Re: Re: Cancer vs MMS

[Guest guest]

If

you listen to Dr. Simoncini, he clearly believes... and makes a strong

case that the pleomorphic form of Candida IS the cancer itself. If you

want to prevent the Candida/ cancer from getting a toe-hold,

there is good reason to believe that the best way to accomplish

this is to eat an alkalizing diet, not take MMS forever. There is

good reason to believe that long term use of MMS on a daily basis would

prematurely age you.. Since it is a powerful oxidant, it would most

likely cause oxidation of the cells. For this reason, it is adviseable

that you not combine antioxidants and MMS at one sitting, but instead

take an antioxidant after the MMS has dissipated.

>One factor to consider is that MMS doses at almost any level are

one of

the best cancer preventatives. It seems certain now that that cancer is

caused by a morphing microbe that gets< > inside a normal cell

after

circulating by blood to its resting place. That microbe would never

find a hosting place among your cells if even a little MMS was

circulating as often as <

> possible. A small amount taken frequently might

prevent the formation and development of cancer.<

Attachment: vcard [not shown]

[Guest guest]

On 10/16/2009 11:18 PM, gtbradford wrote:

> I was told that a standard regimine off MMS1 is anywhere from 9

> months to 15 months . . . . . . Does anyone know what the standard

> Regimine for MMS2 is ?

This is all theoretical/experimental at best.

As long as you understand we are just theorizing, I'll be happy to

participate...

In my opinion, MMS1 should be regarded as a cleansing/detox tool, as

well as an emergency medical tool. If I get sick or am diagnosed with

some deadly disease, then I'll ramp up the MMS1 to the max (6+ drops

once per hour) for as long as it takes. Otherwise, I will just use it as

a part of my periodical cleansing regimen - ie, one week (full protocol)

during my summer/winter cleanses, and 2 weeks (full protocol) during my

spring/fall cleanses. I don't think I'll be taking daily 'maintenance'

doses on a regular basis once I've completed the full HIV protocol,

although I think I will extend that protocol to a full two months, as

opposed to 3 weeks, to make sure I get all of the candida.

MMS2 is different though. It doesn't result in the production of a

foreign substance like Chlorine Dioxide, it produces Hypochlorous Acid,

which is a also produced by your own body's immune system. You could

look at this two ways:

1) Since it is naturally produced by your body, taking it from an

external source might actually suppress/reduce the body's own natural

production, or

2) It won't suppress/reduce the body's own natural production, but in

fact will simply augment it in this toxic soup we call the modern world.

Well that was fun - but I don't know which is more likely to be correct,

or if either is.

My point is, no one knows enough to answer your question with absolute

certainty unless they have done extensive scientific testing, which I

doubt anyone has at this point. However, I would certainly be interested

in what someone with an in-depth knowledge of bio-chemistry had to say.

[Guest guest]

There are posts here in the archive where a couple of ladies experienced much face skin sagging and wrinkling due to over use of MMS (oxidant) which, when they stopped the MMS and started taking large doses of antioxidants (like vit. C) they were able to quickly reverse the sagging.

They would not give up MMS though, but they did slack off on the amount they took and the frequency, being sure to also take antioxidants to counter the effects of the oxidant.

Like anything else, some people are more sensitive than others. Just be sure you pay attention to your body, how you feel and what reactions you have when taking anything, MMS included.

Samala,

-------Original Message-------

Hey if I can maintain feel good young and not ache, who cares if I wrinkle some not that I have found research to support or not support this yet.