What our DAN said about porphyrin analysis results

[Guest guest]

While at the DANs today, I asked whether the first and second run of

porphyrin analyses we took for the kids (from Philippe Auguste in

Paris) differed because metals had been " shaken up " and became more

visible during the course of treatment. She said yes.

I thought this was interesting because of some discussions about UPPA

results " being all over the place " for some patients when testing is

repeated over a period of time. I'm not sure upon what this DAN based

her assertion. I thought, from my rank layman's perspective, that it

made sense that if you remove allergens from the diet and add

supplements which increase the body's ability to detox that, even

without chelating, metals will be back on the move (hopefully on their

way out).

Our first UPPAs showed moderate levels of mercury for both kids. The

second UPPAs showed high amounts of mercury, lead and arsenic for both

kids, despite the fact that we stopped vaccinating, removed all the

kids' lead-tainted toys, etc.. In between the two sets of tests were

months on the GF/CF/SF diet and treatment for malabsorbtion issues,

treatment of yeast etc.. Only now are we considering chelating. The

improvements in the kids just from dietary restrictions alone have been

massive and their glutathione levels have improved and other labs,

especially issues of malabsorbtion and yeast.

Any comments? I just find it fascinating that both kids showed the same

pattern of equivalent improvements in health, labs and behavior along

with increasing " visibility " of metals.