Re: protesting at vaccine hearings; oops

[Guest guest]

When I first posted that we should protest, I mistakenly thought that the issue had been decided. I did not understand that he had yet to rule. Of course it goes without saying that we should wait for the ruling. I would like to think that at least one unelected official in government has the courage to do the right thing -- well, I acknowledge that there are a few others, but I would be surprised if there are 10. On the other hand we have hundreds if not thousands of corrupt govt health officials at the CDC, etc who are no less than evil and who are now actively trying to butcher people to cover up their bureaucratic blunders.HC <stratpat@...> wrote: We know congress is corrupt and self-serving, especially on this issue. We know the administration functions on this issue in much the same way, if not worse. We also know the federal agencies, as well as a number of medical institutions, are corrupt and self-serving. That is what they do best. They appeal to their own/special interests. The Courts, the last vestige of hope for this group to address this issue in a sane, just fashion, should be given an opportunity to play out, following the rules of the Court and of the appropriate administrative agencies. We need to show the statesman(woman)ship that they have

refused to show throughout this debacle. As they corrupt this issue, we must stand incorruptible. As they lie more and more, we must be fastidious with the truth. As they move to poison babies to protect their arguments and their futures, we must move to save the future of those who have yet to be damaged for the future of this society. As they intentionally hide information about the potential dangers which exist (for example, in the flu vaccine), we must try to reach those who wish to make an informed decision with accurate information. And in this Court decision, we must give them every opportunity to do the right thing. Until we know they simply are incapable of addressing this issue. You see, unlike them, I believe that everyone should be given a fair opportunity to come clean or to hang themselves. Re: protesting at vaccine hearings I would strongly echo these remarks. I suspect

Hastings may be open to the idea that the hearing should be open to the public- in any case he has not ruled on this.I will keep this list up to date on developments.Bob K.On Nov 17, 2006, at 4:12 PM, olerist wrote:> Of course anybody can do as they wish, but...>> Potentially pissing off the court and possibly reinforcing the> DOJ/Pharmica point (directly or indirectly) that security is a> concern, I do not think is a good idea.>> The request of sealing the records 3 years ago (almost to the day) was> rejected. There is still a chance that Hastings may rule fairly on> this issue.>> J. KrakowAttorney At Law2001 Marcus Avenue, Suite N125Lake Success, New York 11042(516) 354-3300(646) 349-1771 (fax)(212) 227-0600 (NYC telephone)