Re: MMS is an oxygenating therapy

[Guest guest]

I did not suggest that you avoid MMS entirely. My warning was

against taking it for a prolonged period on a daily basis.

As far as research goes... get real... what mainstream research have

you found that MMS works at all? The antioxidant theory is fairly well

accepted by both sides of the fence... both allotropic medicine and

naturopaths accept it as valid. This theory basically says that free

radicals age us and, therefore, we benefit from taking antioxidants.

Anyone vaguely familiar with how MMS works accepts the idea that it is

an oxidant and thus gives up an oxygen free radical in order to perform

its magic. On the opposite end of the spectrum, if you take enough

powerful enough antioxidants (like resveratrol), you will create a

powerful biological domain that will kill invaders before they get

started.

While there is no arguing that both sides of the domain work, the

bottom line is that with the MMS (oxygenation) approach, any oxygen

radical that does not burn up an invader goes off and rusts

your system. The rational is quite clear and carries to H2O2 or any

oxygenating therapy. In fact, when you see athletes breathing oxygen

on the sidelines, you can be sure that they are prematurely aging their

bodies to a degree. The same goes with people who are ill and require

oxygen... long term it will burn them up and destroy their bodies.

The bottom line is, where other less radical therapies will substitute,

avoid MMS... and, when necessary, don't take it any more than you

must. Certainly, a diet that strengthens the immune system and thus

avoids health problems in the first place is far superior to MMS.

healinghope wrote:

Hey if I can maintain feel good young and not ache, who cares if I

wrinkle some not that I have found research to support or not support

this yet.

>

>

> <http://about-vitamin-b17.blogspot.com/2009/03/vitamin-b17-apricot-seeds-against.html>If

> you listen to Dr. Simoncini, he clearly believes... and makes a

strong

> case that the pleomorphic form of Candida IS the cancer itself. If

you

> want to prevent the Candida/ cancer from getting a toe-hold, there

is

> good reason to believe that the best way to accomplish this is to

eat an

> alkalizing diet, not take MMS forever. There is good reason to

believe

> that long term use of MMS on a daily basis would prematurely age

you..

> Since it is a powerful oxidant, it would most likely cause

oxidation of

> the cells. For this reason, it is adviseable that you not combine

> antioxidants and MMS at one sitting, but instead take an

antioxidant

> after the MMS has dissipated.

>

> >One factor to consider is that MMS doses at almost any level

are one

> of the best cancer preventatives. It seems certain now that that

cancer

> is caused by a morphing microbe that gets< > inside a normal

cell after

> circulating by blood to its resting place. That microbe would

never find

> a hosting place among your cells if even a little MMS was

circulating as

> often as <

> > possible. A small amount taken frequently might prevent the

formation

> and development of cancer.<

>

> >

> >

>

Attachment: vcard [not shown]

[Guest guest]

Not sure I agree with the rusting body if no invader or pathogen is found.

When a chlorine dioxide ion contacts a harmful pathogen, it instantly rips up to

five electrons from the pathogen, in what can be likened to a microscopic

explosion… harmless to us, but terminal for pathogens.

The pathogen – an electron donor – is rendered harmless due to the involuntary

surrendering of its electrons to the chlorine dioxide – an electron acceptor –

and the resulting release of energy. Oxidized by the chlorine ion, the former

pathogen becomes a harmless salt.

This process benefits a body that has become toxic. Throughout the body,

anywhere chlorine dioxide ions – transported via red blood cells – come in

contact with pathogens, the pathogens give up their electrons and cease to

exist. The chlorine dioxide armed cells only " detonate " on contact with

pathogens, which include harmful bacteria, viruses, toxins, heavy metals, and

parasites. All of these will have pH values that are out of the body's range of

good health. They will also have a positive ionic charge. The chlorine dioxide

equipped cells do not oxidize beneficial bacteria, or healthy cells, as their pH

levels are 7 or above, and hold a negative ion charge.

Chlorine dioxide ions will oxidize – meaning vaporize – diseased cells…

anything that is acidic, with a positive ion charge. If the chlorine dioxide

ions encounter no pathogens or other poisons, it deteriorates into table salt

and in some instances, hypochlorous acid, which the body can also use.

> > While there is no arguing that both sides of the domain work, the

> > bottom line is that with the MMS (oxygenation) approach, any oxygen

> > radical that does not burn up an invader goes off and rusts your

> > system. The rational is quite clear and carries to H2O2 or any

> > oxygenating therapy. In fact, when you see athletes breathing oxygen

> > on the sidelines, you can be sure that they are prematurely aging

> > their bodies to a degree. The same goes with people who are ill and

> > require oxygen... long term it will burn them up and destroy their

> > bodies.

>

> An excellent article on how oxygen and anti-oxidants are used in the body:

>

>

http://pathogensoup.blogspot.com/2009/04/swine-flu-arlen-specter-d-and-fake-air.\

html

>

> or

>

> http://tiny.pl/hq8dd

>

[Guest guest]

Hi J of I,

Will write more after I have a change to absorb what you said and reread it.

THANK YOU for your thoughtful reply. I will have more questions and hopefully

we can dialogue some more. All I can for now is I wish I lived next door to you

and your wife and vice versa. ..support and recognization of "things" not seen

is so important and vital to recovery.

psalm 23:6

sue