Guest guest Posted September 30, 2010 Report Share Posted September 30, 2010 > > http://abcnews.go.com/Health/WomensHealth/task-force-cites-stronger-bisphosp > honate-fracture-link/story?id= > I am suspicious of the cited study. They claim there is increased risk for a rare type of thigh (I assume they meant femur) fracture among people who take the drugs. But people who are taking the drugs are presumably at increased risk for bone fractures already. It is devilishly hard to factor this out. I confess I have not read the original paper but color me skeptical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2010 Report Share Posted September 30, 2010 The article was available as a pdf, so I've uploaded it to our Files section in a new folder for non-CRON related articles. You can find it here: /files/Misc/ Diane > >> > > >> > > >> http://abcnews.go.com/Health/WomensHealth/task-force-cites-stronger-bisphosp > >> > honate-fracture-link/story?id= > >> > > > I am suspicious of the cited study. They claim there is increased risk for a > > rare type of thigh (I assume they meant femur) fracture among people who take > > the drugs. But people who are taking the drugs are presumably at increased > > risk for bone fractures already. It is devilishly hard to factor this out. I > > confess I have not read the original paper but color me skeptical. > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2010 Report Share Posted September 30, 2010 I think it points to why we should require reading the scientific sources of studies and not the newspaper summaries. When a reporter summarizes a scientific work, accuracy is often sacrificed to make the story more sensational and thus more newsworthy. It's easy to quote one or two people who have experienced a very rare condition, but it makes the occurrence of the condition seem more common than it really is. Unfortunately, it's easier for an audience to relate to an anecdote than to a statistical probability, so people are going to pay attention to the anecdotes. To be really accurate, the reporter should also be quoting people who did *not* experience the condition in numbers corresponding to the probability of not getting it. That would certainly stop all the hysteria. Diane > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > >>>> > http://abcnews.go.com/Health/WomensHealth/task-force-cites-stronger-bisphosp > >>>>> > >> > honate-fracture-link/story?id= > >>>>> > >> > > >>> > > I am suspicious of the cited study. They claim there is increased risk > >>> for a > >>> > > rare type of thigh (I assume they meant femur) fracture among people who > >>> take > >>> > > the drugs. But people who are taking the drugs are presumably at > >>> increased > >>> > > risk for bone fractures already. It is devilishly hard to factor this > >>> out. I > >>> > > confess I have not read the original paper but color me skeptical. > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.