone but from the CRON. I hope that clarifies my position Thanks Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 Amen. I wish I had a dollar for every “thin” newbie who posts and doesn’t understand that getting thinner should not be their objective. As Walford states: if you are already thin, you either shouldn’t lose any more weight or certainly not lose very much. Their objective should be to optimize their “ON” part of CRON (which often naturally results in some weight loss anyway). From: Novick <jnovickrd@...> Reply-< > Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 00:40:06 -0500 < > Subject: Re: [ ] Biomarkers ...Re: Need Advice on Stabilizing Weight (Optimum BMI for longevity) However, while i must have been doing the CR part, to remain thin, I wasnt doing the ON part as I didnt care about the quality of what i ate. So, for me at that point to practice CRON, I did not need to do anymore CR (which is what i believe the researchers are saying) but that is because I am already doing more than enough. But , what i know need to do, is learn and implement the ON part. And, as we all know, the benefit is not from the CR alone but from the CRON. I hope that clarifies my position Thanks Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.