Re: Trevor Marshall, Ph.D and Vitamin D study

[Guest guest]

Sorry I screwed that post. Here’s what I meant to say:

I assume you mean the study which suggests that Vit D supplementation is not a good idea, which was posted here in post # 26851.

He seems to be a genuine researcher from a quick “google” search. I also checked “Quackwatch” and didn’t see him listed.

OTOH, that does not mean that one study out of hundreds about Vit D is the one that counts. We’ll have to see if future researchers agree with him.

From: Francesca Skelton <fskelton@...>

Reply-< >

Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:38:59 -0500

support group < >

Conversation: [ ] Trevor Marshall, Ph.D and Vitamin D study

Subject: Re: [ ] Trevor Marshall, Ph.D and Vitamin D study

I assume you mean the study which suggests that Vit D supplementation which was posted here in post # 26851.

He seems to be a genuine researcher from a quick “google”. I also checked “Quackwatch’ and didn’t see him listed.

OTOH, that does not mean that one study out of hundreds about Vit D is the one that counts. We’ll have to see if future researchers agree with him.

From: radioreceiver2003 <radioreceiver2003@...>

Reply-< >

Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:23:09 -0000

< >

Subject: [ ] Trevor Marshall, Ph.D and Vitamin D study

The author of the Vitamin D study is Trevor Marshall, whose credentials

have been questioned by many commentators. Dr. Marshall says that he

has a PHD in bio-medicine but many in various internet forums think his

PHD is in electrical engineering. Others call him a quack.