California

[Guest guest]

California Figures for Autism I have not seen the 2008 or late 2007 California data so this is talking of California data from 2 years ago in 2005 referring in turn to previous years 2002 through to 2004. A study showed that out of 5 developmental conditions for children that in every case there were with a 5 per cent error either static or falling numbers of these neurological cases. Some conditions fell by as much as 50 per cent and autism was hovering falling one year and rising the next but with a five per cent leeway static or falling possibly. The introduction of new mercury vaccines for children in California in 2002 will not have had an effect on the figures above but in view of the fall above doesn’t it seem like premeditated murder or attempted murder to introduce a known brain destroying chemical into children’s vaccine schedules again with figures as clear as these? Harm from mercury was clear, known and even filmed doing its destructive work on brain nerve cells many years before the authorities allowed mercury back into vaccines in 2002. The ability of man to obfuscate knows no limits. Is this peace time warfare to control populations? Fryer MSc BSc Chemist DIAGNOSIS: SUMMARY TABLES (California Study 2005 for various neurological conditions)New 200220032004MR3 0131 9641 721AUT3 5243 4293 554CP2 3571 6181 372EP2 3781 5971 276C51 8331 5421 341 Out of 15 pieces of data there is one single blip or rise in numbers with time and this is the rise to 3 554 which is less than 5 per cent different from previous years figure and may be artifactorial. The other figures show clear and unambiguous retreat from neurological problems in line with some positive steps taken in previous years. A breakdown of ages of the children would be essential data and with modern computers the only problem to such data would be political sensitivity.