Guest guest Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 Hi Adam: Welcome. If you cannot find the food at CRON-o-Meter then it is not in the USDA database. So it is unlikely you will find it anywhere. But try Google searches just in case someone somewhere, who does not have authorization to add data to the database, has the numbers you are looking for. As an alternative you could enter a food you figure is about the same. For example is there something similar enough to hemp seeds? Sesame seeds perhaps? Incidentally, why would you be eating these weird things? ; ^ ))) As for balancing intakes, I have just got used to the fact that there are a few nutrients I am almost always deficient, and I supplement them up to the RDA. Just one pill of each deficient nutrient a week is usually plenty in my case. Calcium and vitamin D are exceptions, which I need to get in some form more often. Hope this helps. Rodney. >> how do I find out the nutritional content of food source that > aren't already on the list. (like hemp seeds, bee pollen, > Chlorella, or even spelt bread.)> > Also what software would you suggest for what Dr Walford calls "bin packing", suggesting a food to make up for deficiencies? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 I would write to the manufacturer to request the full nutritional analysis. They either have it or can have it done by a lab. > > I am just starting my adventure in CR diet. I read Dr Waldford's book. To start I am just > tracking what I currently eat using the CRON O Meter. Great software but how do I find out > the nutritional content of food source that aren't already on the list. (like hemp seeds, bee > pollen, Chlorella, or even spelt bread.) > > Also what software would you suggest to do what Dr Waldford calls " bin packing " , > suggesting a food to make up for deficiencies. His is software is not currently available on > his website and it does not seem to run on windows XP or mac which is what I have available. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 31, 2008 Report Share Posted May 31, 2008 Francesca Skelton wrote: > I would ask you the same question. Products such as you mentioned are designed to make someone (else) wealthy, not to make you healthy :-)) Don¹t fall for the nonsensical claims they make. > Rodney aksed, Incidentally, why would you be eating these weird things? ; ^ ))) I'm surprised smart people like yourselves aren't better informed. To answer the above questions... Let's start with Chlorella. Chlorella is a widely researched algae. It contains Moisture: 3.6% Protein: 60.5% Fat: 11.0% Carbohydrate: 20.1% Fiber: 0.2% Ash: 4.6% Calories: 421/100 g Vitamins and Minerals Vitamin A activity: 55,500.0 IU/100g B-carotene: 180.8 mg/100g Chlorophyll a 1,469.0mg /100g Chlorophyll b 613.0 mg/100g Thiamine (vitamin B-1) 1.5mg/100g Riboflavin (vitamin B-2) 4.8 mg/100g Pyridoxine (vitamin B-6) 1.7 mg/100g Vitamin B-12 125.9 mcg/100g Vitamin C 15.6 mg/100g Vitamin E 1.0 IU/100g Niacin 23.8 mg/100g/TD> Pantothenic acid 1.3 mg/100g Folic acid 26.9 mcg/100g Biotin 191.6 mcg/100g PABA 0.6 mg/100g Inositol 165.0 mg/100g Calcium 203.0 mg/100g Phosphorus 989.0 mg/100g Iodine 600.0 mcg/100g Magnesium 315.0 mg/100g Iron 167.0mg/100g Zinc 71.0 mg/100g Copper 0.08 mg/100g Fatty Acids Unsaturated fatty acids 81.8% Saturated fatty acids 18.2% C14:0 0.6% C14:1 0.9% C14:2 0.9% C16:0 15.6% C16:1 9.1% C16:2 5.5% C16:3 17.1% C18:0 2.0% C18:1 10.0% C18:2 15.5% C18:3 22.8% Amino Acids Lysine 3.46 Cystine: 0.38 Histidine 1.29 Valine 3.64 Arginine 3.64 Methionine 1.45 Aspartic acid 5.20 Isoleucine 2.63 Threonine 2.70 Leucine 5.26 Serine 2.78 Tyrosine 2.09 Glutamic acid 6.29 Phenylalanine 3.08 Proline 2.93 Ornithine 0.06 Glycine 3.40 Tryptophan 0.59 Alanine 4.80 For those of you that need studies you can find that it is a great source of vitamin B12 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12656203 Another study that examines it's nutritional profile can be found here http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL & _udi=B6T4D-3RH6WPV-X & _user=1\ 0 & _rdoc=1 & _fmt= & _orig=search & _sort=d & view=c & _acct=C000050221 & _version=1 & _urlVers\ ion=0 & _userid=10 & md5=60084b8448dd1cb7f591e7ba1ef2ec11 Does it affect longevity? If cleansing the body of heavy metals and dioxins will increase longevity than chlorella will increase longevity. The research on chlorella's ability to bind and safely remove metals from the body with out damaging the kidneys is voluminous and proven. Here is just one artical on mercury removal http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/routledg/cjne/2001/00000011/00000001/art00\ 006 Here is one showing chlorella removes dioxins from breast milk http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17472477?ordinalpos=1 & itool=EntrezSystem2.PEn\ trez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum Here is one on chlorella reducing hypertension http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17330510?ordinalpos=1 & itool=EntrezSystem2.PEn\ trez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum This one shows A hot water extract of Chlorella pyrenoidosa reduces body weight and serum lipids in ovariectomized rats http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/107632123/abstract?CRETRY=1 & SRETRY=0 And do understand CR diet is in part about lowering body weight. The list goes on... As For Spelt Bread... It is no secret that many people have wheat allergies, I am not sure if you need a pub med article for proof or if you will simply take my clinical experience as proof. If you need proof here is one article http://www.co-allergy.com/pt/re/coallergy/abstract.00130832-200306000-00009.htm;\ jsessionid=LQySf6MM2Tx7jvGRvx2pw71s00Gs1yNQxJzR03vNXx6mvFb5WGq1!1750372989!18119\ 5628!8091!-1 Spelt grain happens to be a good wheat alternative for many. Avoiding allergens will reduce inflammatory response of the body, and while I have not looked for a scientific paper to prove it, common sense dictates that a body that is not having an allergic response to it's food sources will have increased health and well being. Bee pollen... At $5-$10 a pound depending how it's purchased it's hardly an attempt to take my money. It's one of the cheapest supplements I buy. It's not for everyone as some people have allergies to it. I do not. Many sources say it has no known therapeutic affect but I do not take take it for a therapeutic affect I take it for it's density of b vitamins, flavanoids, (anti-oxidants) and trace minerals. Will antioxidants help me live longer? You have read Dr W's book... who knows really but this study says it's high in antioxidants " Thus, the prepared extracts of bee-collected flower pollen may be regarded as effective natural and functional dietary food supplement due to their remarkable content of polyphenol substances and significant radical scavenging capacity with special regard to their nutritional–physiological implications and their health promoting effect. " http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL & _udi=B6W6D-43HSVXH-3 & _user=1\ 0 & _rdoc=1 & _fmt= & _orig=search & _sort=d & view=c & _acct=C000050221 & _version=1 & _urlVers\ ion=0 & _userid=10 & md5=facfa4de5430a2a5eb5cfd1eb20c550a flavonoids this one discusses the specific flavonoids found in bee pollen " Bee pollen is a mix of bee-collected floral pollens which varies widely in composition. Investigation of pollen collected by the stingless bee Scaptotrigona bipunctata yielded four flavonoid aglycones: myricetin, dihydromyricetin, quercetin and isorhamnetin. The structures were established from spectroscopic data (NMR) of the natural substances. " http://www.sbfgnosia.org.br/admin/pages/revista/artigo/arquivos/421-2003_40_41.p\ df And finally this study Influence of diet supplemented with mixed bee -pollen on rat health Auteur(s) / Author(s) FARAG Radwan S. ; GAAFAR Ahmed M. ; ARAFA Sahar A. ; showed " The basal diet supplemented with mixed bee-pollen induced a lowering lipid effect, increased HDL-cholesterol, progesterone, calcium levels, and the fertility of the elderly female rats. " So, I am attempting to have optimal nutrition. And I do not believe eating such things are weird at all. Sincerely, Adam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2008 Report Share Posted June 2, 2008 , If you mean that the numbers are misleading because they are not given per serving then I see what you mean. But they are not claiming to recommend a serving sizes, nor have I ever heard anyone imply that one should try derive their total nutrient intake for the day from chlorella, it is as the word implies a dietary supplement. However, on your suggestion, I went through the trouble of doing a cost analysis of the nutrients in chlorella. I was surprised myself to find that chlorella was in line with other foods I compared it to. It was cheaper for some nutrients and more expensive for others. At $300 per mg of copper I would not recommend it as a cost effective way to get copper, but a 6.25 per mg of B2 it's better than a lot of foods. So let me correct your statement, chlorella is relatively expensive per gram (net weight) compared to other foods but is not relatively expensive when one compares the cost per unit of nutrient. I purchased 250 g of chlorella for $75 ($30/100 grams) I compared that to foods I enjoy eating based on the dietary info from the CRON-O-Meter. Wild Chinook Salmon, fresh, cooked dry heat. at $25 per pound or $5.5/ 100gram (Todays price at my local fish store) Asparagus, cooked, organic about $10 per pound $2.2/ 100 gram Apples, raw, organic $2.5 per pound or $0.55/ 100 gram Here is a sample of what I calculated, I can send my whole spread sheet if you want. Vit A. per IU $0.001 Chlorella $0.002 Asparagus $0.010 Apples $0.011 Salmon Vit B6 per Mg $17.64 Chlorella $22.04 Asparagus none in apples $11 salmon Vit B12 per microgram $0.23 chlorella $1.89 Salmon Calcium per mg $0.14 chlorella $0.09 Asparagus $0.09 apples $0.19 salmon Magnesium per mg $0.09 chlorella $0.15 Asparagus $0.11 apples $0.04 salmon BTY the article you referred to about B12 in chlorella was interesting and educational (thank you for the reference) but it states plainly in the conclusion that the results were inconclusive and further study would need to be done to see it is a valid source of B12 or not. All I have to go on is the nutritional values that has been published on chlorella, (and for that matter all the other foods). If a credible source says this information is wrong let's get the correct info out there. But if the nutritional content is not being questioned then it is good a source of nutrition. As for spelt... I referred to wheat allergy, not gluten allergy. They are not the same thing. Many people react to wheat but can eat other grains/foods that have gluten but no wheat. Spelt is nice alternative for those people as it is the most similar to wheat when baked in taste and texture (compared to other alternative grains) and doesn't cost much more. I don't know if you have ever tried rice or corn baked goods, but I have, and they are not what I would consider to be yummy In regard to bee pollen I stated that it is not for everyone. Most of the studies which you cited are about the negative reactions a few people have to it. Many people have also had negative reactions to nuts, some have even died, that doesn't make nuts a bad food. And as Francesca stated in another post " Studies of large numbers of subjects are needed to be able to assess any true benefits. " or in this case negative affects. Incidentally, one of the other article you referenced was a 1978 article saying that bee pollen doesn't enhance sports performance. I did not understand the relevance of that article in this discussion? I was asked " why would I eat such a food? " The answer is because it is dense and well rounded in nutrition and has antioxidants. That is my understanding of what a low calorie optimal nutrition diet is about? There is no question that CRON can be practiced without these foods. One can also do CRON without eating liver, but that doesn't take away from the fact that liver is an excellent source of nutrients. Yes, I agree that some people hype these foods and make false claims about them but that doesn't change their nutritional value. It seems they meet CRON criteria based on amount on nutrient per calorie. As for being expensive, that's relative to income and perceived value. BUT, please if I am being hoodwinked and someone knows that these foods do not contain the nutrients they claim to contain then please put up a post so we can all be better informed. Sincerely, Adam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2008 Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 Jeff, I'm not sure on the technical definition of " food " but as far as I know ginger, nori (seaweed), sugar, and Mc's french fries (and I could list hundreds of others) are considered foods, but they would not " sustain life and provide the needed energy and nutrients/substance. " No one is discussing mono-dieting, especially not on a supplement. The reason chlorella is considered to be a food is because it is an edible algea that grows in nature. It is not fabricated in a laboratory like most vitamins that we buy. It is, as you say, a supplement, but it's a " whole food supplement " I used to get low-grade headaches that interfered with my ability to think. Someone suggested it may be an allergy. I did an allergy elimination diet and found out that I reacted to wheat. I switched to spelt and rye and the symptoms went away. When I would eat wheat the symptoms would return. No peer-reviewed double-blind study, or allergist's opinion can change my experience. I understand clearly that you believe " These are novelties at best and unlike real foods, are expensive and unnecessary " but that is opinion, not science. Adam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2008 Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 Francesca, I'm not sure why the source that I learned about chlorella from has any bearing, but since you are interested, it was originally from Dietrich Klinghardt, MD, PhD. I have learned more about it from other books, including Healing With Whole Foods: Oriental Traditions and Modern Nutrition: by Pitchford and various other sources. In case you're wondering, and since you brought up his name in another post, I started using chlorella before I knew that Dr. Mercola existed. I have no idea where first heard of bee pollen. Hope that helps you and good luck improving your health. sincerely, Adam > > Hello Adam: I notice my query below has gone unanswered. And although JR > doesn¹t care where you first heard about these supplements, I (and perhaps > others) would be interested. I am always searching for new/better ways to > improve my health and if I could be convinced, might add these items to my > regimen. > > You can respond off-list if you¹d rather. Of course no response is also ³a > response². > > Thanks in advance. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 5, 2008 Report Share Posted June 5, 2008 Dr. Pritiken sells food (not cheap mind you) books, cd's and sessions at his institute. Dr walford sells books and software. By your own criterea they are no longer credible sources. At least we still have Dr. Ornish. Cheers, Adam > > > > Hello Adam: I notice my query below has gone unanswered. And > although JR > > doesn¹t care where you first heard about these supplements, I (and > perhaps > > others) would be interested. I am always searching for new/better > ways to > > improve my health and if I could be convinced, might add these items > to my > > regimen. > > > > You can respond off-list if you¹d rather. Of course no response is > also ³a > > response². > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.