Guest guest Posted February 22, 2008 Report Share Posted February 22, 2008 I remember this part in December " Previously, the Court had granted Wyeth's motion to preclude all five of plaintiffs' expert witnesses from offering testimony at trial following extensive briefing and a 10-day evidentiary hearing held by the Court last August. " I guess its the final verdict. Anyone doing anything about this corruption of the legal process? Sheri > >Wyeth Wins Thimerosal-Autism Case in land Court > >MADISON, N.J., February 19, 2008 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Wyeth >announced today that The Honorable Stuart R. Berger of the Circuit >Court for Baltimore City in Baltimore, land, has granted Wyeth's >motion for summary judgment in the case of Blackwell, et al. v. Sigma >Aldrich, Inc., et al -- an alleged vaccine injury case claiming that >Jamarr Blackwell's exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccines caused >him to become autistic. > >Previously, the Court had granted Wyeth's motion to preclude all five >of plaintiffs' expert witnesses from offering testimony at trial >following extensive briefing and a 10-day evidentiary hearing held by >the Court last August. > >In his December 21, 2007 Memorandum and Order pertaining to Wyeth's >evidentiary motion, Judge Berger found that " it is generally accepted >in the relevant scientific community that thimerosal in vaccines does >not cause or contribute to neurodevelopmental disorders such as >autism, " also noting that " it is generally accepted in the relevant >scientific community that autism is genetic in origin except in rare >instances of prenatal exposures to certain substances at defined >periods during pregnancy. " > > " This is a significant victory for good science generally, " says > J. ch, a partner at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, >who served as lead counsel for Wyeth in this matter. " The Court >appropriately found that plaintiffs' attempt to link autism to >childhood vaccines is contrary to generally accepted science. " > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 22, 2008 Report Share Posted February 22, 2008 ---we should have listened to J.B.or atleast organized a rally at the courthouse demanding the judge hear both sides of the case. Now they will be trying to use this as a precedent. Wonder where the judge will spend his$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ In EOHarm , " Elsass " <elsass@...> wrote: > > I have a pdf file of the judge's full decision- if anyone wants it, > email me privately & I'll pass it on. TO sum up, he slams the Geiers > and while he doesn't so much slam Haley & the others, he faults them > for not being experts in things such as epidemiology...because he > bases his whole decision on the IOM report & the consensus of the > scientific community. It's pure BS. > > > > > > I apologize if someone posted this already.....I didn't recall > seeing it. > > > > > > > > Wyeth Wins Thimerosal-Autism Case in land Court > > > > MADISON, N.J., February 19, 2008 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Wyeth > > announced today that The Honorable Stuart R. Berger of the Circuit > > Court for Baltimore City in Baltimore, land, has granted Wyeth's > > motion for summary judgment in the case of Blackwell, et al. v. > Sigma > > Aldrich, Inc., et al -- an alleged vaccine injury case claiming that > > Jamarr Blackwell's exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccines caused > > him to become autistic. > > > > Previously, the Court had granted Wyeth's motion to preclude all > five > > of plaintiffs' expert witnesses from offering testimony at trial > > following extensive briefing and a 10-day evidentiary hearing held > by > > the Court last August. > > > > In his December 21, 2007 Memorandum and Order pertaining to Wyeth's > > evidentiary motion, Judge Berger found that " it is generally > accepted > > in the relevant scientific community that thimerosal in vaccines > does > > not cause or contribute to neurodevelopmental disorders such as > > autism, " also noting that " it is generally accepted in the relevant > > scientific community that autism is genetic in origin except in rare > > instances of prenatal exposures to certain substances at defined > > periods during pregnancy. " > > > > " This is a significant victory for good science generally, " says > > J. ch, a partner at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, > > who served as lead counsel for Wyeth in this matter. " The Court > > appropriately found that plaintiffs' attempt to link autism to > > childhood vaccines is contrary to generally accepted science. " > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 22, 2008 Report Share Posted February 22, 2008 Remember, initially the tobacco cases were lost, too. I say don't give up, the truth shall come to light. Debi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2008 Report Share Posted March 2, 2008 (This is a press release from Wyeth) Wyeth wins thimerosal-autism case in land court MADISON, New Jersey - Wyeth (NYSE: WYE) announced today that Wyeth’s motion for summary judgment in the case of Blackwell, et al. v. Sigma Aldrich, Inc., et al was granted - an alleged vaccine injury case claiming that Jamarr Blackwell’s exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccines caused him to become autistic. Previously, the Court had granted Wyeth’s motion to preclude all five of plaintiffs’ expert witnesses from offering testimony at trial following extensive briefing and a 10-day evidentiary hearing held by the Court last August. In his December 21, 2007 Memorandum and Order pertaining to Wyeth’s evidentiary motion, Judge Berger found that " it is generally accepted in the relevant scientific community that thimerosal in vaccines does not cause or contribute to neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism, " also noting that " it is generally accepted in the relevant scientific community that autism is genetic in origin except in rare instances of prenatal exposures to certain substances at defined periods during pregnancy. " " This is a significant victory for good science generally,†says J. ch, a partner at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, who served as lead counsel for Wyeth in this matter. “The Court appropriately found that plaintiff’s attempt to link autism to childhood vaccines is contrary to generally accepted science. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2008 Report Share Posted March 3, 2008 Some of you autism groups, can we pay into a legal fund for these parents to appeal? We really need to start supporting those willing to fight for the cause. Debi - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.