Re: We need to do something!

[Guest guest]

-come on guys and gals are we going to allow this or are we going to

get something done? I know some are mad at but we can't use

that as an excuse to abandon our kids by allowing this kind of

corrupt judging. Our kids deserve better than this-

- In EOHarm , " sammysouthie " <sammysouthie@...> wrote:

>

> Hi all,

> In lue of this Judges negligence I think we should all e-mail

talkshow

> host and try to get this the attention it needs. I believe this

corrupt

> judge is attempting at setting a precedent.Allowing one side to

present

> evidence and not allowing the otherside to present is

unconstitutional.

> this judge doesn't have any background in science and is not

qualified

> to decide what is and is not science. Sine when does the defendant

get

> to set the tone of what is and is not generally accepted? Only when

> ther has been a big pay off. We shouldn't take this lying down. If

we

> do they will continue to run over our children. we need to send a

loud

> and clear message that it is NOT o-kay to damage our children and

brush

> them off.

> Can we please all try to involve as much media as possible?

> Thanyou

>

[Guest guest]

SammieSouthie = Bestsammysouthie <sammysouthie@...> wrote: -come on guys and gals are we going to allow this or are we going to get something done? I know some are mad at but we can't use that as an excuse to abandon our kids by allowing this kind of corrupt judging. Our kids deserve better than this- - In EOHarm , "sammysouthie" <sammysouthie@...> wrote: > > Hi all, > In lue of this Judges negligence I think we should all

e-mail talkshow > host and try to get this the attention it needs. I believe this corrupt > judge is attempting at setting a precedent.Allowing one side to present > evidence and not allowing the otherside to present is unconstitutional. > this judge doesn't have any background in science and is not qualified > to decide what is and is not science. Sine when does the defendant get > to set the tone of what is and is not generally accepted? Only when > ther has been a big pay off. We shouldn't take this lying down. If we > do they will continue to run over our children. we need to send a loud > and clear message that it is NOT o-kay to damage our children and brush > them off. > Can we please all try to involve as much media as possible? > Thanyou >

Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Search.

[Guest guest]

-Wrong! I just think we shouldn't be letting judges decide what

science is or is not. I personally am tired of people trying to sweep

us and our children under the rug. Lenny is more than welcome to do

an ip check.

-- In EOHarm , Pat Howregan <pathow73clp@...> wrote:

>

> SammieSouthie = Best

>

> sammysouthie <sammysouthie@...>

wrote: -come on guys and gals are we

going to allow this or are we going to

> get something done? I know some are mad at but we can't use

> that as an excuse to abandon our kids by allowing this kind of

> corrupt judging. Our kids deserve better than this-

>

> - In EOHarm , " sammysouthie " <sammysouthie@> wrote:

> >

> > Hi all,

> > In lue of this Judges negligence I think we should all e-mail

> talkshow

> > host and try to get this the attention it needs. I believe this

> corrupt

> > judge is attempting at setting a precedent.Allowing one side to

> present

> > evidence and not allowing the otherside to present is

> unconstitutional.

> > this judge doesn't have any background in science and is not

> qualified

> > to decide what is and is not science. Sine when does the

defendant

> get

> > to set the tone of what is and is not generally accepted? Only

when

> > ther has been a big pay off. We shouldn't take this lying down.

If

> we

> > do they will continue to run over our children. we need to send

a

> loud

> > and clear message that it is NOT o-kay to damage our children

and

> brush

> > them off.

> > Can we please all try to involve as much media as possible?

> > Thanyou

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

> ---------------------------------

> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with

Search.

>

[Guest guest]

Fascinating how a Best thread brings out the lurkers... Things

that make you go hmmmmmm?

> >

> > Hi all,

> > In lue of this Judges negligence I think we should all e-mail

> talkshow

> > host and try to get this the attention it needs. I believe this

> corrupt

> > judge is attempting at setting a precedent.Allowing one side to

> present

> > evidence and not allowing the otherside to present is

> unconstitutional.

> > this judge doesn't have any background in science and is not

> qualified

> > to decide what is and is not science. Sine when does the

defendant

> get

> > to set the tone of what is and is not generally accepted? Only

when

> > ther has been a big pay off. We shouldn't take this lying down.

If

> we

> > do they will continue to run over our children. we need to send

a

> loud

> > and clear message that it is NOT o-kay to damage our children

and

> brush

> > them off.

> > Can we please all try to involve as much media as possible?

> > Thanyou

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

> ---------------------------------

> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with

Search.

>

[Guest guest]

Lol, I'm thinking that Best does not equal Sammy. If that were

so, that would be a pretty impressive and time-consuming job of

identity concealment through writing style. Kudos to anyone who could

pull that off.

> >

> > Hi all,

> > In lue of this Judges negligence I think we should all e-mail

> talkshow

> > host and try to get this the attention it needs. I believe this

> corrupt

> > judge is attempting at setting a precedent.Allowing one side to

> present

> > evidence and not allowing the otherside to present is

> unconstitutional.

> > this judge doesn't have any background in science and is not

> qualified

> > to decide what is and is not science. Sine when does the

defendant

> get

> > to set the tone of what is and is not generally accepted? Only

when

> > ther has been a big pay off. We shouldn't take this lying down.

If

> we

> > do they will continue to run over our children. we need to send

a

> loud

> > and clear message that it is NOT o-kay to damage our children

and

> brush

> > them off.

> > Can we please all try to involve as much media as possible?

> > Thanyou

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

> ---------------------------------

> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with

Search.

>

[Guest guest]

> > >

> > > Hi all,

> > > In lue of this Judges negligence I think we should all e-mail

> > talkshow

> > > host and try to get this the attention it needs. I believe

this

> > corrupt

> > > judge is attempting at setting a precedent.Allowing one side

to

> > present

> > > evidence and not allowing the otherside to present is

> > unconstitutional.

> > > this judge doesn't have any background in science and is not

> > qualified

> > > to decide what is and is not science. Sine when does the

> defendant

> > get

> > > to set the tone of what is and is not generally accepted? Only

> when

> > > ther has been a big pay off. We shouldn't take this lying

down.

> If

> > we

> > > do they will continue to run over our children. we need to

send

> a

> > loud

> > > and clear message that it is NOT o-kay to damage our children

> and

> > brush

> > > them off.

> > > Can we please all try to involve as much media as possible?

> > > Thanyou

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ---------------------------------

> > Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with

> Search.

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Sammy, for clarification... I was referencing " Pat " more than anyone

else (in terms of a lurker). You see, I always wonder about people

who are never heard from here or who use their very first post here

(as Pat has done) to criticize someone so strongly. It seems to me

that " Pat's " very first post on this list recently was this:

" Best is more than angry. He is unhinged and deeply disturbed,

and we should all be concerned about his child for that reason alone " .

Pat's second post here was trying to out you, Sammy, as Best.

Things like that always smell like a lurker/ND sympathizer.

When someone comes out swinging about the safety or concern of

someone's else's child (in this case, Best's) -- my first

thought is... Which ND lurker is this? Certainly, I could be wrong

but clearly " Pat " knows more about the dynamics and personalities on

this list than he/she has let on to... So, perhaps an introduction

post would be in order. I'm just sayin'...

-- In EOHarm , " sammysouthie " <sammysouthie@...> wrote:

>

>

> > > >

> > > > Hi all,

> > > > In lue of this Judges negligence I think we should all e-

mail

> > > talkshow

> > > > host and try to get this the attention it needs. I believe

> this

> > > corrupt

> > > > judge is attempting at setting a precedent.Allowing one side

> to

> > > present

> > > > evidence and not allowing the otherside to present is

> > > unconstitutional.

> > > > this judge doesn't have any background in science and is not

> > > qualified

> > > > to decide what is and is not science. Sine when does the

> > defendant

> > > get

> > > > to set the tone of what is and is not generally accepted?

Only

> > when

> > > > ther has been a big pay off. We shouldn't take this lying

> down.

> > If

> > > we

> > > > do they will continue to run over our children. we need to

> send

> > a

> > > loud

> > > > and clear message that it is NOT o-kay to damage our

children

> > and

> > > brush

> > > > them off.

> > > > Can we please all try to involve as much media as possible?

> > > > Thanyou

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ---------------------------------

> > > Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with

>

> > Search.

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Who is this Pat lady?

> >

> > SammieSouthie = Best

> >

>

[Guest guest]

It's Pat - from Pat and Patti's backpack shack... At 50% off, these

prices are Whack... Oh look there's Jack Black and the members of

Fleetwood Mack...

> > >

> > > SammieSouthie = Best

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

ROFLMBO!!!!!

I wonder if Pat has any fat cats wearing hats walking on mats while

eating rats as they sat?

> >

> > Who is this Pat lady?

> >

>

[Guest guest]

I like cheese...

> > >

> > > Who is this Pat lady?

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

I am a lurker. I

rarely post but this whole conversation and all of its energy should be used

for the sake of our kids. Remember how Rome accomplished its mission; DIVIDE AND

CONQUER. It looks like that is what is happening amongst us. The

judge will apparently do what he needs to do as we all sit back and fight

amongst ourselves. Let’s move on and get back onto the task of what

is happening with this judge and how we can get him to take notice of us all;

the parents of children with autism that are being continually abandoned by the

system.

From:

EOHarm [mailto:EOHarm ] On Behalf Of sammysouthie

Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008

12:32 PM

EOHarm

Subject: Re: We need to

do something!

-Wrong! I just think we shouldn't be letting judges

decide what

science is or is not. I personally am tired of people trying to sweep

us and our children under the rug. Lenny is more than welcome to do

an ip check.

-- In EOHarm ,

Pat Howregan <pathow73clp@...> wrote:

>

> SammieSouthie = Best

>

> sammysouthie <sammysouthie@...>

wrote: -come on guys and gals are we

going to allow this or are we going to

> get something done? I know some are mad at but we can't use

> that as an excuse to abandon our kids by allowing this kind of

> corrupt judging. Our kids deserve better than this-

>

> - In EOHarm ,

" sammysouthie " <sammysouthie@> wrote:

> >

> > Hi all,

> > In lue of this Judges negligence I think we should all e-mail

> talkshow

> > host and try to get this the attention it needs. I believe this

> corrupt

> > judge is attempting at setting a precedent.Allowing one side to

> present

> > evidence and not allowing the otherside to present is

> unconstitutional.

> > this judge doesn't have any background in science and is not

> qualified

> > to decide what is and is not science. Sine when does the

defendant

> get

> > to set the tone of what is and is not generally accepted? Only

when

> > ther has been a big pay off. We shouldn't take this lying down.

If

> we

> > do they will continue to run over our children. we need to send

a

> loud

> > and clear message that it is NOT o-kay to damage our children

and

> brush

> > them off.

> > Can we please all try to involve as much media as possible?

> > Thanyou

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

> ---------------------------------

> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with

Search.

>

[Guest guest]

--I couldn't agree more.

- In EOHarm , " Petsos " <ionikos5@...> wrote:

>

> I am a lurker. I rarely post but this whole conversation and all

of its

> energy should be used for the sake of our kids. Remember how Rome

> accomplished its mission; DIVIDE AND CONQUER. It looks like that

is what is

> happening amongst us. The judge will apparently do what he needs

to do as

> we all sit back and fight amongst ourselves. Let's move on and get

back

> onto the task of what is happening with this judge and how we can

get him to

> take notice of us all; the parents of children with autism that are

being

> continually abandoned by the system.

>

>

>

> _____

>

> From: EOHarm [mailto:EOHarm ] On

Behalf Of

> sammysouthie

> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 12:32 PM

> EOHarm

> Subject: Re: We need to do something!

>

>

>

> -Wrong! I just think we shouldn't be letting judges decide what

> science is or is not. I personally am tired of people trying to

sweep

> us and our children under the rug. Lenny is more than welcome to do

> an ip check.

>

> -- In EOHarmgroups (DOT) <mailto:EOHarm%40> com, Pat

> Howregan <pathow73clp@> wrote:

> >

> > SammieSouthie = Best

> >

> > sammysouthie <sammysouthie@>

> wrote: -come on guys and gals are we

> going to allow this or are we going to

> > get something done? I know some are mad at but we can't use

> > that as an excuse to abandon our kids by allowing this kind of

> > corrupt judging. Our kids deserve better than this-

> >

> > - In EOHarmgroups (DOT) <mailto:EOHarm%40> com,

> " sammysouthie " <sammysouthie@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Hi all,

> > > In lue of this Judges negligence I think we should all e-mail

> > talkshow

> > > host and try to get this the attention it needs. I believe this

> > corrupt

> > > judge is attempting at setting a precedent.Allowing one side to

> > present

> > > evidence and not allowing the otherside to present is

> > unconstitutional.

> > > this judge doesn't have any background in science and is not

> > qualified

> > > to decide what is and is not science. Sine when does the

> defendant

> > get

> > > to set the tone of what is and is not generally accepted? Only

> when

> > > ther has been a big pay off. We shouldn't take this lying down.

> If

> > we

> > > do they will continue to run over our children. we need to send

> a

> > loud

> > > and clear message that it is NOT o-kay to damage our children

> and

> > brush

> > > them off.

> > > Can we please all try to involve as much media as possible?

> > > Thanyou

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ---------------------------------

> > Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with

> Search.

> >

>

[Guest guest]

My op, the ND crowd should be iggied. By spending time on their sites,

it just makes one nuts, some have tried to tell to stay away from

them, but God love him, he hates the crap they speak. And, I contacted

the ring leader about helping us with 's case, the little boy

who was brutalized under the guise of " restraint. " One would thing

that a ND would want to jump on the bandwagon of helping a 45lb, 9

yr-old size of 5 yr-old boy who is essentially non-verbal. I've not

heard a thing from anyone in that crowd.

I think the silence of the ND group speaks volumes.

Debi

[Guest guest]

The Neurodiverse have a single agenda.... KILL THE SCIENCE OF CAUSATION and

exonerate

the vaccine program.

" diversity " is a smoke screen. Nobody in their right mind can look at these kids

and think

something horrible hasn't happened to them. That they're just " different. " That

there aren't

any MORE of them than before. In grade school in the 70's... there weren't ANY

kids like

this when I grew up. Now I can go to any school and see a few dozen.

The neurodiverse will be stopped when their funding stops.

>

> My op, the ND crowd should be iggied. By spending time on their sites,

> it just makes one nuts, some have tried to tell to stay away from

> them, but God love him, he hates the crap they speak. And, I contacted

> the ring leader about helping us with 's case, the little boy

> who was brutalized under the guise of " restraint. " One would thing

> that a ND would want to jump on the bandwagon of helping a 45lb, 9

> yr-old size of 5 yr-old boy who is essentially non-verbal. I've not

> heard a thing from anyone in that crowd.

>

> I think the silence of the ND group speaks volumes.

>

> Debi

>

[Guest guest]

boston legal is on ABC, and they said that the ticks are endearing and cute was said by one of the attny's.a women at the end of the story that attny.was acting excited and started mimicing the autistic attny. ABC done this on purpose not for our kid's sake to be seen the same but to act as if nothing bad has happened to our children. You can bet the CDC was involved in creating that character on purpose and his age is in the 40's no conspiracy's here I suggust people look up the definition. Nanstiel <erik@...> wrote: The Neurodiverse have a single agenda.... KILL THE SCIENCE OF CAUSATION and exonerate the vaccine program."diversity" is a smoke screen. Nobody in their right mind can look at these kids and think something horrible hasn't happened to them. That they're just "different." That there aren't any MORE of them than before. In grade school in the 70's... there weren't ANY kids like this when I grew up. Now I can go to any school and see a few dozen.The neurodiverse will be stopped when their funding stops.>> My op, the ND crowd should be iggied. By spending time on their sites,> it just makes one nuts, some have tried to tell to stay away from> them, but God love him, he hates the crap

they speak. And, I contacted> the ring leader about helping us with 's case, the little boy> who was brutalized under the guise of "restraint." One would thing> that a ND would want to jump on the bandwagon of helping a 45lb, 9> yr-old size of 5 yr-old boy who is essentially non-verbal. I've not> heard a thing from anyone in that crowd.> > I think the silence of the ND group speaks volumes.> > Debi>

[Guest guest]

The raison d'être of the NDers is to react in opposition to parents of

autistic children and not the challenge the status quo. The guise is

that they are doing it for the noble protection of oppressed autistic

children. But based on my advanced Google degree in psychology, I

would venture that they are only acting out against perceived injuries

from own hated parents. This makes sense since autism is purely

genetic, right? Mom and dad are the cause for their unhappiness, not

vaccines. Can't let mom and dad off the hook, can they?

Lenny

p.s. For those of you with a public education, " raison d'être " is

" reason for existing " in Canadian. " Status quo " is an Italian movie

about chariots.

>

> My op, the ND crowd should be iggied. By spending time on their sites,

> it just makes one nuts, some have tried to tell to stay away from

> them, but God love him, he hates the crap they speak. And, I contacted

> the ring leader about helping us with 's case, the little boy

> who was brutalized under the guise of " restraint. " One would thing

> that a ND would want to jump on the bandwagon of helping a 45lb, 9

> yr-old size of 5 yr-old boy who is essentially non-verbal. I've not

> heard a thing from anyone in that crowd.

>

> I think the silence of the ND group speaks volumes.

>

> Debi

>

[Guest guest]

> >

> > My op, the ND crowd should be iggied. By spending time on their

sites,

> > it just makes one nuts, some have tried to tell to stay away

from

> > them, but God love him, he hates the crap they speak. And, I

contacted

> > the ring leader about helping us with 's case, the little

boy

> > who was brutalized under the guise of " restraint. " One would thing

> > that a ND would want to jump on the bandwagon of helping a 45lb, 9

> > yr-old size of 5 yr-old boy who is essentially non-verbal. I've

not

> > heard a thing from anyone in that crowd.

> >

> > I think the silence of the ND group speaks volumes.

> >

> > Debi

> >

>

[Guest guest]

-I agree on some of these NDers, however I strongly suspect there are

these " self Diagnosed " whom are just trying to find an excuse for

thier horrible choices/behavior,and lack of productivity.

-- In EOHarm , " schaferatsprynet " <schafer@...> wrote:

>

>

> The raison d'être of the NDers is to react in opposition to parents

of

> autistic children and not the challenge the status quo. The guise

is

> that they are doing it for the noble protection of oppressed

autistic

> children. But based on my advanced Google degree in psychology, I

> would venture that they are only acting out against perceived

injuries

> from own hated parents. This makes sense since autism is purely

> genetic, right? Mom and dad are the cause for their unhappiness,

not

> vaccines. Can't let mom and dad off the hook, can they?

>

> Lenny

>

> p.s. For those of you with a public education, " raison d'être " is

> " reason for existing " in Canadian. " Status quo " is an Italian movie

> about chariots.

>

>

>

> >

> > My op, the ND crowd should be iggied. By spending time on their

sites,

> > it just makes one nuts, some have tried to tell to stay away

from

> > them, but God love him, he hates the crap they speak. And, I

contacted

> > the ring leader about helping us with 's case, the little

boy

> > who was brutalized under the guise of " restraint. " One would thing

> > that a ND would want to jump on the bandwagon of helping a 45lb, 9

> > yr-old size of 5 yr-old boy who is essentially non-verbal. I've

not

> > heard a thing from anyone in that crowd.

> >

> > I think the silence of the ND group speaks volumes.

> >

> > Debi

> >

>