Guest guest Posted April 17, 2009 Report Share Posted April 17, 2009 Hi folks: Here is an issue we might benefit from discussing. There is an obvious need for calcium in the diet, whether from food or supplements. But it is far from clear to me what the optimal calcium intake might be. It is probably fair to say that all the metallic essential nutrients (calcium, sodium, iron, selenium, etc.) are harmful in excess, and that is certainly true of calcium, where calcification of the arteries is one risk of excessive intake. But the paper recently posted here as showing a dramatic reduction in new cases of cancer among post-menopausal females supplemented with vitamin D were also supplemented with a sizeable amount of calcium. Indeed, in that study there was a subject group that was supplemented with calcium only, and they too enjoyed a sizeable reduction in cancer diagnoses. So certainly it seems that we need more calcium than the average person is getting (otherwise those supplemented with it would not have had fewer cancer diagnoses). The subjects were given 1400 to 1500 mg of calcium daily. So their total calcium intake was probably around 2000 mg. Can anyone here provide a good rationale for an optimal intake of this nutrient? I am currently supplementing 500 mg/day. I am thinking that this may be less than optimal. Rodney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.