WIll Baltimore Judge's Wyeth decision now be overturned?

[Guest guest]

I know the attorney in this Wyeth case that was dismissed

without trial by a City Court Judge in Baltimore.

I will try to find out what the appeal process will be.

DK

“On Dec. 21, Judge Berger found that

" it is generally accepted in the relevant scientific community that

thimerosal in vaccines does not cause or contribute to neurodevelopmental

disorders such as autism, " and noted that " it is generally accepted

in the relevant scientific community that autism is genetic in origin except in

rare instances of prenatal exposures to certain substances at defined periods

during pregnancy. "

PS: More private suits in civil court are

coming, based on the aggravated mito hypothesis, and they will not be required

to go through VICP first.

I doubt that very many juries will be

convinced to, essentially, overturn the same decision as that made by senior

medical personnel at the US Department of Health and Human Services, and deny

compensation to an ASD child with a proven underlying Mito disorder, who fell

ill and regressed shortly after vaccination, just like Hannah Poling did.

The Feds NEVER should have conceded this

case. It’s beyond me why they did, they should have seen this coming. I

bet Pharma is furious with the AG’s office right now.

And if anyone asks you why the family

attorneys agreed to settle the Poling case, tell them they don’t know the

first thing about Vaccine Court. A claim for injuries is presented to the court,

with documentation. HHS can then agree to pay out compensation (a “concession”

in essence) or take the case to an administrative hearing and fight it.

In this case, HHS agreed to pay out

compensation and there was no need to go to a hearing. The Polings could not

reject the compensation agreement and insist on a hearing if they wanted to.

This was supposed to be a test case. But the government did not want this to go

to a hearing, not the Polings. But the family had no choice. Someone please

correct me if I am wrong, but when you apply for VICP compensation, and you

receive it, it’s pretty much take-it-or-leave-it at that point, very much

unlike a regular civil lawsuit that might get a settlement “offer.”

That is why the NY Times headline today about

an autism “deal” was so misleading. There was no deal. Let’s

make that clear.

DK