Guest guest Posted February 2, 2008 Report Share Posted February 2, 2008 I know the NYT relies on Pharma ad dollars to meet payroll and turn a profit in a shrinking old media world, but this is ridiculous. The head of the AAP makes a gigantic factual error in her press release - saying there is no mercury in recommended vaccines - but that error is unquestioned in print - she gets a pass, and THIS is the editoral? Note that the Times clearly noticed her error: see " almost all " . Editorial Eli Stone's Overleap of Faith http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/02/opinion/02sat4.html?ref=opinion Published: February 2, 2008 You can't help rooting for Eli Stone, the young corporate attorney who has decided to go to bat for the little guy (after a " Faith " - singing appears in his living room) in ABC's new series that bears his name. Unfortunately, on his first try, Mr. Stone — even with Mr. singing backup and the spiritual insights attributed to an inoperable brain aneurysm — chose the wrong cause to champion and sent the wrong message to parents about the safety of vaccines. In Thursday's opening show, Mr. Stone, an associate at a high-powered law firm, suddenly switches sides — from representing a vaccine manufacturer to representing a mother who believes her son contracted autism from a mercury preservative in the company's influenza vaccine. Many parents of autistic children believe that, mostly because autism becomes manifest at the same early ages that pediatric vaccines are administered. Never mind that such authoritative bodies as the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization have found no evidence of a causal link. Never mind that the incidence of autism continued to rise even after mercury preservatives were phased out of almost all childhood vaccines. As far as Eli Stone is concerned, you can't just rely on science. Sometimes you have to go on faith. A jury buys the argument, especially after the company's chief executive admits that he wouldn't let his own child take the vaccine. The winsome, courageous mother and her minimally impaired son are awarded $5.2 million to teach a lesson to the arrogant, smug corporate world. The American Academy of Pediatrics tried unsuccessfully to get the episode canceled, fearing that it could deter parents from getting their children vaccinated, exposing them to far greater dangers from disease. Let's hope that any parents who watched don't make that mistake. And let's hope that in future episodes, Eli Stone and ABC show better judgment in picking causes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.