liposomal C complete emails to silverlist

[Guest guest]

" Bradley's Homemade Liposomal C Method "

Posted by: " ransley@... " ransley@... daddybob52954

Mon Aug 24, 2009 9:37 am (PDT)

What follows is all of Bradley's original posts on The Silverlist

about this...This has already been cross posted in many places and

apparently he wants this info to be spread far and wide.

If you are not familiar with this man, he works with a private research

foundation that has no internet presence that you will find by search

engine. They research various simple cheap and effective alternative medical

protocols then he releases the synopsis of their results to the Silverlist

from time to time, then he disappears again.

He is getting on in years and simply does not spend as much time on any

forum as much as he used to. Those of us who have watched him for years know

that he does not deal in hyperbole and is a master of understatement and

courtesy, so the almost breathless nature of the first post really caused a

stir.

DaddyBob

------------ -----

We are Euphoric...almost. ..over our enthusiasm regarding a substance which

became available about 24 months ago---and since subjected to a number of

different evaluations.

While the actual materials are not (essentially) modified in chemical or

biological essence..... the FORM of delivery is GREATLY improved and we have

enjoyed ASTONISHING results among all of our principal investigators

evaluating these materials. These research evaluations revolved around

substances yielded by a process called Liposomal Encapsulated Technology

(LET). All of our evaluations involved either Liposomal Encapsulated GSH or

Liposomal Encapsulated

Vitamin C. A majority of our experimental cases involved LET-based Vitamin

C.

About six months ago, inspired by the very recent (last 15 months)

documented research of Dr. Levy, M.D., and associates, we endeavored

to prosecute some evaluations of our own.......which centered on vitamin C

encapsulated by phospholipid liposomes. The actual material we utilized was

obtained from representatives of a firm holding some exclusive procedural

patents (Livon), but there are, probably, others now

available... ..especially with the proclivities of firms for circumventing

existing patents. The material is called " Smart " Lyco-Spheric Nano-Spheres.

The principal characteristic which enables the substance to yield such

outstanding results, springs from its ability to present both in the blood

stream and the inter-cellular environments- ---simultaneousl y. I could hardly

believe Dr. Levy's original claims as to results they achieved. To wit: That

the ORAL ingestion of this " Vitamin C on Steroids " as the hype had

pronounced it-----turned out (at least for us), to be ...EXACTLY THAT. E.G.

5 GRAMS of the LET-type vitamin C (taken orally) did, indeed, yield results

comparable to 50 GRAMS OF IV ADMINISTERED vitamin C. We were, simply,

ASTOUNDED... by this result. I will not attempt to elaborate on our specific

experiments, but will state that our associates achieved some UNBELIEVABLE

results in very short time windows----and some involving stage IV carcinoma

(which had proven unresponsive to ALL EXISTING ALLEOPATHIC PROTOCOLS). The

implications are simply STAGGERING.. ..for us.

The COST PROFILE simply COLLAPSES when considering such a

simple---non- toxic---- address

to an amazing number of terminal-type insults. e.g. snakebite, botulinum,

viral insults from across the entire spectrum, etc).

I must go now, but I encourage list members to conduct a web search on this

manufacturing technology and the products available... ..that actually

exhibit the nano-encapsulation technology.

Do understand that some condition/circumsta nce may present itself, that

could modify or, maybe, even negate our profound results...but I most

SERIOUSLY DOUBT such will be the case. At present, we can hardly believe our

results, but three other research groups (with whom we exchange information

periodically. ....have effected results identical to ours.

------------ ------

In our recent researches evaluating this technology and, consequently, in

searching for possible " process " improvements/ modifications which might

facilitate the " lay person " an opportunity for a DIY methodology achievable

in a home environment- --we did achieve some notable progress.

First, a brief summary of our exploratory activity. Our literature searches

revealed several companies actively exhibiting valid capability in this area

(LET).

Typical, and demonstrably capable, is a company named MICROTEK.

Microteklabs. com

Helpful information is available here.

One fact became obvious, early on, to wit: The truly striking feature of LET

was a NATURALLY-occurring characteristic. ..... and not a man-made process,

that was driving this encapsulation process. That is, this process is a

function of an automatic, " natural tendency " of certain substances (e.g.

phospholipids in this case) to form tiny vacoules or

bubbles---called liposomes--- -when in a aqueous solution under certain

conditions. "

The keystone activity is that these liposomes automatically fill themselves

with whatever aqueous solution they were in----before they were formed.

" This type of bubble, called a membrane, forms a protective barrier around

virtually every cell in the human body. "

Livon Labs has perfected a process which employs a high-pressure (1700

p.s.i.) discharge system which directs a liquid stream against a forming

plate. The high impact forces the phospholipids (soy lecithin in this case)

to form liposomes--- -so small they require an electrom microscope for

viewing. This technology does not create the LET activity.... it just

enhances it. In our personal researches we have determined the key to

exploiting the LET phenomenon appeared to be Livon's application of intense

force in their mixing methodology.

Enter the " enlightening " moment. Searching for a method of achieving

liposomal encapsulation, it occurred to us to explore ultrasonic stimulation

as an option. It worked...maybe not quite as well as Livon's " high tech "

brute force approach...but about 70% as well. Plenty efficient for our

purposes.

Our vitamin " C " liposomal encapsulation protocol is as follows:

Using a small (2 cup) Ultrasonic cleaner, (Item #03305, obtainable from

Harbor Freight @ about $30.00), we performed the following:

1. Dissolved 3 level tablespoons of soy lecithin in 1 cup of water

(preferably distilled).

2. Dissolved 1 level tablespoon of ascorbic acid powder (Vit. " C " ) in 1/2

cup

of water.

3. Poured both solutions together in the ultrasonic cleaner bowl and turned

the unit on. Using a plastic straw (leaving the top of the cleaner opened),

gently, slowly, stirred the contents. Note: The cleaner will, automatically,

self-stop about every 2 minutes. Just push ON button to continue. Repeat for

a total of 3 series (6 minutes). By that time the entire solution should be

blended into a cloudy, homogeneous,

milk-like mixture. The LET solution is now formed.

4. This protocol furnishes about 12 grams (12000mg.) of vitamin C product.

At 70% encapsulation efficiency, 8400 mg would be of the LET type. This

solution will keep, acceptably, at room temperature for 3 to 4 days.

Refrigerated, it will keep much longer. We use it so fast around our

place...there isn't enough left to be concerned over storage. The

" homogenizing effect " is so powerful that after 3 days at room temperature,

no precipitation or solution separation appears evident. This type of

sequestered vitamin " C " has demonstrated to be, at least 5 times more

effective (per volumetric measure) than any other form of orally-ingested

vitamin " c " ....that we have tested. Additionally, it appears to be even more

rapid in tissue-bed availability- ---than IV applications. An astounding

revelation.. ..to us. We estimate the DIY researcher can produce the active

LET portion of this solution for 15 cents per gram....as against about $1.00

per gram from commerci! al sources.

It is my hope that this, limited, explanation of our activities in this

area,

is of some value to our do-it-yourself health-maintenance researchers. In

any event, this protocol has demonstrated to be n on-toxic and most helpful

to OUR RESEARCHES.

Sincerely, Bradley.

p.s. A larger, more powerful, ultrasonic cleaner is now available at Harbor

Freight. Item number 91593. 2+ liters, for about $60.00. Both units have

performed quite well for us. Almost as well as our $500.00 lead zirconate

titanate, research grade, unit.

------------ --------- ---

My apologies; I neglected to outline the attendant, probable, variations in

the

protocol. What I SHOULD have said in my original post is " The visible,

obviously

homogenized, portion of the solution " , whenever I made the comment about the

stability of the completed, resultant, material.

I believe you will gain a little better knowledge of the results you

achieved, after reading my most recent comment on an inquiry by Sheila.

Bottom line----your result was perfectly normal. Interestingly, the meniscus

may present at the top...or the bottom.....or not at all. Usually if the

initial material combination

has not run long enough to incorporate a majority of the lecithin (or there

is simply too much lecithin for the available ascorbic acid fraction.... .the

meniscus will form on the top of the sample....within a few minutes after

stopping the US agitation.

If your procedure has run acceptably well and----long enough to homogenize

well, any meniscus formation will, generally, present on the BOTTOM after

overnight storage---

with or without refrigeration.

In any event, you are doing fine. If you do not want to consume the isolated

lecithin fraction you are observing, just decant the homogenized liposome

solution and

dispose of the isolated lecithin fraction.

I hope this information helps your dilema.

Sincerely, Bradley.

p.s. One just needs to continue to experiment " around-the- edges " of this

protocol, in order to achieve optimum results. Do not be reluctant to do

such...this IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE....just common sense.

------------ --------- ---

Your question has been asked by others....(private inquires addressed

directly to me). In the interest of saving me time and energy, I offer the

following explanation. First, soy lecithin is a " slow " incorporator, when

introduced into aqueous mediums....sometime s. Especially, when there is a

high

lecithin granule population ratio----relative to the total water volume. The

general reaction is that a major percentage of the lecithin blends readily

with the the water medium, but there will remain a definitive lecithin

component which floats on the surface and exhibits a somewhat " gelatinous "

appearance (this is quite natural, based upon the native characteristics of

the substances involved). Do not fret over encountering such

circumstances. .....they will not compromise the basic effectiveness of your

protocol. However, it is of some import to understand that the speed, and

completeness, of the incorporation of the granular lecithin---into the

aqueous medium, is affected by a number of conditions such as the total

amount of lecithin versus the total volume of water; the temperature of the

water-based solution and the strength of any other substance being

incorporated into the parent solution---- from very weak, to saturated (none

of which are seriously comprom! ising). Under the best of conditions, even

after ultrasonic mixing for 8 to 9 minutes....there is, often, a thin

meniscus (a distinct separation between two or more liquids in the same

container). [Example: a thin layer of oil lying on top of water.] In the

liposome generation methodology we are discussing, the visible, gelatinous,

portion of the meniscus is principally made up

of unincorporated lecithin. Is IS NOT a problem....in fact the lecithin

component has useful, cardiovascular, health-support effects----beyond those

being discussed here.

Either (or both) of two measures may be executed to reduce the volume of

unincorporated lecithin you may be encountering. First, increasing the

volume of the total water fraction, or secondly, raising the temperature of

the total parent solution

and extending the time of US reaction exposure. One reason for the condition

you are encountering is that the closer one gets to achieving a saturated

solution of lecithin.... the more resistant the process becomes to accepting

more granular lecithin into that solution---- -until the point is reached

where no further material will incorporate- --hence, THE SATURATION POINT IS

EXPERIENCED.

In my brief, original post, I did not discuss the nuances of speed, degree

or completeness of dissolution of the lecithin---- or for that matter--- the

ascorbic acid fraction. Neither did I outline a number of other

considerations; such as the effects of varying the volume of water versus

the ratios of the solution components.. ..or the total water volume versus

the protocol components.. ..primarily, because such elaborations would not

serve usefulness/effectiv ity for the nontechnical

DIY person. I simply outlined a SAFE, mid-spectrum, protocol allowing the

average lay-person to achieve a measure of acceptable results for home

experimental research.

My personal bias is that it is better to have a small, uncombined, lecithin

fraction presenting as a meniscus.... .than to strive toward what I perceive

to be a cosmetic achievement- ---of small consequence. ....by means of

diluting the total

solution. In any event the excess lecithin is a positive addition.... .it is

just not

active in the liposome process----- until some parameter changes that avails

it the opportunity participate in the encapsulation process.

My final comment on this subject: If it is of paramount importance to one,

regardless of reason.... by just increasing the water volume and

reactivating the US Cleaner for several minutes....the remaining lecithin

will (in almost all cases) go into the emulsified solution. However, bear in

mind, you have diluted the entire solution by an equivalent

strength---- -with NO increase in total vitamin C component.

Please understand, these comments are not meant to browbeat " anyone " .... in

any way....but, rather, to aid the less technically- informed on the list.

Sincerely, Bradley.

------------ ------

Although not scientifically rigorous, I offer a simple test which will yield

the

DIY researcher some element of confidence that they do, in fact, have a

useful measure of liposomal

encapsulate.

First, pour about 4 ounces of your finished Vitamin C encapsulate into a

cylindrical, 12 ounce

water glass. Next, place 1/4 teaspoon of sodium bicarbonate into about 1

ounce of distilled water and stir

for 3 to 5 seconds. Next, pour the sodium bicarbonate solution into the

Vitamin C mixture and stir gently for several seconds. Note: If the

foam/bubble line which forms on top is 1/2 inch or less---in height---you

have about a 50% encapsulation efficiency. If the foam/bubble line is 3/8 of

one inch...or less, you have about a 60% efficiency. If the

foam/bubble line is 1/8 inch or less, you have about 75% efficiency. If the

foam/bubble line is

just a trace.....you should major in chemistry.

The percentages given above, represent the amount of the total Vitamin C

component incorporated during the encapsulation process..... that was

actually encapsulated. The less encapsulation. ...the greater the foaming.

What is, actually, occurring in this test is that the ascorbic acid fraction

is being transformed into the sodium ascorbate form of vitamin C. This test

does not negatively affect the usefulness of the solution you have

tested.....as the isolated Vitamin C component is not adversely affecting

the encapsulate (which is being protected by the lecithin bubble-covering. )

Actually, the sodium ascorbate form of vitamin C is greater than an

order-of-magnitude more soluble for tissue incorporation. .....than is the

ascorbic acid form.

In any event this simple test should serve to raise the level of confidence

in the DIY researcher.. ..

that they do---in fact---have a useful measure of encapsulated vitamin C.

Sincerely, Bradley.