Guest guest Posted January 27, 2008 Report Share Posted January 27, 2008 http://abc.go.com/primetime/elistone/index?pn=index It’s a 7 min clip from the show. Near the end you see the mom talking about suing over the vaccines. What’s weird is they use the term Mercurical (or something like that) not Thimerosal. I don’t know if that’s made up or not. I couldn’t rewind the clip, but it didn’t sound like Thimerosal. Someone please correct me if I’m wrong. Thanks, - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 27, 2008 Report Share Posted January 27, 2008 Hi ,Yeah, it's a fictionalized version of Thimerosal called "Mercuritol"Here's a link....these peds are just relentless and never miss an opportunity to perpetuate their lies:http://pediatrics.about.com/od/pediatricsglossary/g/0108_mercuritol.htmOn Jan 27, 2008, at 11:40 AM, christine wrote: http://abc.go.com/primetime/elistone/index?pn=index It’s a 7 min clip from the show. Near the end you see the mom talking about suing over the vaccines. What’s weird is they use the term Mercurical (or something like that) not Thimerosal. I don’t know if that’s made up or not. I couldn’t rewind the clip, but it didn’t sound like Thimerosal. Someone please correct me if I’m wrong. Thanks, - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 27, 2008 Report Share Posted January 27, 2008 No, you are correct, they said, "Mercuritol." Probably to keep from being sued.Peace,Kathy E.On Jan 27, 2008, at 2:40 PM, christine wrote:What’s weird is they use the term Mercurical (or something like that) not Thimerosal. I don’t know if that’s made up or not. I couldn’t rewind the clip, but it didn’t sound like Thimerosal. Someone please correct me if I’m wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 27, 2008 Report Share Posted January 27, 2008 Actually, the pediatrics piece was indeed mostly factual. Definition: Mercuritol is a make-believe or fictional substance that the lawyer in the legal TV drama " Eli Stone " says caused the title character's son to have autism. Mercuritol is supposed to be a mercury-based vaccine preservative and so some parents may confuse it with thimerosal, a real mercury-based preservative that was used in vaccines. Although there was no evidence that thimerosal was actually harmful or causes autism, it was removed from most childhood vaccines in 2001. Mercuritol is indeed a fictional substance. Thimerosal is a real mercury-based preservative that was used in vaccines. Thimerosal was removed from most childhood vaccines in its function as a preservative (which is how it was defined here) in 2001 (albeit in lots begun in 2001). The only part that is problematic is the " no evidence " bit. Is it strictly a lie if the person who states something actually believes it to be true? Sure it is still a false statement, but is it a lie? Too many people in positions of media, medicine and public policy are ill-informed and naive in trusting those who are the puppets for the Corp interests. Clinton supported the was, now she says she doesn't support the war. What does that make her? A Liar, a Fool, what? Unlike many people, I believe the conspiracy concerning thimerosal is much, much smaller, just a handful of people in all the right places. The rest are just fools who trust those in charge. Good little Nazis, right? > > > http://abc.go.com/primetime/elistone/index?pn=index > > > > It's a 7 min clip from the show. Near the end you see the mom > > talking about suing over the vaccines. > > > > What's weird is they use the term Mercurical (or something like > > that) not Thimerosal. I don't know if that's made up or not. I > > couldn't rewind the clip, but it didn't sound like Thimerosal. > > Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. > > > > Thanks, > > > > - > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 27, 2008 Report Share Posted January 27, 2008 On Jan 27, 2008, at 1:37 PM, dad_4_kids wrote:The only part that is problematic is the "no evidence" bit.That's primarily the part to which I was referring, and I personally find it much more than "problematic". Is it strictly a lie if the person who states something actually believes it to be true? Sure it is still a false statement, but is it a lie? So these peds are either evil or they are stupid....either way, that's no excuse for perpetuating "misinformation" (is that a better term?), and I will never let any of them near my child again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 27, 2008 Report Share Posted January 27, 2008 Call it negligence (legally liable negligence). They owe a high duty of care to their patients. If they don't know, they SHOULD know. You can't dig your head in the stand. The way the system is set up, however, allows them to do so. --- cathylynn2 <cathybuckley@...> wrote: > > On Jan 27, 2008, at 1:37 PM, dad_4_kids wrote: > > > The only part that is problematic is the " no > evidence " bit. > > That's primarily the part to which I was referring, > and I personally > find it much more than " problematic " . > > > > Is it strictly a lie if the person who states > something actually > > believes it to be true? Sure it is still a false > statement, but is > > it a lie? > > So these peds are either evil or they are > stupid....either way, > that's no excuse for perpetuating " misinformation " > (is that a better > term?), and I will never let any of them near my > child again. > > ________________________________________________________________________________\ ____ Never miss a thing. Make your home page. http://www./r/hs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 27, 2008 Report Share Posted January 27, 2008 They called it Mercuritol. They intentionally gave it a fictional name Kerrie In a message dated 1/27/2008 2:39:15 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, christine@... writes: http://abc.go.com/primetime/elistone/index?pn=indexIt’s a 7 min clip from the show. Near the end you see the mom talking about suing over the vaccines.What’s weird is they use the term Mercurical (or something like that) not Thimerosal. I don’t know if that’s made up or not. I couldn’t rewind the clip, but it didn’t sound like Thimerosal. Someone please correct me if I’m wrong. Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape in the new year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 28, 2008 Report Share Posted January 28, 2008 They likely had to, to placate/kowtow to Eli Lilly, GSK, and Sanofi-Pasteur who have given ABC over 130 million in advertising dollars in the last year, even though few if any vaccines were ever advertised on ABC. One can read more here, at: http://www.thechronicleherald.ca/Living/1034258.html . Aasaratlenhum@... wrote: They called it Mercuritol. They intentionally gave it a fictional name Kerrie In a message dated 1/27/2008 2:39:15 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, christinelighthousestudios (DOT) info writes: http://abc.go.com/primetime/elistone/index?pn=indexIt’s a 7 min clip from the show. Near the end you see the mom talking about suing over the vaccines.What’s weird is they use the term Mercurical (or something like that) not Thimerosal. I don’t know if that’s made up or not. I couldn’t rewind the clip, but it didn’t sound like Thimerosal. Someone please correct me if I’m wrong. Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape in the new year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 28, 2008 Report Share Posted January 28, 2008 Very funny point (not ha ha funny but mysterious funny). I guess ABC is afraid of law suits from Eli Lilly. Wait a minute---eli lilly, eli stone---connection? Ok, very little sleep here and it is showing. Thanks for the clip of the show . A corporate lawyer with a moral soul? Totally fiction but watchable. Tina > > > They called it Mercuritol. They intentionally gave it a fictional name > > > Kerrie > > In a message dated 1/27/2008 2:39:15 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, > christine@... writes: > > _http://abc.go.com/primetime/elistone/index?pn=index_ > (http://abc.go.com/primetime/elistone/index?pn=index) > > It’s a 7 min clip from the show. Near the end you see the mom talking about > suing over the vaccines. > > What’s weird is they use the term Mercurical (or something like that) not > Thimerosal. I don’t know if that’s made up or not. I couldn’t rewind the > clip, but it didn’t sound like Thimerosal. Someone please correct me if I’m > wrong. > > > > > > > **************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape. > http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise? NCID=aolcmp00300000002489 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 28, 2008 Report Share Posted January 28, 2008 Mer-cure-it-all - very good! I used to use mercurichrome on my cuts as a kid. Remember that orange stuff with glass stick in the top? Sigh.... Funny how AAP came out against censorhip of the airwaves in 1989 when it was rock music in discussion. " The AAP is against censorship! " As my mutha would say, " Shoo-ah! " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2008 Report Share Posted January 29, 2008 - LOL Kim! Yes they think it mer- cure-it-al How do we know they don't throw in xtra in the lab to cover unsanitary condition?-- In EOHarm , " krstagliano " <KRStagliano@...> wrote: > > Mer-cure-it-all - very good! I used to use mercurichrome on my cuts as > a kid. Remember that orange stuff with glass stick in the top? Sigh.... > > Funny how AAP came out against censorhip of the airwaves in 1989 when > it was rock music in discussion. " The AAP is against censorship! " As > my mutha would say, " Shoo-ah! " > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.