Guest guest Posted August 17, 2009 Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 August 13, 2009 by Wade. " Chemotherapy agents may kill off 99 percent of cells in a tumor, but the stem cells that remain can make the cancer recur, the theory holds, or spread to other tissues to cause new cancers. Stem cells, unlike mature cells, can constantly renew themselves and are thought to be the source of cancers when, through mutations in their DNA, they throw off their natural restraints. " A practical test of this theory has been difficult because cancer stem cells are hard to recognize and have proved elusive targets. But a team at the Broad Institute, a Harvard-M.I.T. collaborative for genomics research, has devised a way of screening for drugs that attack cancer stem cells but leave ordinary cells unharmed. Cancer stem cells are hard to maintain in sufficient numbers, but the Broad Institute team devised a genetic manipulation to keep breast cancer stem cells trapped in the stem cell state. " This and further information on nonstem cancer cells in a tumor can be found at this web site: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/14/health/research/14cancer.html?_r=1 ********************************* July 8, 2009 by Wade: " An antibiotic, rapamycin is already in use for suppressing the immune system in transplant patients and for treating certain cancers. Rapamycin treatment had the remarkable effect of extending life even though it was not started in the right dose until the mice had lived 600 days — equivalent to a person at age 60. Most interventions that prolong life in mice, including a very low-calorie diet, need to be started early in life to show any effect. " A test of two doses of resveratrol, the ingredient of red wine that is thought to mimic the effects of caloric restriction on longevity. The results have not been published, but Christoph Westphal, chief executive of Sirtris, a company exploring the health effects of resveratrol and similar chemicals, said the tests “are seeing quite modest effects of resveratrol.” The above is quoted in part from this published article in NY Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/09/health/research/09aging.html ************************************** June 28, 2009 by Wade in NY Times " A new method of attacking cancer cells, developed by researchers in Australia, has proved surprisingly effective in animal tests. The method is intended to sidestep two major drawbacks of standard chemotherapy: the treatment’s lack of specificity and the fact that cancer cells often develop resistance. " H. Friend, head of cancer research at Merck until early this year, said he had been following EnGeneIC’s work for more than a year, and praised the company for trying a method that others had written off without trying. “I consider the approach is remarkable and more than intriguing,” said Dr. Friend, who is now at Sage Bionetworks in Seattle. But he warned that cancer cells are very versatile and can “evolve around any pressure you put on them,” so that no single approach is likely to afford a cure. " The EnGeneIC method uses minicells to deliver a variety of agents to tumor cells, including both anticancer toxins and mechanisms for suppressing the genes that make tumors resistant to toxins. The minicells are generated from mutant bacteria which, each time they divide, pinch off small bubbles of cell membrane. The minicells can be loaded with chemicals and coated with antibodies that direct them toward tumor cells. " For general information, content has been abbreviated and copied from the following website: For full disclosure, read entire article. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/29/health/research/29drug.html FYI, Lottie Duthu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.