Guest guest Posted October 12, 2009 Report Share Posted October 12, 2009 On 10/12/2009, jim (6840268@...) wrote: > If you want to go beyond what Dr. Simoncini and Royal Rife observed, > then you will have to do your own investigations. Royal Rife claimed > to have watched the cancer virus transform into a fungus (candida). I've read his book, and am familiar with (and believe it has merit) the theory of pleomorphism. He claimed to have seen a single organism transform itself into each different type of organism (microzyma (or somatid or protits) > bacteria > virus > fungus > mycrozyma. So... it is a fungus because it happens to be the fungal stage that Simoncini saw? Why pick that one particular stage? Thats all I'm saying. > He exploded the organism with his frequency device and the disease > disappeared.... proof? Yes - but he exploded each different form with a differenr frequency... But, which form is the 'fundamental' or 'primal' form? Is it the fungal form? Or the bacterial form? Or the viral form? > Dr. Simoncini has been looking at cancer cells since the early '60's > and says that they are undoubtedly a fungus. You can go to his > website and see his videos of what it looks like and hear his > argument. I have seen some of his videos. The evidence is interesting, and undeniably relevant. > It is very easy to be a skeptic. All you need do is look the other > way and doubt. Wrong. There is such a thing as healthy skepticism, where one questions with their eyes and mind open, honestly seeking the truth - and there is unhealthy skepticism, where one questions for dishonest reasons, e.g., to avoid the painful realization that you may be directly responsible for the deaths of hundreds (thinking of the 'doctors' skeptical of Semmelweis' claims). > That is what the mainstream commonly does when offered alternatives > to their " scientific proofs " that stare them in the face. You, > Tanstaafl, have other options though. With all of the information > available to us today on the web, that is a cop-out, IMHO. I have > done my homework. Have you? Yep. I don't think we're really arguing... I'm simply not willing to blindly accept that Simoncini is right and that 'cancer is a fungus'. I think thats way too simplistic. Maybe it is really simply an imbalance in the inner sanctum that exhibits different symptoms for different people at different times for different reasons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2009 Report Share Posted October 12, 2009 J of I please inform me as well with Type 1 diabetes is caused by fungus of any sort?? > > Hi J of I: > > Where did you get it that the fungus Aspergillusis causes diabetes? > My niece has Type I and I have been intensely studying it over the last > year. > > Regards, > Jim > > . > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 Hi healinghope and Jim, Aspergillus fungi is injected into lab animals to purposely induce diabetes. I need to locate the reference to find out whether they were talking about Type I or Type II diabetes, or both. J of I > > > > Hi J of I: > > > > Where did you get it that the fungus Aspergillusis causes diabetes? > > My niece has Type I and I have been intensely studying it over the last > > year. > > > > Regards, > > Jim > > > > . > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.