what do you think of my come back on the aljc website the writing is terrible

[Guest guest]

By joe harris March 21, 2008 7:06 PM | Link to this Margaret Romao Toigo the science you quote as a very large body of scientific evidence Seems to be shrinking, verstreaten for example his earlier work you know before he was hired by GSK found a link, then he left to go to GSK his work was changed 5 times to nothing but ticks, his work was put in the journal of ped. even with a conflict of interest imagine that, is this not why Wakefield is fighting for his career with the GMC. when Vestreaten thought he was going to be brought back to the U.S. he admitted he did not find a positive or a negative he found a neutral. so at best you have nothing with him one down. next is Denmark you see we have through the FOIA act a

woman from CDC saying they have searched frantically and there’s nothing in the U.S. that supports them, they will need to go over seas to Denmark. And that is what they did they bought the best that your tax dollars could buy not science but lies Anders hivid came here and told the biggest bull sh##t you ever heard about the numbers going up when removing thimerosal incidentally the the Denmark Gov. has not put it back in. If it was protecting children from autism you would think they would, change their mind about taking it out. we have a email from Denmark saying the incidence of autism and prevalence there of continue to decline. So we should be asking the CDC why the sentence before an after her statement of decline was blacked out. You see if you have not figured out by now the CDC lies more than it tells the truth. Another study the miller study from the U.K. was so screwed up she asked if she has to give back the money. so far nothing but fraud, now for the grand

finally the 2004 prestigious IOM ruling I hate to break it to you but science had nothing to do with their decision they were ordered not to find causation we know this because of the FOIA act it seem this saves our a* a lot from a crooked agency such as the CDC sorry, I am wrong IOM is not a Government agency it does not apply some one there leaked the minutes I'm assuming they were frightened at the thought of more children being poisoned and that they needed to take action. This is what was said Dr. McCormick, for example, in speaking of the CDC, noted that the agency “wants us to declare, well, these things are pretty safe on a population basis then later she said Walter orinstin wants this and what Walt wants Walt generally gets so much for all that very large body of scientific evidence. can you say stacking the deck. Seems they don’t know how to play fair. This was also said “We’ve got a dragon by the tail here,” states a committee member in the transcript. “At the

end of the line, what we know is - and I agree - that the more negative that presentation [the report] is, the less likely people are to use vaccination, immunization, and we know what the results of that will be. We are kind of caught in a trap. How we work our way out of the trap, I think, is the charge.” I just don’t think they thought about the opposite side of that coin is they will be poisoning more children, to keep a already failing vaccine program propped up can you say terrorist, Byron child magazine heard that it was in their contract with the CDC an IOM not to find a link MMR or Thimerosal this is what they were told: When byronchild asked CDC spokesperson Curtis for a copy of the contract that would detail the agreement between the IOM and the CDC, stated that the contract would be available only in a heavily “redacted” or blacked-out format. It seems they the CDC uses that method blacked out format more than the military the CDC uses

it for covering up lies The IOM stated “no comment” to byronchild about the leaked transcript or its use in the pending civil court case. Boy your large body of evidence Ian’t so large any more Huh!