Guest guest Posted May 11, 2006 Report Share Posted May 11, 2006 Boy this made my bad day even worse..... http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/11/nsa.phonerecords.ap/index.html USA Today: NSA building massive database of phone records Thursday, May 11, 2006; Posted: 11:13 a.m. EDT (15:13 GMT) Sen. Leahy, D-Vermont, wants hearings on the phone records database. WASHINGTON (AP) -- Congressional Democrats demanded answers from the Bush administration Thursday about a report that the government secretly collected records of ordinary Americans' phone calls to build a database of every call made within the country. " It is our government, it's not one party's government. It's America's government. Those entrusted with great power have a duty to answer to Americans what they are doing, " said Sen. Leahy of Vermont, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee. AT & T, Verizon and BellSouth telephone companies began turning over records of tens of millions of their customers' phone calls to the National Security Agency program shortly after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, USA Today reported, citing anonymous sources it said had direct knowledge of the arrangement. The telephone companies on Thursday declined to comment on national security matters, and would say only that they are assisting government agencies in accordance with the law. " We have been in full compliance with the law and we are committed to our customers' privacy, " said Bob Varettoni, a spokesman for Verizon. The White House defended its overall eavesdropping program and said no domestic surveillance is conducted without court approval. " The intelligence activities undertaken by the United States government are lawful, necessary and required to protect Americans from terrorist attacks, " said Dana Perino, the deputy White House press secretary, who added that appropriate members of Congress have been briefed on intelligence activities. On Capitol Hill, Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pennsylvania, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he would call the phone companies to appear before the panel " to find out exactly what is going on. " Before the latest report, Specter said the committee " has been unable to perform our constitutional oversight responsibilities to determine the constitutionality of the program. " Leahy sounded incredulous about the latest report and railed against what he called a lack of congressional oversight. He argued that the media was doing the job of Congress. " Are you telling me that tens of millions of Americans are involved with al Qaeda? " Leahy asked. " These are tens of millions of Americans who are not suspected of anything ... Where does it stop? " The Democrat, who at one point held up a copy of the newspaper, added: " Somebody ought to tell the truth and answer questions. They haven't. The press has done our work for us and we should be ashamed. Shame on us for being so far behind and being so willing to rubber stamp anything this administration does. We ought to fold our tents. " Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Illinois, said bringing the telephone companies before the Judiciary Committee is an important step. " We need more. We need to take this seriously, more seriously than some other matters that might come before the committee because our privacy as American citizens is at stake, " Durbin said. The program does not involve listening to or taping the calls. Instead it documents who talks to whom in personal and business calls, whether local or long distance, by tracking which numbers are called, the newspaper said. The NSA and the Office of National Intelligence Director did not immediately respond to requests for comment. NSA is the same spy agency that conducts the controversial domestic eavesdropping program that has been acknowledged by President Bush. The president said last year that he authorized the NSA to listen, without warrants, to international phone calls involving Americans suspected of terrorist links. Hayden's Capitol Hill visits canceled The report came as the former NSA director, Gen. Hayden -- Bush's choice to take over leadership of the CIA -- had been scheduled to visit lawmakers on Capitol Hill. However, the meetings with Republican Sens. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania and Murkowski of Alaska were postponed at the request of the White House, congressional aides in the two Senate offices said. The White House offered no reason for the postponement to the lawmakers. Other meetings with lawmakers were still planned. Hayden faced criticism because of the NSA's secret domestic eavesdropping program. As head of the NSA from March 1999 to April 2005, Hayden also would have overseen the call-tracking program. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California, who has spoken favorably of the nomination, said the latest revelation " is also going to present a growing impediment to the confirmation of Gen. Hayden. " The NSA wants the database of domestic call records to look for any patterns that might suggest terrorist activity, USA Today said. Don Weber, a senior spokesman for the NSA, told the paper that the agency operates within the law, but would not comment further on its operations. One big telecommunications company, Qwest, has refused to turn over records to the program, the newspaper said, because of privacy and legal concerns. Inquiry into eavesdropping killed Meanwhile, the Justice Department has abruptly ended an inquiry into the warrantless eavesdropping program because the NSA refused to grant its lawyers the necessary security clearance. (Full story) The Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility, or OPR, sent a fax to Rep. Maurice Hinchey, D-New York, on Wednesday saying they were closing their inquiry because without clearance their lawyers cannot examine Justice lawyers' role in the program. Justice Department spokesman Roehrkasse said the terrorist surveillance program " has been subject to extensive oversight both in the executive branch and in Congress from the time of its inception. " Roehrkasse noted the OPR's mission is not to investigate possible wrongdoing in other agencies, but to determine if Justice Department lawyers violated any ethical rules. He declined to comment when asked if the end of the inquiry meant the agency believed its lawyers had handled the wiretapping matter ethically. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.