Guest guest Posted April 16, 2010 Report Share Posted April 16, 2010 Encouraging to me because all I expect from CRON is a longer " healthspan " , a longer lifespan would be wonderful a surprising result! Perhaps A Longer Lifespan, Certainly A Longer 'Healthspan' 16 Apr 2010 Organisms from yeast to rodents to humans all benefit from cutting calories. In less complex organisms, restricting calories can double or even triple lifespan. It's not yet clear just how much longer calorie restriction might help humans live, but those who practice the strict diet hope to survive past 100 years old. In a review article in the April 16 edition of Science, nutrition and longevity researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, University College in London and the Andrus Gerontology Center at the University of Southern California, report that calorie restriction influences the same handful of molecular pathways related to aging in all the animals that have been studied. Aware of the profound influence of calorie restriction on animals, some people have cut their calorie intake by 25 percent or more in hopes of lengthening lifespan. But first author Luigi Fontana, MD, PhD, is less interested in calorie restriction for longer life than in its ability to promote good health throughout life. " The focus of my research is not really to extend lifespan to 120 or 130 years, " says Fontana, research associate professor of medicine at Washington University and an investigator at the Istituto Superiore di Sanità in Rome, Italy. " Right now, the average lifespan in Western countries is about 80, but there are too many people who are only healthy until about age 50. We want to use the discoveries about calorie restriction and other related genetic or pharmacological interventions to close that 30-year gap between lifespan and 'healthspan.' However, by extending healthy lifespan, average lifespan also could increase up to 100 years of age. " Fontana and his co-authors write about how cutting calorie intake between 10 percent and 50 percent decreases the activity of pathways involving insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1), glucose and TOR (target of rapamycin), and considerably increases lifespan in animals.Genetic mutations involved in those pathways have the same effect. Those animals have far fewer problems with diseases related to aging, such as cancer, cardiovascular disease and cognitive problems. " About 30 percent of the animals on calorie restriction die at an advanced age without any diseases normally related to aging, " Fontana says. " In contrast, among animals on a standard diet, the great majority (94 percent) develop and die of one or more chronic diseases such as cancer or heart disease. In 30 percent to 50 percent of the animals on calorie restriction, or with genetic mutations in these aging-related pathways, healthspan is equal to lifespan. They eventually die, but they don't get sick. " Unfortunately, many humans are moving in the opposite direction. As obesity reaches epidemic rates in Western countries, Fontana says rather than closing the 30-year gap between healthspan and lifespan, the gap is likely to grow. It's even possible lifespan may decrease as people develop preventable diseases such as atherosclerosis, type 2 diabetes and certain forms of cancer. Those growing rates of obesity are a reason some scientists think calorie restriction will never catch on, regardless of its potential benefits. But, Fontana says, if researchers who study nutrition and aging can understand how calorie restriction lengthens life and makes people healthier, it may be possible to develop less drastic interventions or medicines that influence pathways affected by calorie restriction and help keep people healthy as they get older. Among people now practicing calorie restriction, he says side effects include reduced libido because calorie restriction reduces testosterone levels. They also tend to become cold more quickly because their thermal regulation changes as their metabolism slows and their core body temperature drops. Fontana says as calorie restriction research advances on many fronts, it's becoming clear that dietary advice once based on epidemiological data now makes sense from a molecular point of view. In the past, dietitians might recommend more fruits and vegetables or less meat and more whole grains. They based that advice on studies showing people who ate more vegetables or fewer animal products tended to have less cardiovascular disease. " Now we have moved from epidemiology to molecular biology, " he says. " We know that certain nutrients, as well as lower calorie intake, can influence IGF-1 and other pathways. Soon we hope to be able to use that knowledge to help people live longer and healthier lives. Fontana L, Partridge L, Longo VD. Extending healthy life span from yeast to humans, Science, vol. 328 (5976) April 16, 2010. Manuscript Number: Science.1172539 Washington University School of Medicine's 2,100 employed and volunteer faculty physicians also are the medical staff of -Jewish and St. Louis Children's hospitals. The School of Medicine is one of the leading medical research, teaching and patient care institutions in the nation, currently ranked third in the nation by U.S. News & World Report. Through its affiliations with -Jewish and St. Louis Children's hospitals, the School of Medicine is linked to BJC HealthCare. Source: Washington University in St. Louis Article URL: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/185631.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 16, 2010 Report Share Posted April 16, 2010 Hi folks: On this topic, the following may - or maybe may not - make sense. When I look at the deaths announcements for my contemporaries at school and university, I think I may see a pattern emerging. Of course this is thoroughly unscientific but perhaps with time it may be shown to be about accurate ..... or otherwise. The people I knew who I now see dying early seem to be predominantly, although not exclusively, those who, at around age 20, were unusually slim, or unusually large. Interestingly, even the slim ones who were strong and athletic seem to be dying early. And also even those who were large but very strong and muscular also seem to be over-represented in the data. So it seems it is not just non-athletic overweight people or weak anaemic-looking people who are dying early. In my very small unscientic sample, smallness or largeness in any manifestation seems to have been a problem. Of particular interest to me are a couple of cases of people who were big, very strong and athletic 'achievers'. In one case in particular I was very familiar with his eating habits. I know they were very similar to mine at the time, as we often ate meals together. At every meal we would eat huge amounts of food - I will not bother you with the details, although I very well remember them. My guess is that he did not change his eating habits when he was no longer involved in extensive athletic training. Fortunately, I did. Now this leads to some possible conclusions. If I had continued to eat as much as I felt like eating - with no restraint - after stopping athletic activities I might logically have experienced a lifespan somewhat similar to his. He died aged 65. I have measured how much I currently would like to eat, without restraint. And I know how many calories I do eat - which is about 42% less than that. So, if I make the conclusion that I also would have died at age 65 if I had continued to eat whatever I liked, and if I am actually eating 42% less than that, then, POSSIBLY, my lifespan might be 65 x 1.42, which equals about 92 years. And, in line with the post to which this is a reply, remaining healthy perhaps up to age 90? One thing that may be significant about this is that, based on this logic, I do NOT come up with numbers over 100 based on 42% CR. FWIW WMNBM Rodney. > > Encouraging to me because all I expect from CRON is a longer " healthspan " , a longer lifespan would be wonderful a surprising result! > > > Perhaps A Longer Lifespan, Certainly A Longer 'Healthspan' > 16 Apr 2010 > > Organisms from yeast to rodents to humans all benefit from cutting calories. In less complex organisms, restricting calories can double or even triple lifespan. It's not yet clear just how much longer calorie restriction might help humans live, but those who practice the strict diet hope to survive past 100 years old. > > In a review article in the April 16 edition of Science, nutrition and longevity researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, University College in London and the Andrus Gerontology Center at the University of Southern California, report that calorie restriction influences the same handful of molecular pathways related to aging in all the animals that have been studied. > > Aware of the profound influence of calorie restriction on animals, some people have cut their calorie intake by 25 percent or more in hopes of lengthening lifespan. But first author Luigi Fontana, MD, PhD, is less interested in calorie restriction for longer life than in its ability to promote good health throughout life. > > " The focus of my research is not really to extend lifespan to 120 or 130 years, " says Fontana, research associate professor of medicine at Washington University and an investigator at the Istituto Superiore di Sanità in Rome, Italy. " Right now, the average lifespan in Western countries is about 80, but there are too many people who are only healthy until about age 50. We want to use the discoveries about calorie restriction and other related genetic or pharmacological interventions to close that 30-year gap between lifespan and 'healthspan.' However, by extending healthy lifespan, average lifespan also could increase up to 100 years of age. " > > Fontana and his co-authors write about how cutting calorie intake between 10 percent and 50 percent decreases the activity of pathways involving insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1), glucose and TOR (target of rapamycin), and considerably increases lifespan in animals.Genetic mutations involved in those pathways have the same effect. Those animals have far fewer problems with diseases related to aging, such as cancer, cardiovascular disease and cognitive problems. > > " About 30 percent of the animals on calorie restriction die at an advanced age without any diseases normally related to aging, " Fontana says. " In contrast, among animals on a standard diet, the great majority (94 percent) develop and die of one or more chronic diseases such as cancer or heart disease. In 30 percent to 50 percent of the animals on calorie restriction, or with genetic mutations in these aging-related pathways, healthspan is equal to lifespan. They eventually die, but they don't get sick. " > > Unfortunately, many humans are moving in the opposite direction. As obesity reaches epidemic rates in Western countries, Fontana says rather than closing the 30-year gap between healthspan and lifespan, the gap is likely to grow. It's even possible lifespan may decrease as people develop preventable diseases such as atherosclerosis, type 2 diabetes and certain forms of cancer. > > Those growing rates of obesity are a reason some scientists think calorie restriction will never catch on, regardless of its potential benefits. But, Fontana says, if researchers who study nutrition and aging can understand how calorie restriction lengthens life and makes people healthier, it may be possible to develop less drastic interventions or medicines that influence pathways affected by calorie restriction and help keep people healthy as they get older. > > Among people now practicing calorie restriction, he says side effects include reduced libido because calorie restriction reduces testosterone levels. They also tend to become cold more quickly because their thermal regulation changes as their metabolism slows and their core body temperature drops. > > Fontana says as calorie restriction research advances on many fronts, it's becoming clear that dietary advice once based on epidemiological data now makes sense from a molecular point of view. In the past, dietitians might recommend more fruits and vegetables or less meat and more whole grains. They based that advice on studies showing people who ate more vegetables or fewer animal products tended to have less cardiovascular disease. > > " Now we have moved from epidemiology to molecular biology, " he says. " We know that certain nutrients, as well as lower calorie intake, can influence IGF-1 and other pathways. Soon we hope to be able to use that knowledge to help people live longer and healthier lives. > > Fontana L, Partridge L, Longo VD. Extending healthy life span from yeast to humans, Science, vol. 328 (5976) April 16, 2010. Manuscript Number: Science.1172539 > > Washington University School of Medicine's 2,100 employed and volunteer faculty physicians also are the medical staff of -Jewish and St. Louis Children's hospitals. The School of Medicine is one of the leading medical research, teaching and patient care institutions in the nation, currently ranked third in the nation by U.S. News & World Report. Through its affiliations with -Jewish and St. Louis Children's hospitals, the School of Medicine is linked to BJC HealthCare. > > Source: Washington University in St. Louis > > Article URL: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/185631.php > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.