Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Vaccine Companies Investigated for Manslaughter

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Vaccine Companies Investigated for Manslaughter A formal investigation has been launched by French authorities against two managers from drug companies GlaxoKline and Sanofi Pasteur. A second investigation for manslaughter has also been opened against Sanofi Pasteur MSD.The investigations are in response to allegations that the companies failed to fully disclose side effects from an anti-hepatitis B drug used between

1994 and 1998.During this time, close to two-thirds of the French population, and almost all newborn babies, received a hepatitis B vaccine. The vaccination campaign was halted after concerns rose over the shot’s side effects.Thirty plaintiffs, including the families of five people who died after the vaccination, have launched a civil action in the case against the drug companies. Sources: Reuters February 1, 2008 Dr. Mercola's Comments: In

the United States, the hepatitis B vaccine is recommended for all newborns before they are discharged from the hospital. These recommendations are inexcusable. It finally seems that the drug companies will be held responsible for the consequences of giving this dangerous vaccine to infants.Why it Makes No Sense to Give the Hepatitis B Vaccine to NewbornsFolks, let’s make on thing perfectly clear here, hepatitis B is VERY difficult to catch. You nearly always need to have blood or sexual contact of some sort with an infected carrier. That is why the main risk factors for hepatitis B are IV drug abusers and those who engage in sex with multiple partners. This, of course, makes it nearly impossible for a newborn to contract hepatitis B, unless his mother already has it.Further, vaccine-derived immunity is

thought to be short-lived, and between 30 percent to 50 percent of vaccinated individuals may lose their antibodies within seven years.Meanwhile, up to 60 percent of people who initially respond will lose detectable antibodies within 12 years. So that means that by the time these newborns get to the age when they could potentially engage in the risky behaviors that would put them at risk of hepatitis B, their childhood vaccine will provide little to no protection.The central nervous system of a newborn infant is also particularly susceptible to toxic influences. This is one of the reasons why the hepatitis B vaccine is such a problem. If it were given later in life, as is done in many other countries, it would not be as problematic.Even so, this vaccine is still associated with numerous side effects, such as an increased risk of multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid diseases. Do Your Homework Before Vaccinating: The Drug Companies Won’t do it For YouAside from highlighting the extreme lack of common sense that goes along with vaccinating a newborn against a disease they have a rare chance of getting until they’re much older, this article points out, once again, that the drug companies are not on your side.Their primary motivation is in making profits, and if that means covering up side effects to make you believe a vaccination is safe, they will likely do it.Remember, you do have the right to refuse vaccinations, and there are two basic axioms you should never forget. 1. Nobody, anywhere or any time and under

any circumstances has the right or power in this country to immunize you or your children against your will and conviction. If they attempt to do so, you can legally charge them with "assault with a deadly weapon" and have the full resources of the law behind you. 2. At all times in attempting to avoid unwanted immunization, you have the Law of the Land behind you. Those who would try to vaccinate you against your will are on very shaky ground. Into every compulsory immunization law in America are written legal exceptions and waivers, which are there specifically to protect you from the attempted tyranny of officialdom. It is not only your right, but your obligation to use them, if this is what your conscience tells you.While all 50 states have immunization requirements, 28 allow parents to opt out for medical or religious reasons. Another 20 states allow parents to opt out for personal or philosophical reasons as

well.My previous article, How to Avoid Unwanted Immunizations of All Kinds, lays out your opt-out steps in greater detail. There is also an entire chapter in my book Take Control of Your Health devoted to this very topic, including what you should know before vaccinating, and what to do if you decide not to. Related Articles: Childhood Vaccine Safety Studies are Largely 'Inadequate' The Truth Behind the Vaccine Coverup How America Was Blinded by Merck's Vaccine Lieshttp://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/2/23/vaccine-companies-investigated-for-manslaughter.aspx

Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Search.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>

> Great article!!!!!

Reuters has pick up the story claiming a " source " .

http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssHealthcareNews/idUSL017346712008020

1

French judges probe firms over vaccinations -source

Fri Feb 1, 2008 3:32am EST

PARIS, Jan 31 (Reuters) - French authorities have opened a formal

investigation into two managers from drugs groups GlaxoKline

(GSK.L: Quote, Profile, Research) and Sanofi Pasteur over a

vaccination campaign in the 1990s, a judicial source said late on

Thursday.

Judge Marie-Odile Bertella-Geffroy also opened an investigation for

manslaughter against Sanofi Pasteur MSD, a joint venture between

Sanofi Aventis (SASY.PA: Quote, Profile, Research) and Merck (MRK.N:

Quote, Profile, Research), the same source said.

The investigations follow allegations that the companies failed to

fully disclose side effects from an anti-hepatitis B drug used in a

vaccination campaign between 1994 and 1998.

There was no immediate comment from the companies or the two managers

involved.

From 1994 to 1998, almost two thirds of the French population and

almost all newborn babies were vaccinated against hepatitis B, but

the campaign was suspended after concerns arose about possible

secondary effects from the treatments.

Some 30 plaintiffs have launched a civil action in the case,

including the families of five people who died after vaccination.

(Reporting by Thierry Leveque; Writing by Mackenzie; Editing by

Holmes)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...