Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: I'd Like Your Opinion on Our Test Results

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

I'm not sure what type of test that is (IGG or IGM), but if you have

high CMV titers (especially IGM) I would consider starting Valtrex,

yes. And if you didn't and felt you had a viral kid, I still would

do it. My son didn't test posative before, during, or after. Like

with MB12, I think a short trial will tell you if it is going to

help.

- Stan

>

>

> Stan and Others -

>

> I have 5 year old twins who are both vaccine damaged (one PDD, one

SID).

> We have been doing biomedical for a little over 2 years (GFCF and

> typical supps). We have been chelating for almost 10 months with

great

> results (TD-DMPS alone for 5 months, then TD-ALA along with it,

for the

> last 5 months). In the beginning, both boys did a handful of

> homepathic remedies, many of which were geared to help the body

clear

> viruses from the vaccines (they had relatively high titers). Both

boys

> got rashes and had regressions for about a month. Then, about 18

months

> ago, the doc introduced new ones, supposedly more effective, but

with

> the same goal. Again, we had about a month-long regression, but

this

> time no rash. Both times the boys came out of it much improved,

but it

> was very rocky during the regression. We took those for about a

year

> and stopped (switched doctors).

>

> We have recently retested immune function, titers and viruses. I

was

> hoping you could take a look at these and see if you think my kids

could

> benefit from Valtrex. Here are the results:

>

> Twin #1

2

> Years Ago Recent

>

> CD4 Absolute High

20.20

> Not Tested IgG Total

> 506 (Ref 592 - 1723) 655

> Hep

B

> Nonreactive Nonreactive

> Rubella

> Immune 2.9

(>1.1

> ref) Rubeola

> 2.48 (>1.09 ref) 1.83

>

Polio

> 1:32, 1:128, 1:128 (Ref 1:8) 1:8,1:128, 1:8

>

> Twin #2

2

> Years Ago Recent

>

> CD4 Absolute High

21.20

> Not Tested IgG

> 518 (Ref 592 - 1723 638

> Hep

B

> Nonreactive Nonreactive

>

Rubella

> Immune 2.19

(>1.1

> ref) Rubeola

> 2.59 (>1.1 ref) 1.45

> Polio

> 1:128, 1:128, 1:8 (ref 1:8) 1:32, 1:128, 1:8

>

> The boys tested negative to HHV6, Epstein Barr, and Herpes 1 and

2.

> They tested positive to CMV, though. On the ones I can compare, it

> looks like titers have improved. What do think about them showing

> nonreactive to Hep B? Anyway, do you think it looks like they are

still

> candidates for viral treatment? My DAN seems to think that

naturals

> don't work. I tried OLE in the beginning, but I couldn't get them

to

> take it (bad taste). Incidentally, my NT son's tests look almost

> exactly the same. Do you think the homeopathics did enough, or

does it

> look I still need to address the viruses? Finally, I'd love to

hear

> more about people who are chelating at the same time as using

Valtrex.

>

> Thanks for sticking it out to the end of this post, and thanks for

your

> help.

>

> Ruth

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I'm not sure what type of test that is (IGG or IGM), but if you have

high CMV titers (especially IGM) I would consider starting Valtrex,

yes. And if you didn't and felt you had a viral kid, I still would

do it. My son didn't test posative before, during, or after. Like

with MB12, I think a short trial will tell you if it is going to

help.

- Stan

>

>

> Stan and Others -

>

> I have 5 year old twins who are both vaccine damaged (one PDD, one

SID).

> We have been doing biomedical for a little over 2 years (GFCF and

> typical supps). We have been chelating for almost 10 months with

great

> results (TD-DMPS alone for 5 months, then TD-ALA along with it,

for the

> last 5 months). In the beginning, both boys did a handful of

> homepathic remedies, many of which were geared to help the body

clear

> viruses from the vaccines (they had relatively high titers). Both

boys

> got rashes and had regressions for about a month. Then, about 18

months

> ago, the doc introduced new ones, supposedly more effective, but

with

> the same goal. Again, we had about a month-long regression, but

this

> time no rash. Both times the boys came out of it much improved,

but it

> was very rocky during the regression. We took those for about a

year

> and stopped (switched doctors).

>

> We have recently retested immune function, titers and viruses. I

was

> hoping you could take a look at these and see if you think my kids

could

> benefit from Valtrex. Here are the results:

>

> Twin #1

2

> Years Ago Recent

>

> CD4 Absolute High

20.20

> Not Tested IgG Total

> 506 (Ref 592 - 1723) 655

> Hep

B

> Nonreactive Nonreactive

> Rubella

> Immune 2.9

(>1.1

> ref) Rubeola

> 2.48 (>1.09 ref) 1.83

>

Polio

> 1:32, 1:128, 1:128 (Ref 1:8) 1:8,1:128, 1:8

>

> Twin #2

2

> Years Ago Recent

>

> CD4 Absolute High

21.20

> Not Tested IgG

> 518 (Ref 592 - 1723 638

> Hep

B

> Nonreactive Nonreactive

>

Rubella

> Immune 2.19

(>1.1

> ref) Rubeola

> 2.59 (>1.1 ref) 1.45

> Polio

> 1:128, 1:128, 1:8 (ref 1:8) 1:32, 1:128, 1:8

>

> The boys tested negative to HHV6, Epstein Barr, and Herpes 1 and

2.

> They tested positive to CMV, though. On the ones I can compare, it

> looks like titers have improved. What do think about them showing

> nonreactive to Hep B? Anyway, do you think it looks like they are

still

> candidates for viral treatment? My DAN seems to think that

naturals

> don't work. I tried OLE in the beginning, but I couldn't get them

to

> take it (bad taste). Incidentally, my NT son's tests look almost

> exactly the same. Do you think the homeopathics did enough, or

does it

> look I still need to address the viruses? Finally, I'd love to

hear

> more about people who are chelating at the same time as using

Valtrex.

>

> Thanks for sticking it out to the end of this post, and thanks for

your

> help.

>

> Ruth

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

It is IGG. I just relooked at the tests, though, and found one twin also has an IGG positive to HHV6. But, he wasn't positive 2 years ago. Would you use Valtrex on a child that isn't on the spectrum? Stan Kurtz <kurtzstan@...> wrote: I'm not sure what type of test that is (IGG or IGM), but if you have high CMV titers (especially IGM) I would consider starting Valtrex, yes. And if you didn't and felt you had a viral kid, I still would do it. My son didn't test posative before, during, or after. Like with MB12, I think a short trial will tell you if it is going to help.- Stan>> > Stan and Others -> > I have 5 year old twins who are

both vaccine damaged (one PDD, one SID).> We have been doing biomedical for a little over 2 years (GFCF and> typical supps). We have been chelating for almost 10 months with great> results (TD-DMPS alone for 5 months, then TD-ALA along with it, for the> last 5 months). In the beginning, both boys did a handful of> homepathic remedies, many of which were geared to help the body clear> viruses from the vaccines (they had relatively high titers). Both boys> got rashes and had regressions for about a month. Then, about 18 months> ago, the doc introduced new ones, supposedly more effective, but with> the same goal. Again, we had about a month-long regression, but this> time no rash. Both times the boys came out of it much improved, but it> was very rocky during the regression. We took those for about a year> and

stopped (switched doctors).> > We have recently retested immune function, titers and viruses. I was> hoping you could take a look at these and see if you think my kids could> benefit from Valtrex. Here are the results:> > Twin #1 2> Years Ago Recent> > CD4

Absolute High 20.20> Not Tested IgG Total> 506 (Ref 592 - 1723) 655> Hep

B > Nonreactive Nonreactive>

Rubella > Immune 2.9 (>1.1> ref) Rubeola> 2.48 (>1.09

ref) 1.83> Polio > 1:32, 1:128, 1:128 (Ref 1:8) 1:8,1:128, 1:8> > Twin

#2 2> Years Ago Recent> > CD4 Absolute High

21.20> Not Tested IgG> 518 (Ref 592 - 1723 638> Hep B >

Nonreactive Nonreactive> Rubella >

Immune 2.19 (>1.1> ref) Rubeola> 2.59 (>1.1 ref) 1.45> Polio> 1:128, 1:128, 1:8 (ref 1:8) 1:32, 1:128, 1:8> > The boys tested negative to HHV6, Epstein Barr, and Herpes 1

and 2. > They tested positive to CMV, though. On the ones I can compare, it> looks like titers have improved. What do think about them showing> nonreactive to Hep B? Anyway, do you think it looks like they are still> candidates for viral treatment? My DAN seems to think that naturals> don't work. I tried OLE in the beginning, but I couldn't get them to> take it (bad taste). Incidentally, my NT son's tests look almost> exactly the same. Do you think the homeopathics did enough, or does it> look I still need to address the viruses? Finally, I'd love to hear> more about people who are chelating at the same time as using Valtrex.> > Thanks for sticking it out to the end of this post, and thanks for your> help.> > Ruth>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

It is IGG. I just relooked at the tests, though, and found one twin also has an IGG positive to HHV6. But, he wasn't positive 2 years ago. Would you use Valtrex on a child that isn't on the spectrum? Stan Kurtz <kurtzstan@...> wrote: I'm not sure what type of test that is (IGG or IGM), but if you have high CMV titers (especially IGM) I would consider starting Valtrex, yes. And if you didn't and felt you had a viral kid, I still would do it. My son didn't test posative before, during, or after. Like with MB12, I think a short trial will tell you if it is going to help.- Stan>> > Stan and Others -> > I have 5 year old twins who are

both vaccine damaged (one PDD, one SID).> We have been doing biomedical for a little over 2 years (GFCF and> typical supps). We have been chelating for almost 10 months with great> results (TD-DMPS alone for 5 months, then TD-ALA along with it, for the> last 5 months). In the beginning, both boys did a handful of> homepathic remedies, many of which were geared to help the body clear> viruses from the vaccines (they had relatively high titers). Both boys> got rashes and had regressions for about a month. Then, about 18 months> ago, the doc introduced new ones, supposedly more effective, but with> the same goal. Again, we had about a month-long regression, but this> time no rash. Both times the boys came out of it much improved, but it> was very rocky during the regression. We took those for about a year> and

stopped (switched doctors).> > We have recently retested immune function, titers and viruses. I was> hoping you could take a look at these and see if you think my kids could> benefit from Valtrex. Here are the results:> > Twin #1 2> Years Ago Recent> > CD4

Absolute High 20.20> Not Tested IgG Total> 506 (Ref 592 - 1723) 655> Hep

B > Nonreactive Nonreactive>

Rubella > Immune 2.9 (>1.1> ref) Rubeola> 2.48 (>1.09

ref) 1.83> Polio > 1:32, 1:128, 1:128 (Ref 1:8) 1:8,1:128, 1:8> > Twin

#2 2> Years Ago Recent> > CD4 Absolute High

21.20> Not Tested IgG> 518 (Ref 592 - 1723 638> Hep B >

Nonreactive Nonreactive> Rubella >

Immune 2.19 (>1.1> ref) Rubeola> 2.59 (>1.1 ref) 1.45> Polio> 1:128, 1:128, 1:8 (ref 1:8) 1:32, 1:128, 1:8> > The boys tested negative to HHV6, Epstein Barr, and Herpes 1

and 2. > They tested positive to CMV, though. On the ones I can compare, it> looks like titers have improved. What do think about them showing> nonreactive to Hep B? Anyway, do you think it looks like they are still> candidates for viral treatment? My DAN seems to think that naturals> don't work. I tried OLE in the beginning, but I couldn't get them to> take it (bad taste). Incidentally, my NT son's tests look almost> exactly the same. Do you think the homeopathics did enough, or does it> look I still need to address the viruses? Finally, I'd love to hear> more about people who are chelating at the same time as using Valtrex.> > Thanks for sticking it out to the end of this post, and thanks for your> help.> > Ruth>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

It is IGG. I just relooked at the tests, though, and found one twin also has an IGG positive to HHV6. But, he wasn't positive 2 years ago. Would you use Valtrex on a child that isn't on the spectrum? Stan Kurtz <kurtzstan@...> wrote: I'm not sure what type of test that is (IGG or IGM), but if you have high CMV titers (especially IGM) I would consider starting Valtrex, yes. And if you didn't and felt you had a viral kid, I still would do it. My son didn't test posative before, during, or after. Like with MB12, I think a short trial will tell you if it is going to help.- Stan>> > Stan and Others -> > I have 5 year old twins who are

both vaccine damaged (one PDD, one SID).> We have been doing biomedical for a little over 2 years (GFCF and> typical supps). We have been chelating for almost 10 months with great> results (TD-DMPS alone for 5 months, then TD-ALA along with it, for the> last 5 months). In the beginning, both boys did a handful of> homepathic remedies, many of which were geared to help the body clear> viruses from the vaccines (they had relatively high titers). Both boys> got rashes and had regressions for about a month. Then, about 18 months> ago, the doc introduced new ones, supposedly more effective, but with> the same goal. Again, we had about a month-long regression, but this> time no rash. Both times the boys came out of it much improved, but it> was very rocky during the regression. We took those for about a year> and

stopped (switched doctors).> > We have recently retested immune function, titers and viruses. I was> hoping you could take a look at these and see if you think my kids could> benefit from Valtrex. Here are the results:> > Twin #1 2> Years Ago Recent> > CD4

Absolute High 20.20> Not Tested IgG Total> 506 (Ref 592 - 1723) 655> Hep

B > Nonreactive Nonreactive>

Rubella > Immune 2.9 (>1.1> ref) Rubeola> 2.48 (>1.09

ref) 1.83> Polio > 1:32, 1:128, 1:128 (Ref 1:8) 1:8,1:128, 1:8> > Twin

#2 2> Years Ago Recent> > CD4 Absolute High

21.20> Not Tested IgG> 518 (Ref 592 - 1723 638> Hep B >

Nonreactive Nonreactive> Rubella >

Immune 2.19 (>1.1> ref) Rubeola> 2.59 (>1.1 ref) 1.45> Polio> 1:128, 1:128, 1:8 (ref 1:8) 1:32, 1:128, 1:8> > The boys tested negative to HHV6, Epstein Barr, and Herpes 1

and 2. > They tested positive to CMV, though. On the ones I can compare, it> looks like titers have improved. What do think about them showing> nonreactive to Hep B? Anyway, do you think it looks like they are still> candidates for viral treatment? My DAN seems to think that naturals> don't work. I tried OLE in the beginning, but I couldn't get them to> take it (bad taste). Incidentally, my NT son's tests look almost> exactly the same. Do you think the homeopathics did enough, or does it> look I still need to address the viruses? Finally, I'd love to hear> more about people who are chelating at the same time as using Valtrex.> > Thanks for sticking it out to the end of this post, and thanks for your> help.> > Ruth>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Valtrex was origionally made for people not on the spectrum... so yes, I would.

I don't

think GlaxosmithKline has any idea it is helping kids with autism... except that

I called

them with methylation oriented questions and no one is returning my phone

call... go

figure.

- Stan

> >

> >

> > Stan and Others -

> >

> > I have 5 year old twins who are both vaccine damaged (one PDD, one

> SID).

> > We have been doing biomedical for a little over 2 years (GFCF and

> > typical supps). We have been chelating for almost 10 months with

> great

> > results (TD-DMPS alone for 5 months, then TD-ALA along with it,

> for the

> > last 5 months). In the beginning, both boys did a handful of

> > homepathic remedies, many of which were geared to help the body

> clear

> > viruses from the vaccines (they had relatively high titers). Both

> boys

> > got rashes and had regressions for about a month. Then, about 18

> months

> > ago, the doc introduced new ones, supposedly more effective, but

> with

> > the same goal. Again, we had about a month-long regression, but

> this

> > time no rash. Both times the boys came out of it much improved,

> but it

> > was very rocky during the regression. We took those for about a

> year

> > and stopped (switched doctors).

> >

> > We have recently retested immune function, titers and viruses. I

> was

> > hoping you could take a look at these and see if you think my kids

> could

> > benefit from Valtrex. Here are the results:

> >

> > Twin #1

> 2

> > Years Ago Recent

> >

> > CD4 Absolute High

> 20.20

> > Not Tested IgG Total

> > 506 (Ref 592 - 1723) 655

> > Hep

> B

> > Nonreactive Nonreactive

> > Rubella

> > Immune 2.9

> (>1.1

> > ref) Rubeola

> > 2.48 (>1.09 ref) 1.83

> >

> Polio

>

> > 1:32, 1:128, 1:128 (Ref 1:8) 1:8,1:128, 1:8

> >

> > Twin #2

> 2

> > Years Ago Recent

> >

> > CD4 Absolute High

> 21.20

> > Not Tested IgG

> > 518 (Ref 592 - 1723 638

> > Hep

> B

> > Nonreactive Nonreactive

> >

> Rubella

> > Immune 2.19

> (>1.1

> > ref) Rubeola

> > 2.59 (>1.1 ref) 1.45

> > Polio

> > 1:128, 1:128, 1:8 (ref 1:8) 1:32, 1:128, 1:8

> >

> > The boys tested negative to HHV6, Epstein Barr, and Herpes 1 and

> 2.

> > They tested positive to CMV, though. On the ones I can compare, it

> > looks like titers have improved. What do think about them showing

> > nonreactive to Hep B? Anyway, do you think it looks like they are

> still

> > candidates for viral treatment? My DAN seems to think that

> naturals

> > don't work. I tried OLE in the beginning, but I couldn't get them

> to

> > take it (bad taste). Incidentally, my NT son's tests look almost

> > exactly the same. Do you think the homeopathics did enough, or

> does it

> > look I still need to address the viruses? Finally, I'd love to

> hear

> > more about people who are chelating at the same time as using

> Valtrex.

> >

> > Thanks for sticking it out to the end of this post, and thanks for

> your

> > help.

> >

> > Ruth

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Valtrex was origionally made for people not on the spectrum... so yes, I would.

I don't

think GlaxosmithKline has any idea it is helping kids with autism... except that

I called

them with methylation oriented questions and no one is returning my phone

call... go

figure.

- Stan

> >

> >

> > Stan and Others -

> >

> > I have 5 year old twins who are both vaccine damaged (one PDD, one

> SID).

> > We have been doing biomedical for a little over 2 years (GFCF and

> > typical supps). We have been chelating for almost 10 months with

> great

> > results (TD-DMPS alone for 5 months, then TD-ALA along with it,

> for the

> > last 5 months). In the beginning, both boys did a handful of

> > homepathic remedies, many of which were geared to help the body

> clear

> > viruses from the vaccines (they had relatively high titers). Both

> boys

> > got rashes and had regressions for about a month. Then, about 18

> months

> > ago, the doc introduced new ones, supposedly more effective, but

> with

> > the same goal. Again, we had about a month-long regression, but

> this

> > time no rash. Both times the boys came out of it much improved,

> but it

> > was very rocky during the regression. We took those for about a

> year

> > and stopped (switched doctors).

> >

> > We have recently retested immune function, titers and viruses. I

> was

> > hoping you could take a look at these and see if you think my kids

> could

> > benefit from Valtrex. Here are the results:

> >

> > Twin #1

> 2

> > Years Ago Recent

> >

> > CD4 Absolute High

> 20.20

> > Not Tested IgG Total

> > 506 (Ref 592 - 1723) 655

> > Hep

> B

> > Nonreactive Nonreactive

> > Rubella

> > Immune 2.9

> (>1.1

> > ref) Rubeola

> > 2.48 (>1.09 ref) 1.83

> >

> Polio

>

> > 1:32, 1:128, 1:128 (Ref 1:8) 1:8,1:128, 1:8

> >

> > Twin #2

> 2

> > Years Ago Recent

> >

> > CD4 Absolute High

> 21.20

> > Not Tested IgG

> > 518 (Ref 592 - 1723 638

> > Hep

> B

> > Nonreactive Nonreactive

> >

> Rubella

> > Immune 2.19

> (>1.1

> > ref) Rubeola

> > 2.59 (>1.1 ref) 1.45

> > Polio

> > 1:128, 1:128, 1:8 (ref 1:8) 1:32, 1:128, 1:8

> >

> > The boys tested negative to HHV6, Epstein Barr, and Herpes 1 and

> 2.

> > They tested positive to CMV, though. On the ones I can compare, it

> > looks like titers have improved. What do think about them showing

> > nonreactive to Hep B? Anyway, do you think it looks like they are

> still

> > candidates for viral treatment? My DAN seems to think that

> naturals

> > don't work. I tried OLE in the beginning, but I couldn't get them

> to

> > take it (bad taste). Incidentally, my NT son's tests look almost

> > exactly the same. Do you think the homeopathics did enough, or

> does it

> > look I still need to address the viruses? Finally, I'd love to

> hear

> > more about people who are chelating at the same time as using

> Valtrex.

> >

> > Thanks for sticking it out to the end of this post, and thanks for

> your

> > help.

> >

> > Ruth

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...