Guest guest Posted December 8, 2004 Report Share Posted December 8, 2004 Tom: The letter you posted from researchers skeptical of the results of natalizumab/Antegren/Tysabri is interesting, but I think the rebuttal from the folks who did the study is worth noting. I do think there is some reason for optimism with this treatment: The authors reply: Chaudhuri and Behan refer to an early exploratory study of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis. This was a study of 72 patients, of whom 37 were randomly assigned to receive two doses of natalizumab, one month apart (and 35 to receive placebo).1 There was a significant decrease in the number of new gadolinium-enhanced lesions on MRI during the 12 weeks after the first dose of natalizumab, as compared with placebo. Given the small size of the study and the limited duration of treatment, however, it is not surprising that no clinical benefit was observed. The positive MRI result did, however, provide us with a reason to undertake our six- month study. Although this study was powered only to investigate the effect of treatment on MRI activity, it showed a significant treatment-associated reduction in relapses. It is not surprising that there was no significant change in disability in either the treated groups or the placebo group over a six-month period. The mechanisms by which irreversible disability develops in multiple sclerosis are not well understood. Chaudhuri and Behan cite evidence supporting the independence of the progression of disability and relapses,2,3 but these events are not completely unrelated. Incomplete recovery from relapses is one mechanism of permanent disability. The effect of natalizumab on long-term progression of disability can be addressed only by larger, longer-term, phase 3 studies. Two such studies designed to investigate this issue are currently under way. In our article, we omitted acknowledgment of J. O'Riordan and J. Parratt (Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, United Kingdom), who were investigators in the trial, and Dr. , who provided helpful comments on the manuscript. H. , M.D. Institute of Neurology London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom d.miller@... W. O'Connor, M.D. University of Toronto Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada Editor's note: Dr. reports having received grant support from Elan, Schering, and Biogen; honorariums for giving expert advice to Biogen, Wyeth, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Schering; and lecture fees from Serono. Dr. O'Connor reports having received grant support from Elan, Biogen, Athena Neurosciences, Aventis, Berlex, Serono, Teva Neurosciences, Angiotech, and Amgen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.