Guest guest Posted January 20, 2008 Report Share Posted January 20, 2008 Like I mentioned last week, up to December, 2006 at least, the NIMH site on autism listed investigations into " psychosurgery " (ice-pick lobotomy by any other name...) as a prospective " treatment " for autism. I believe this reference has been removed from the current version of the site, when recommendations for Zyprexa were exchanged for Risperdal. Point being, removing the reference doesn't mean it's not still being investigated. VERACARE <veracare@...> wrote: From: " VERACARE " <veracare@...> " Infomail1ahrp (DOT) org " <Infomail1@...> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:43:36 -0500 CC: Subject: PBS: The Lobotomist_The Damage When Medicine Goes Awry_Jan. 21 ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION Promoting Openness, Full Disclosure and Accountability http://www.ahrp.org and http://ahrp.blogspot.com FYI On Monday, Jan. 21, at 9:00 PM, Public Broadcasting stations will be airing The LOBOTOMIST, a riveting documentary on the American experience based on the 2005 biography of Walter Freeman, who performed ice pick lobotomies on more than 2,900 people, the last lobotomy in 1967. The Washington Post reports (below) that hour-long " American Experience " documentary " The Lobotomist " makes clear that Freeman's operation reflected the neurologist's peculiar combination of zealotry, talent, hubris and, as one of his trainees noted, craziness. Sometimes Freeman, who relished putting on a show, used a carpenter's mallet instead of a surgical hammer during demonstrations of his operation. At other times, he would operate left-handed rather than right-handed. The same can be said about the proponents of ElectroShock, and psychiatry's other brain damaging somatic interventions, including: Magnetic Seizure Therapy (MST), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Vagus Nerve Stimulation (TMS), Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS). None of these invasive interventions is supported by scientific evidence of safety or lasting efficacy. Psychiatry's increasingly toxic pharmacologic treatments also lack scientific evidence of safety and efficacy to justify their wide use; yet they have become industry's blockbuster profit-makers thanks to aggressive marketing and a complicit FDA. Most disturbing is that each of these brain damaging experimental treatments became fashionable due to the propaganda spread by its coterie of zealous proponents whose hubris, positions of authority and financial stakes, led to their acceptance. FDA officials abdicate the agency's mission by turning a blind eye and deaf ear to fraudulent promotional claims refuted by the scientific data buried within FDA's files. Those who expose their patients to harm-producing interventions violate the Hippocratic Oath-- " First, do no harm. " In the absence of scientifically valid evidence-based medicine; in the absence of mandatory monitoring and reporting of drug and/or device adverse effects, to determine safety--it is better to do nothing. Contact: Vera Hassner Sharav veracare@... 212-595-8974 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp- dyn/content/article/2008/01/14/AR2008011401 484.html THE WASHINGTON POST 'Lobotomist' Serves as a Warning Documentary Shows Damage Done When Medicine Goes Awry By G. Boodman Tuesday, January 15, 2008; Page HE01 One of the most horrifying medical treatments of the 20th century was carried out not clandestinely, but with the approval of the medical establishment, the media and the public. Known as the transorbital or " ice pick " lobotomy, the crude and destructive brain-scrambling operation performed on thousands of psychiatric patients between the 1930s and 1960s was touted as a cure for mental illness. Walter J. Freeman performs a lobotomy in 1949. The surgery aimed to cure mental illness. This Story * 'Lobotomist' Serves as a Warning 58.html> * 'I Wasn't Sick or Crazy. I Was Simply Impossible to Control.' 1481.html> * 'The Lobotomist' 89.html> Its prosaic name comes from the instrument initially used to perform it: an ice pick plucked from the kitchen drawer of the procedure's tireless proselytizer, Walter J. Freeman, who pioneered the operation in 1936 while at Washington University Hospital. The story of how Freeman sold his procedure to credulous colleagues, assiduously courted the press and convinced desperate families that sticking an ice pick through a patient's upper eye sockets and twirling it like a swizzle stick through brain matter would cure psychosis, depression or troublesome behavior is the ultimate in cautionary medical tales. As the riveting hour-long " American Experience " documentary " The Lobotomist " (scheduled to air Jan. 21 at 9 p.m. on WETA and other PBS stations) makes clear, Freeman's operation reflected the neurologist's peculiar combination of zealotry, talent, hubris and, as one of his trainees noted, craziness. Sometimes Freeman, who relished putting on a show, used a carpenter's mallet instead of a surgical hammer during demonstrations of his operation. At other times, he would operate left-handed rather than right-handed. Based in part on the much-praised 2005 biography " The Lobotomist " by medical writer Jack El-Hai, who appears in the film and served as a consultant, the film by Barak Goodman and Maggio features chilling black-and- white home movies as well as haunting photographs of patients before and sometimes after their lobotomies. Many of the movies are narrated by a gravel- voiced Freeman demonstrating the procedure he performed on more than 2,900 people, the youngest of whom was 4. As the filmmakers note, lobotomy flourished in a therapeutic vacuum: Until the mid-1950s when the groundbreaking tranquilizer Thorazine swept through mental hospitals, ushering in the era of psychopharmacology, medicine had virtually nothing to offer psychiatric patients. State hospitals were teeming, squalid warehouses that had become permanent homes to thousands who had little hope of ever leaving. One of the most notorious was Washington's St. s Hospital, where Freeman began his career in the 1920s and was struck by the sight of 5,000 patients " whose lives were going nowhere, would go nowhere, " in the words of El-Hai. The solution, Freeman believed, lay in a radical experimental procedure invented by a Portuguese neurologist who in 1949 would win the Nobel Prize in medicine. He claimed the drastic brain operation had cured a substantial number of people with mental illness. The scion of a distinguished Philadelphia medical family who had a burning desire for fame, Freeman began experimenting and developed the ice pick procedure. His operation severed the frontal lobe from the thalamus, the repository of emotions and the site where Freeman believed mental illness originated. A few patients and their families claimed lobotomy was beneficial, especially in reducing agitation, which was Freeman's measure of success. But others died on the table or were left irreparably damaged: childlike, docile, vacant and incontinent. Among them was Rosemary Kennedy, the 23-year-old mildly retarded sister of F. Kennedy, who spent 56 years of her life in an institution after Freeman operated on her in 1941. Undaunted by his failures, Freeman's pitch that lobotomy cured mental illness was seized on by the press -- the Washington Star called it among " the greatest innovations of this generation, " and the New York Times pronounced it " history-making. " Many doctors embraced it as a 10- minute operation that promised to empty mental hospitals and return patients to their families. Opponents, mostly psychiatrists who practiced Freudian talk therapy, didn't matter much: In those days public criticism of a doctor by his peers was regarded as unethical. By the early 1960s lobotomy had fallen out of favor, in part because of its low success rate and the disastrous harm it inflicted on many patients. Freeman, who died in 1972, performed his last lobotomy in 1967; his privileges at Herrick Hospital in Berkeley, Calif., were revoked after the patient died. While several of his relatives appear on camera, one of the most affecting interviews is with Berkeley bus driver Dully, who was lobotomized by Freeman at age 12 after his stepmother complained he was difficult. The issue at the heart of this powerful and unsettling film is not, as one writer puts it, " how a man could go off the rails, but how science could go off the rails. " It's a question well worth pondering. ¿ Comments:boodmans@... . FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.