Thimerosal Down but Autism Rising

[Guest guest]

I was looking to see if anyone had posted this story on here yet. I

couldn't find it, so I thought I would throw it on here for everyone's

views...Sounds like more spint to me.

Regards,

Steve

http://tinyurl.com/2fu2xz

[Guest guest]

I would like to see the raw data on this one. The

blurb I ready clearly said 3-5 yo's but in truth the

Regional Centers take in all qualifying children up to

age 21. So if you have people migrating from other

States (or even from abroad), the potential is there

for older children who had no access to centers like

this being taken in as new clients when they would be

of an age to have been born well before thimerosal was

phased out. And immigrants from 3rd World countries

would have gotten some of their shots with WHO's

still-containing-thimerosal formulations.

I find it ironic that when the CA numbers looked bad

for thimerosal, the appologists and corporate shills

were quik to make claims that the CA numbers were

meqaningless, because they were not prevalance

figures, they were not collated by birth cohorts, etc.

but now that someone has made them appear to

exonnerate thimerosal suddenly they are on the money.

Perhaps Mr. Rollens could get access to the data from

the last ten years and collate each year's numbers

according to birth year as well as whether the child

was born in CA or not?

________________________________________________________________________________\

____

Never miss a thing. Make your home page.

http://www./r/hs

[Guest guest]

Well I do know that a lot of autism families are moving in from out of state.

The services

are better here than in any of the surrounding states. We moved here in 2005 for

that

reason. I am a biomedical parent volunteer for FEAT, and we have had a lot of

new parents

(and the families doing biomed make up a very small amount of families); there

are a lot of

kids in my childrens SpEd classes that have moved here in recent years.

>

> I would like to see the raw data on this one. The

> blurb I ready clearly said 3-5 yo's but in truth the

> Regional Centers take in all qualifying children up to

> age 21. So if you have people migrating from other

> States (or even from abroad), the potential is there

> for older children who had no access to centers like

> this being taken in as new clients when they would be

> of an age to have been born well before thimerosal was

> phased out. And immigrants from 3rd World countries

> would have gotten some of their shots with WHO's

> still-containing-thimerosal formulations.

>

> I find it ironic that when the CA numbers looked bad

> for thimerosal, the appologists and corporate shills

> were quik to make claims that the CA numbers were

> meqaningless, because they were not prevalance

> figures, they were not collated by birth cohorts, etc.

> but now that someone has made them appear to

> exonnerate thimerosal suddenly they are on the money.

>

> Perhaps Mr. Rollens could get access to the data from

> the last ten years and collate each year's numbers

> according to birth year as well as whether the child

> was born in CA or not?

>

>

>

>

>

________________________________________________________________________________\

____

> Never miss a thing. Make your home page.

> http://www./r/hs

>