Check this out ...

[Guest guest]

I found this on another site but I liked it. This is from a guy in

the UK. I figured he wouldn't mind me sharing it considering the

last line of the letter (letters).

------------------------------------------------------------------

To Elliman & co, ie

Elliman, Helen Bedford, Hamilton, Abinun,

J Cant, Chisholm, Natasha Crowcroft, E Graham Davies,

Carol Dezateux, Adam Finn, bel Foot, Goldblatt,

Hall, Harnden, Heath, Nik , Sally E Kinsey,

Simon Kroll, Stuart Logan, Neil McIntosh, Moxon, Angus

Nicoll, Vas Novelli, Pollard, Ramsay, ,

Roderick Skinner, Brent

I arrived at the Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children with my

vaccine-injured son on Wednesday July 12 at 10.30. In the foyer I

turned left into the old building and took the lift to the seventh

floor. Somebody asked us where we were going. I replied that I was

going to see Elliman. The response was interesting: " I asked

because we rarely see children in this building. "

On the seventh floor there is a door with a hand-written note on it

that says " do not lock this door " . It was locked of course. However,

it was opened when I rang the bell. I asked to see Elliman. I

was told that you were out and that you were probably at one of your

innumerable meetings: " We find it hard to keep up with him. " I

agreed. You are not easy to find. However, I left a collection of

feathers: white, black and grey in your in-tray and then left. I

shall deliver the next load of feathers to you on Wednesday August

16 at 10.30.

No wonder you support vaccines. You have a nice office (and a nice

salary) in a nice part of the building where children (especially

those nasty, smelly, embarrassing, vaccine-injured children) never

go and you spend all your time in meetings, presumably discussing

whom you are going to vaccinate next and with which vaccines and

what your cut will be.

Once again I accuse you and your co-signatory cronies of being

cowards, hypocrites and liars who do not even believe their own

propaganda. The same goes for Montgomery. He advocates

compulsory vaccination

http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/extract/332/7551/1176-f

but won't take the vaccine challenge

http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/330/7483/112-d#93670

He wants a debate:

" Dear Alan,

We would very much welcome your contribution to the debate, details

of how to make such a contribution are at

http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/go/print/ourwork/publichealth/page_8

11.html

"

Of course he wants a debate or a contribution. A nice safe debate

with the contributions from the families of those killed or crippled

by vaccines dumped in the bin. has no intention of risking

his neck either, but has no problem killing and crippling a few

babies for the good of the cause, it would seem,

When are you going to roll up your sleeves? Show us, the families of

those children damaged by vaccines, that you believe what you say.

Expose yourselves to this acceptable or non-existent risk. Let me

vaccinate you.

Alan Rees

It is now Monday July 10

You have still not responded to the vaccine challenge (below) that

has once again been offered to you. Further proof surely, as if

further proof were needed, of your collective hypocrisy and

cowardice.

Therefore, on Wednesday July 12 at 10.30, I am going to arrive at

the Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children with my vaccine-

injured son. A white feather is the traditional symbol of cowardice.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_feather

I am therefore going to present you with white feathers. I am also

going to start a new tradition and present you with black feathers

to symbolize not only cowardice, but cowardliness and hypocrisy

combined with evil. Other parents of vaccine-injured children are

invited to follow my example and the media to monitor the

proceedings.

It is also a century since the Dreyfus affair was concluded with the

exoneration of Captain Alfred Dreyfus.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreyfus_Affair

The harassment that Dr Wakefield has endured is strongly reminiscent

of the treatment meted out to Dreyfus. Wakefield is a rare being

nowadays: a real doctor who actually listens to his patients, takes

a case history, examines them, and tries to help them - unlike the

scum in serried ranks arrayed against him. This must be the first

time in history that there are doctors who make a virtue of not

examining patients, not listening to them and studiously ignoring

them. No wonder Wakefield incurs the hatred and envy of incompetent

quacks and lesser men. Wakefield will soon be exonerated, but so far

nobody has publicly accused Wakefield's enemies as Emile Zola

accused those who tormented Dreyfus.

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%27accuse

Surely it is time to emulate Zola.

If you are all active pro-vaccinators: j'accuse!

I accuse you all of cowardice and hypocrisy.

I accuse you all of bully-boy tactics.

I accuse you all of injecting babies with carcinogens.

I accuse you all of injecting babies with toxins.

I accuse you all of injecting babies with allergens.

I accuse you all of injecting babies with heavy metals.

I accuse you all of killing and injuring healthy babies for money.

I accuse you all of quackery.

See you at 10.30 on Wednesday July 12 at Great Ormond Street.

Alan Rees

Original letter sent Thursday July 6:

As the parent of a vaccine-injured child who is taking legal action

on his behalf, I am responding to your " Dear Sir/Madam " letter. This

is to let you know that no line is going to be drawn under anything.

Autistic children are entitled to compensation.

Among other things I shall be showing the court how vaccines are

routinely used in the laboratory to cause brain damage in rats (I am

appending a couple of examples). I may also refer the court to the

work of Mady Hornig, for example. I am sure you know that she used

vaccines to induce autism-like behaviour in rats. Not that you think

that proves anything, apparently. The judges might think otherwise.

I shall also point out that Wakefield and others have found patented

vaccine virus in the guts and cs fluid of autistic children. You say

you're not convinced. Let's see if the judges are.

I shall also be pointing out that however harmless pro-vaccinators

say that vaccines are, and however much they scoff at the evidence

of vaccine damage, it is all words: nobody is willing to prove that

they mean what they say. Some time ago I issued the vaccine

challenge in the BMJ, offering to vaccinate pro-vaccinators with the

childhood vaccines dose-adjusted for body weight:

http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/330/7483/112-d#93670

Not one of you has so far been willing to come forward and roll your

sleeves up. I still have no takers, except for the hilarious reply

from Hawes, whose wonderful " acceptance " has a whole load of

delightful conditions attached:

http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/330/7483/112-d#94081

Here is another opportunity for you to show that you really do mean

what you say and are willing to set a good example and demonstrate

that vaccines are safe or that the risk is " acceptable " . There is a

great deal of interest in my case. Failure to accept this offer will

mean that your names will be added to the list I shall present to

the media of those refusing the challenge. You are likely to be

regarded as cowards and hypocrites who are scared of your own

medicine and who are unwilling to take the risk you expect every

child to run. Talk is cheap. Let's see some action.

This message is being copied to people with vaccine-injured

children, media representatives and others with a personal interest

in the subject, so you should use the reply-all function

Alan Rees