Guest guest Posted January 18, 2010 Report Share Posted January 18, 2010 s Hopkins Health Alert Can Vitamin D Prevent Arthritis? Comments (2) Many researchers now believe that the "sunshine vitamin" may one day play a key role in preventing the development and progression of arthritis. Researchers, including scientists at s Hopkins under the direction of Uzma Haque, M.D., Assistant Professor of Medicine in the Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology at s Hopkins, have been looking at the effect of vitamin D on rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis and the data are quite suggestive. Vitamin D is proving to be a most promising area for arthritis research. Vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin that's essential for human health. Vitamin D levels are assessed with a simple blood test that measures levels of 25-hydroxy vitamin D, or 25(OH)D, the metabolite that reflects vitamin D stores; results are expressed in terms of nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL). Although there is continuing debate over what constitutes an optimal level, most experts now agree that the level should be 30 ng/mL or higher. Yet most Americans -- up to 60% by some estimates -- have suboptimal blood levels of vitamin D. In part, that's because we spend less time outdoors and absorb less vitamin D from sunlight. However, it also may be because we don't get enough vitamin D from our diet. Only a few foods contain significant amounts of vitamin D. It has long been recognized that vitamin D is essential to bone health because it promotes calcium absorption. Vitamin D regulates as many as 1,000 different genes, including those that weed out precancerous cells and slow the runaway reproduction of cancer cells. Vitamin D also helps maintain a healthy immune system and activates cells that fight infection, including the bacterium that causes tuberculosis. During the past decade, there's been an explosion of research suggesting that vitamin D plays a significant role in joint health and that low levels may be a risk factor for rheumatologic conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Unlike other vitamins, vitamin D is not just a simple nutrient. It's also an active steroid hormone that binds to receptors in a host of vulnerable tissues -- including the joints affected by arthritis -- and works to keep these tissues healthy. Arthritis patients may be even more likely than the general population to have low levels of vitamin D. According to a study presented at the 2008 European Union League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) meeting in Paris, nearly 75% of patients who presented at a rheumatology clinic -- including those who were subsequently diagnosed with inflammatory joint diseases, soft-tissue rheumatism, uncomplicated musculoskeletal backache, or osteoporosis -- were deficient in vitamin D. If your D level is lower than 30 ng/mL, the parathyroid gland becomes overactive and sets in motion a process that depletes calcium from bones in order to maintain normal blood levels of calcium. This currently accepted optimal level of vitamin D is based solely on vitamin D's calcium function. However, it ignores other important functions. As we learn more about vitamin D, Dr. Haque anticipates that the optimal level will be pushed considerably higher, with an ideal range between 50 and 70 ng/mL. Posted in Arthritis on January 11, 2010 From: Francesca Skelton <fskelton@...>support group < >Sent: Sat, January 16, 2010 7:57:01 PMSubject: Re: [ ] Re: Preventable Causes of Death Hmmm. I’m reminded once again of Andre’s post (#28712) Or see: http://health. groups.. com/group/ / message/28712) and the subsequent short dialogue I had with you concerning the findings of that study. I felt like we weren’t really “connecting†when I mentioned blood glucose and you responded about methionine. Again I mention Dr Kenyon and her work on blood glucose and its relation to shorter or longer life. Of course her papers concern lower forms of life (unfotunately) . On 1/16/10 10:32 PM, "perspect1111" <perspect1111> wrote: Hi folks: More on this. At the time of my previous post I had not taken a look at the full text of the paper. Now I have. Quickly. It can be found at this address: http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/ pmc/articles/ PMC2667673/ ?tool=pubmed They actually listed twelve preventable risk factors. For some reason the article I read did not list all of them. Notably, high blood glucose, high LDL, low fruit and vegetable intake and low PUFA intake were also listed. Perhaps more notable ..... low vitamin D adequacy was NOT listed! Sigh! Based on what has been posted here in the past couple of years about vitamin D, it is conceivable that inadequate vitamin D status may account for more deaths than any of the other listed items! It is a pity they had not included it. Here is the full listing: 467,000 --- Tobacco 395,000 --- Blood pressure 216,000 --- Overweight 191,000 > > Hi folks: > > I was taking a snoop at Jeff Novick's Facebook page and came across an interesting post containing information I had not seen previously, quantifying annual deaths in the US from preventable causes. The numbers were based on data from 2005. > > In that year here are the number of deaths believed to have resulted from each of the following causes, out of 2.5 million total deaths: > > 467,000 --- Tobacco smoking. > 395,000 --- Hypertension. > 216,000 --- Excessive body weight. > 191,000 --- Inadequate exercise. > 102,000 --- Excessive salt intake. > 84,000 --- Low intake of beneficial fat from fish. > 82,000 --- Intake of trans fatty acids. > 64,000 --- Excessive alcohol intake. > > I found this interesting since only the body weight issue is directly related to CR. So this list provides, at least for me, a helpful overview of the things I really ought to be doing in addition to CR. On the question of alcohol, the study found that, at least for the population as a whole the well known benefits were outweighed by the disadvantages. > > Of course almost all of us here have long realized these are health issues. And no doubt have adapted our lives accordingly. But it is nice to see numbers attached to them to give some idea of their relative importance. For example, I had not realized the fish fats EPA and DHA to be as significant as this study has found. > > Source: > > "The preventable causes of death in the United States: comparative risk assessment of dietary, lifestyle, and metabolic risk factors." > > Danaei G, Ding EL, Mozaffarian D, B, Rehm J, Murray CJ, Ezzati M. > > PLoS Med. 2009 Apr 28;6(4):e1000058. Epub 2009 Apr 28. > > PMID: 19399161 > > [Thanks Jeff!] > > Rodney. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.